1 / 68

Heavy Flavour Physics at the Tevatron

Heavy Flavour Physics at the Tevatron. Zero to Z0 Conference: Fermilab, May 12-14 2004. Farrukh Azfar, Oxford University (CDF). Overview of this presentation :. Preliminary: 1) Tevatron performance, Beauty physics at hadron colliders 2) CDF and D0 detectors, relevance for B-physics

finn
Download Presentation

Heavy Flavour Physics at the Tevatron

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heavy Flavour Physics at the Tevatron Zero to Z0 Conference: Fermilab, May 12-14 2004 Farrukh Azfar, Oxford University (CDF)

  2. Overview of this presentation: Preliminary: 1) Tevatron performance, Beauty physics at hadron colliders 2) CDF and D0 detectors, relevance for B-physics Physics Results & Prospects: 3) Tests of Heavy Quark Expansion (HQE) Masses and Lifetimes of B hadrons. Hadronic Moments. 4) Search for Flavour Changing Neutral Current (FCNC), Rare decays… 5) Mixing and CP violation (CPV), Toward Bs-mixing & CKM angle g. 6) Conclusion and Summary

  3. Tevatron pp collider upgrade & performance, integrated luminosity Run-IIa -Goals are Ldt=2fb-1 (x20 Run-I, 1992-96) Run-II Tevatron Upgrades: -Main Injector for Tevatron -Higher proton intensity -Anti-proton transfer efficiency increased -Anti-proton recycler (coming after autumn) CDF Performance Improvement: -Collision rate: 3.5 ms 396 ns - Bunches: 6x6 36x36 -Center of Mass energy: 1.81.96 TeV/c2 -Peak luminosity : 2.4x10317.2 x1031cm2s-1 (Below target by x2.5, but improving) Data taking efficiency~80-90% for CDF & D0 Results in this talk: CDF analyses ~65-250 pb-1 D analyses ~115-250 pb-1 290 pb-1on tape at CDF & D0

  4. s(bb) at (4S) = 1nb (B-factories) (Compare bb production s(bb) at Z0 = 7nb (LEP) cross section) s(bb) at pp (1.96TeV/c2)=150mb(Tevatron Experiments) More B @ Tevatron but inelastic s is 103 x s(bb) -Select b-data online, key: right detector & triggers -Rewards: all B-hadrons e.g.B, B0, Bs, Bc , b … (unlike B-factories) & higher s than at Z0 Clever Online BSelection(Triggers): ”Traditional” Use leptons from e.g. BsDs+m-nCDF & D0 (single-lepton) & B J/yK*, J/ym+m-:CDF & D0 (di-lepton) ”Modern” long B lifetimeslarge impact parameter (IP) of daughter tracks : CDF (D0 in progress) SVT trigger: purely hadronic decays of B and Charm e.g. D0p+p-, BsDs+p-, Ds+f p+fK+K- (1st @ hadron machine!) CDF Apply High IP requirement in single-Lepton data as well Why Beauty at the Hadron-Hadron Colliders ?

  5. CDF Detector The CDF & D0 Detectors in Run-II CDF & D0 Detectors are both Multi-purpose with: -Axial Solenoid -Inner Silicon micovertex detectors -Outer trackers -Calorimetry -Muon ID -Muon Triggering (CDF & D0) -High IP Track triggering (CDF) D0: Better calorimetry, better muon & tracking coverage CDF: Better momentum measurement, also can select high IP tracks, some Hadron ID with dE/dX, TOF D0 Detector

  6. Physics Results, Testing HQE: B-hadron lifetimes, massesGoals, Techniques Goal: test the HQE Predicted B Lifetime hierarchy : tBc << tXb0 ~ tLb < tBd ~ tBs < t B- < t Xb- • Fully Reconstructed B from J/ym+m- di-muon trigger (e.g. BsJ/yf) or High IP trigger (e.g. BsK+K-) • Find vertex, 2-d distance: Lxy invariant mass: MB • momentum in 2-d: PtB Find proper time: ct = Lxy. MB/PtB • - Fit mass distribution only or mass and lifetime distributions • Partially Reconstructed e.g. Bsm+Ds-n, B+m+nD0 • 1-lepton (+High IP track CDF )trigger: • Missing n means: ct = Lxy.MB/PtB=Lxy(D0m+).MBK./Pt(m+D0) • -K= Pt(m+D0) /PtBfrom MC: high statistics but worsesct -Decays selected using SVT trigger have biased ct -”Turn-on” near low IP cut -”Turn-off” at high IP cut -Bias fix underway: Then measure Lifetimes in BsDs+p- etc….

  7. J/ym+m-, fK+K-(using di-muon (J/y) trigger): Run-I: ~60 at CDF. Run-II: D0~403, CDF~269 Largest sample of fully reconstructed Bs remains at the Tevatron Physics Results, HQE: BsJ/y f, Lifetime and Mass: CDF:M(Bs)=5366.010.73(stat)0.0.33 (sys)MeV/c2D0:M(Bs)=53605 MeV/c2 CDF: t(Bs)=1.3470.0990.013 ps & t(Bs)/t(Bd)= 0.89 0.072 D0: t(Bs) = 1.1900.180.014 ps (69 events, update in progress) Mass & Lifetime Results from assorted other fully reconstructed decays: CDF: t(LB)= 1.25±0.26±0.10 ps (bJ/y), M(LB)=5619.7±1.2±1.2 MeV/c2 Bs and LB mass measurements remain worlds best..

  8. Physics Results (aside): Bs width difference DGs angular separation of CP eigenstates CDF & D0 fit 1 lifetime But: there are 2: tCP+,tCP- & DGBs=1/tCP+-1/tCP- DGs: predicted to be large ~10%, provides SM consistency check: DGs=A.DMBs If DMBs is large & DGs is small or vice-versasign of new physics Need to measure lifetime(s) : can do, and determine CP content: Use angular analysis…(CDF) and put them together (when we have higher statistics) Convenient basis: transversity Allows easy separation of CP content of BVV decays Analyse: Bs J/y f &Bd J/yK* as a check (J/ym+m-, fK+K-,K*(892)K+p-) PDF has 3 angles: f(QT ,FT, QK*) with amplitude parameters A,A A0 so that: A2=CP odd fraction & A2+A02=CP even fraction

  9. Physics Results (aside): Bs width difference DGs angular separation of CP eigenstates Using 176 BsJ/yf & 993 BdJ/yK*(892) (as a check) Compatible with BaBar & Belle Polarization analysis indicates CP+ = 0.77±0.10: The larger the dominance of a CP eigenstate the greater the accuracy of DGs Analysis will be done at D0 as well !

  10. Physics Results Testing HQE: Charged to Neutral B-Meson lifetime ratio (D0) D0: Charged to Neutral B-Meson Lifetime Ratio: t+/t0 Use: -B m+nD*(2010)-X: mostly Bd -B m+nD0X : mostly Bu± -Calculate ratio of events/lifetime bin N+/N0 ~e-(t+/t0-1)t (K-factor)st -Calculate expected ratio using all BRs in terms of k= t+/t0, and N(overall normalization) & Minimize c2 determine k and N D0 Result:t+/t0 = 1.093 ± 0.021 ± 0.022, N=1.001±0.012 BaBar: t(B+)/t(Bd)= 1.064 ±0.031 ±0.026 CDF: t(B+)/t(Bd)= 1.080 0.042Belle: t(B+)/t(Bd)= 1.091±0.023±0.014(B+J/yK+ & BdJ/yK*0) One of the World’s best single measurements

  11. bJ/y (CDF) Physics Results Testing HQE: More B decays used: BdJ/y K* (D0) B+J/y K+(D0) B+J/y K+(CDF)

  12. Physics Results: Hadronic Moments from D** decays 1) HQE:G(BXclnl)~GF2|Vcb|2 mb5.S(Cn/mb)n with Cn = <0|OnHQE|0> (non-perturbative, can extract from data) 2) Free parameters : L at O(1/mb), l1+l2 @ O(1/mb2) , etc…. 3) Moments M1,M2 of Xc invariant mass distribution: from B-decays: have expansions similar to 1) i.e..in terms of L & l1+l2 (sH=MXc2) 4) By finding pdf & hence M1, M2 ->constrain L, l1 , & improve Vcb measurements 5) Now First 2 pieces from D*, D0 are well known. f** (sH) comes from narrow & wide D**+higher order(resonant & non-resonant): |Vcb|incl= (41.9 ± 0.7exp ± 0.6theo) 10-3 containsL, l1

  13. Reconstruct B- D**0 l- Find m and D**0 consistent with B parent (vertex). Use lepton + high IP track data. Physics Results : Hadronic Moments f**(sH) distribution Reconstruct D**0D*+- & D**0D+- decays are reconstructed, moments: m1, m2 calculated wrt f**(sH) In going from m to M assume: -lepton p in B rest frame >700 MeV -MD, MD* , Branching ratios from PDG -Only D** decays to 1p + D, D* M1 M2 from D, D* & D** best single measurement !

  14. -Use high-mass di-muon data • -BRSM(Bsm+m- )=(3.8 ± 1.0) 10-9some extensions predict x103 BRSM • Variables: Mass, lifetime, Df from vertex & Isolation • 1 background event expected, 1 event seen: no excess->BR limit Rare B decays: B s(d)m+m- at CDF BR Upper Limit at 95% CL 7.5x10-7 Bsm+m- (World’s best) 1.9x10-7 Bdm+m- BR Upper Limit at 90% CL 5.8x10-7 (Bsm+m-) 1.5x10-7 (Bdm+m-) “Blind” analysis: cuts optimization before looking at the signal mass region Bd result: Belle: 1.6x10-7 & BaBar 2.0x10-7 Submitted to PRL

  15. Physics Results Bsm+m- limits from D0: -Use MC for signal data, background for cut optimisation: -Expect 7.3  1.8 background events in signal region The analysis has not been unblinded yet (signal region still hidden). It is still being optimized (without bias) and expected to improve … 180 pb-1 Expected limit (Feldman/Cousins): Br(Bs  + -) < 9.1  10-7 @ 95 % CL (stat only) Br(Bs  + -) < 1.0  10-6 @ 95 % CL (stat + syst) (expected signal has been normalised to B  J/ K for BR limit calculation)

  16. Rare Decays: Bsff :Observation & BR (SVT Trigger) CDF 1) Bsff decays via second order weak decay 2) SUSY coupling could enhance the SM BR (10-5) 3) Comparison of angular distributions of various B VV decays can determine a and g First “observation” (4.8s) ! Blind analysis 1) Normalization Mode: BsJ/y f 2) Relative Efficiencies from MC 3) N(Bs J/y f) is corrected for: Reflections from Bd J/y K* 4) J/y  m+m-fK+K-BsJ/y f BRs taken from PDG BR= (1.4 ± 0.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.5 (BR))x10-5 (SM 3.7x10-5) Upper Limit : <2.7x10-5 @ 95% CL

  17. -Mixing: tag B-flavour at birth, decay to flavour specific state: asymmetry: Amix~Cos(Dmd,st) -CPV: tag B at birth, decay to CP eigenstate: asymmetry(t) Acpv~Acpv,direct.Cos(Dmd,st)+Acpv,mixing.Sin(Dmd,st) Mixing and CP violation (CPV) in Bd,s decays, basics: Issues: Tagging Flavour Correctly… ....& being able to tag at all Statistical power: N tagged events = eD2N pure events Opposite side tagging Same side tagging Concept:Look for B on opposite side of B of interest -Look for m,e -Use weighted jet-charge Disadvantages: Opposite B not in acceptance (60%) or mixes (B0) Concept: Look for p± (K±) from hadronization of B (Bs) of interest, Higher e Check algorithms in known b-flavour decays eg B± J/yK± Prepare for Bs mixing by first doing Bd mixing

  18. 250 pb-1 -Data sample: lepton triggers -Bdm+D*(2010)-X (D*-D0p-,D0 K+p-) -Find m+, D0,p- consistent with B -Select events within |DM(D*-,D0)PDG- DM(D*-,D0)|<0.04GeV/c2 -Opposite-side m tags flavour -Use PDG BRs to calculate expected & observed asymmetry(t) -DMd & Purity are free parameters & fit Proof of principle: Bd mixing at D0 Preliminary results: md = 0.506  0.055 0.049 ps-1 Consistent with world average: 0.502  0.007 ps-1 Tagging efficiency: 4.8  0.2 % Tagging Purity: 73.0  2.1 % First D0 mixing Measurement !!

  19. CDF Run-I Dmd (all methods) = 0.495 ± 0.026 ± 0.025 ps-1 Proof of principle CDF (Run-II) DMd measurement First Run-II mixing result: same side tagging (SST) Find fragmentation p from B, track near B with lowest relative PT B+J/y K+, D0p+ to check tag, B0J/y K*0, Dp for Dmd -1.1KB0J/yK*0 (J/y data) -4.9K B0Dp (SVT Trigger!) DMd=0.55±0.10 ps-1 Dilution (D) =12.4 % eD2=1.0±0.5 Work on jet-charge & opposite side muon Tagging continues

  20. Physics Prospects: Toward Bs mixing at CDF : fully reconstructed decays : B0s Ds Decays we plan to use: B0s Ds, B0s Ds Proper time resolution: t = 67 fs  t  PT/PT First observation of mode BsDs+p-with(Ds+fp+, f K+K-) !“Flagship” Mode for Bs mixing ! -Need to tag initial B flavour -projection awaits final eD2 -Currently have reconstructed onlyDsfp -Reconstruct with more Ds decays eg:K*0K, + to improve yields…

  21. Use leptons (CDF: lepton+high IP track) & select Bsm+Ds-X Physics Prospects: Toward Bs mixing semi-leptonic decays: Find lepton+Ds-fp-f K+K- lepton has charge opp. to Ds Plots have different mass resolution and S/B • Also Lifetime measurement provides valuable constraint on DGBs: • t=(tcp+2+tcp-2 )/(tcp++tcp-) as in B0s Ds

  22. MC - u W d u,c,t b b d u W - u W s u,c,t b s b u W Lumi~180pb-1 Physics Prospects: CP violation in Bh+h- (SVT data) decays determining angleg (CDF), Method: Bh+h- from hadronic trigger Data ! (891 events) Tree > penguin in Bp+p- vice-versa in BsK+K- Four unknowns In Asymmetry(t): d=ratio of penguin/tree hadronic matrix elements q= phase of d g,b= weak phases Constrain b from B-factories, measure g by fitting asymmetry (t) Proposed by: R.Fleischer, PLB459 1999 306 dE/dx check: Use D*±D0p, D0 Kp 1st Stage Statistically SeparateBd p+p-, Bd K+p-, Bs K+p-, BsK+K- - Use: M vs a=(1-p1/p2)q1:6 distinct shapes for p+p- K+K-, (Bd,Bs) K+p-,p+K- -Use: dE/dX distinguishes Kp to 1.16s in the future use DmBdDmBs too…

  23. hep-ph/0404009 SM check by comparison with ACP in Bd BR(Bd+-) BR(BsK+K-) U-Spin relationship 58°<<72° dir ACP(Bd+-) Physics Prospects: CP violation in Bh+h- decays determining angleg (CDF) Yields (Results from 65 pb-1) Bdp+p- 14817 BdKp 3914 BsKp 311 BsK+K- 9017 (BsK+K- First Observation !) Results use 65 pb-1 sample, 1.16s dE/dX Kp separation: Update with dE/dX (1.4s) & 180 pb-1 underway ! Sanity check (spot on !): Measure Ratio of Branching Ratios CDF :G(Bdp+p-)/G(Bd K+p-) = 0.26 ±0.11±0.055, PDG: Ratios of BRs (CDF) & ACP(Bdp+p-) (B-factories): Check SM consistency (D.London) Finally we expect: (Fleischer method) (2fb-1):() =±10(stat) ±3(syst SU(3) breaking)

  24. CDF & D0 are completing 1st phase (~250pb-1) of data taking : • a) Current s(t(Bu+)/t(Bd0) ) surpasses theoretical accuracy. Also tests of vertexing & tracking (for future DMBs and CPV) • b) Search for FCNC set limits on rare BRs • c) Prepare for Bs mixing: Establish by measuring Bd mixing first ! • 2) Next phase (>250pb-1 &<500pb-1) will: • a) set limits on (or observe) Bs mixing • b) set limits on DGBs • c) search for CPV in the neutral B system • d) Continue to improve limits of Rare Decay BRs • 3) Final Phase (end Run-IIa) (>500pb-1 and <2fb-1) all of the previous &: • a) Achieve better than 1% accuracy on s(t(Bs)/t(Bd) ) & s(t(Bd)/t(Lb)) • b) Measure Bs mixing parameter xs expect to measure d(DGs)~5% • c) Measure CKM angle g • d) ……and search for unexpectedly large CPV in BsJ/yf • Last phase will be mostly complementary to the B-factories Conclusions:

  25. Backup Slides

  26. Aside: Physics Results: Ratio of branching ratiosof BsDsp toBdDp Interest in BsDsp is mostly due to Bs mixing but:we’ve also measured the ratio of branching ratios G(BsDsp)/G(BdDp) Normalization mode is BdDp, D Kp+p- Kinematically ~BsDsp, Ds fp, fK+K- Ratio of Bs to Bd signals is: Where e are determined from Monte-Carlo D, Ds BR are from PDG, obtain: Using fs/fd =0.273±0.034 from PDG obtain: …we’re beginning to fill in PDG section on the Bs

  27. 0.5M Charm decays at CDF 10-20% come from B: Great Potential for B and Charm Physics, opens at least as many avenues as J/y trigger Data Samples: B and Charm from the hadronic trigger Some charm is prompt D from direct charm: Points back to beam spot ..Some charm is from B D from B has a impact Parameter wrt beam spot An example of B reconstructed Using data from this trigger: ..to separate prompt Ds from Ds coming from B Prompt Charm D0K86.5  0.4 % (stat) D*D087.6  1.1 % (stat) DK89.1  0.4 % (stat) Ds72.4  3.4 % (stat) We have B and tons of Charm as well !

  28. Signal lifetime is modelled by : Complete likelihood function: Complete event probability density Background shape from side-bands Physics Results:Average B-hadron lifetime from partially reconstructed BJ/yX decays This is a “sanity check” of our BJ/y sample: Obtain Average B hadron tB From all BJ/y (+other stuff) decays: B is not fully reconstructed D0 Inclusive B Lifetime Partially reconstructed B -Correct for missed daughters: F(PT) (from by Monte-Carlo) -tB is an estimate -it is the average lifetime of all hadrons decaying to J/y Results from D0 and CDF tB=1.5610.0240.074 ps D0 (40 pb-1) tB=1.5260.0340.035 ps CDF (18 pb-1) Both consistent with: PDG: tB= 1.564  0.014

  29. Bs width difference DGs and angular variable separation Two CP states: transversity • One lifetime(width) has been fit in this mode • But contains two distinct lifetimes: CP+ & CP- Bs, significant lifetime (width) difference: • DGs=1/tB1-1/tB2 • 2) Extract DGs : fit two lifetimes, use single angle to separate CP+ and CP- Bs: (Transversity angle q) • SM prediction forDGs ~0.10Gs alsoDGs= A.xs (xs = Bs mixing parameter)ifDGsis smalland xs is large or vice-versaSign of new physics • CDF prediction for 2fb-1 d(DGs)~0.05 Two CP states: lifetime Total function and normalization Current limit (LEP):s / s <0.31, from branching ratio of BsDs±(*)Ds(*) Note: SM CP violation in this mode: O(3%), if large new physics CP asymmetry = sin2e  DGs, measured= DGs,SM.Cos2e (complementary)

  30. Physics Results: lifetime, mass, from fully reconstructed B J/y X modes: Standard Technique : Probability Density Function (pdf) Data from J/ym+m- di-muon trigger: 1) Reconstruct vertex according to decay topology 2) Calculate decay proper time mass & errors 3) If fitting for mass:fit mass only 4) If fitting for lifetime:Fit mass and lifetime using bi-variate Probability density function (PDF) in likelihood 1) Signal Lifetime : 2) Signal Mass : An Example B+ ->J/y K+ at CDF 3) Signal for Mass only analyses: 4) Signal pdf in mass and lifetime: 5) Signal for lifetime analysis: Both the mass and lifetime distributions are fit in a single step. Technique is applied to : B+gJ/y K+, B0gJ/y K0* (K0* g Kp), Bsg J/yf (fgKK), LbgJ/yL (Lgpp) 6) Normalization : mass & lifetime

  31. B physics prospects(with 2fb-1) Both competitive and complementary to B -factories • Bs mixing: Bs →Dsπ(Ds3π)(xsup to 60, with xd meas. one side of U.T.) • Angle : B0→ J/ψ Ks(refine Run1 meas. up to (sen2)  0.05) • CP violation, angleγ: B0→ ππ(πK), Bs→ KK(Kπ) • Angle s and s/ s : Bs→ J/ψ(probe for New Physics) • Precise Lifetimes, Masses, BRfor all B-hadrons: Bs, Bc, Λb … (CDF observed: Bc → J/ψ e(). Now hadronic channels Bc → Bs X can be explored) • HF cross sections (beauty and charm) • Stringent tests of SM … or evidence for new physics !!

  32. Signal lifetime is modelled by : Complete likelihood function: Complete event probability density Background shape from side-bands Physics Results:Average B-hadron lifetime from partially reconstructed BJ/yX decays. This is a “sanity check” of our BJ/y sample: Obtain Average B hadron tB From all BJ/y (+other stuff) decays: B is not fully reconstructed If Fully reconstructed B -ct= c.(time in B rest frame) -Lxy = 2-d decay length -MB = mass -PT = transverse momentum D0 Inclusive B Lifetime If Partially reconstructed B -Correct for missed daughters: F(PT) (from by Monte-Carlo) -tB is an estimate -it is the average lifetime of all hadrons decaying to J/y Results from D0 and CDF tB=1.5610.0240.074 ps D0 (40 pb-1) tB=1.5260.0340.035 ps CDF (18 pb-1) Both consistent with: PDG: tB= 1.564  0.014

  33. 1 B 1   » ) + ( sin (2 ) e D N S 2 ms/md a Sin(2) in B0J/y Ks g b N(B0)(t) - N(B0)(t) ACP(t) = =Dsin(2b)sin(Dmd t) N(B0)(t) + N(B0)(t) In Run1 measured: B0  J/ Ks ; J/   sin(2b)=0.79±0.39±0.16 (400 events) sin(2b)=0.91±0.32±0.18 (+60 B0   (2S) Ks) With 2fb-1 can refine this measurement Although: no way to compete with B-Factories ! N(J/ Ks) from scaling Run I data: • x 20 luminosity 8,000 • x 1.25 tracks at L1 trigger 10,000 • x 2 muon acceptance 20,000 • Trigger on J/  e+e+ 10,000 Stat. Error: Expect: s(sin2b)  0.05 Systematic ~ 0.5xStatistical (scales with control sample statistics) Combined eD2: from 6.3% to 9.1%(Kaon b-tag) Same S/B = 1

  34. Tevatron Performance 3.8 x 1031 • Tevatron operations • Startup slow, but progress steady ! • Now:L ~3.5 x 1031 cm-2s-1 • integrating ~ 6. pb-1/week • … still factor 2-3 below planned values • additional improvements (~10-20%) expected from Jan. 3weeks shutdown Initial Luminosity July ‘01 Now • CDF operations • Commissioning: Summer 2001 • Physics data since February 2002 • Running with >90% Silicon integrated • since July 2002 On-tape Luminosity 110 pb -1 • Luminosity (on-tape): • ~20pb-1until June (analyses in this talk) • Additional 90pb-1 July – December • Reach 300- 400 pb-1 by October 2003 July ‘02 Feb ‘02

  35. Quadrant of CDF II Tracker TOF:100ps resolution, 2 sigma K/ separation for tracks below 1.6 GeV/c (significant improvement of Bs flavor tag effectiveness) TIME OF FLIGHT COT: large radius (1.4 m) Drift C. • 96 layers, 100ns drift time • Precise PT above 400 MeV/c • Precise 3D tracking in ||<1 (1/PT) ~ 0.1%GeV –1; (hit)~150m • dE/dx info provides 1 sigma K/ separation above 2 GeV • SVX-II + ISL: 6 (7) layers of double-side silicon (3cm < R < 30cm) • Standalone 3D tracking up to ||= 2 • Very good I.P. resolution: ~30m (~20 m with Layer00) LAYER 00: 1 layer of radiation-hard silicon at very small radius (1.5 cm) (achievable: 45 fs proper time resolution inBs Dsp )

  36. CDF II Trigger System 3 levels: 5 MHz (pp rate) 50 Hz (disk/tape storage rate) almost no dead time (< 10%) • XFT: “EXtremely Fast Tracker” • 2D COT track reconstruction at Level 1 • PT res. DpT/p2T = 2% (GeV-1) • azimuthal angle res. Df = 8 mrad • SVT: “Silicon Vertex Tracker” • precise 2D Silicon+XFT tracking at Level 2 • impact parameter res. d = 35 m • Offline accuracy !! CAL MUON CES COT SVX XFT XCES Matched to L1 ele. and muons XTRP enhanced J/ samples L1 CAL L1 TRACK L1 MUON GLOBAL L1 SVT L2 CAL CDF II can trigger on secondary vertices !! Select large B,D samples !! GLOBAL LEVEL 2 TSI/CLK

  37. COT track ( 2 parameters) 5 SVX coordinates beam spot d Impact Parameter (transverse projection) SVT: Triggering on impact parameters ~150 VME boards • Combines COT tracks (from XFT) with Silicon Hits (via pattern • matching) • Fits track parameters in the transverse plane (d, , PT)with offline res. • All this in ~15ms ! • Allows triggering on displaced impact parameters/vertices • CDF becomes a beauty/charm factory

  38. B triggers: conventional Needspecialized triggers (bb) /(pp)  10-3 CDF Run1, lepton-based triggers: • Di-leptons (, PT 2 GeV/c): B  J/ X, J/   • Single high PT lepton ( 8 GeV/c): B  l  D X Suffer of low BR and not fully rec. final state Nevertheless, many important measurements by CDF 1: B0d mixing, sin(2), B lifetimes, Bc observation, … • Now enhanced, thanks to XFT (precise tracking at L1) : • Reduced (21.5 GeV/c) and more effective PT thresholds • Increased muon and electron coverage • Also J/  ee

  39. XFT performance Efficiency curve: XFT threshold at PT=1.5 GeV/c  = 96.1 ± 0.1 % (L1 trigger) XFT: L1 trigger on tracks better than design resolution pT/p2T = 1.65% (GeV-1)  = 5.1 mrad Offline track XFT track 11 pb-1 53.000 J/  

  40. SVT performance • I.P. resolution as planned • d = 48 m = 35m  33 m intrinsic D0  Kp used as online monitor of the hadronic SVT triggers transverse beam size • Efficiency S/B  1 90% soon 80%

  41. TOF performance • TOF resolution (110ps) within 10% of design value Background reduction in KK: Low PT (< 1.5 GeV/c) track pairs before and after a cut on TOF kaon probability x20 bkg reduction, 80% signal efficiency with TOF PID S/N = 1/2.5 S/N = 1/40

  42. CDF J/y cross section 0<pt<0.25 GeV 5.0<pt<5.5 GeV 10.0<pt<12.0 GeV s(ppgJ/y; pT>0; |h|<0.6) =240  1 (stat) 35/28(syst) nb

  43. D0 K D0 KK D0  5670180 2020110 56320490 K mass KK mass  mass Lots of charm from hadronic triggers: With ~10 pb-1 of “hadronic trigger” data: Relative Br. Fractions of Cabibbo suppressed D0 decays : Already competitive with CLEO2 results (10fb-1 @ (4S)) !!!!! (DKK)/(DK) = 11.17  0.48(stat)  0.98 (syst) % (D )/(DK) = 3.37  0.20(stat)  0.16(syst) % O(107) fully reconstructed decays in 2fb-1 •  Foresee a quite interesting charm physics program: • D cross sections, • CP asymmetries and Mixing in D sector, Rare decays, …

  44. B0s mixing: expectations with 2fb-1 xs = ms(B0s) Bs Ds, Ds  Ds  , K*K,  • Signal: 20K (fp only) - 75K (all) events • with SVT hadronic trigger • BR (Ds ) = 0.3 % ; BR (Ds   ) = 0.8 % • Resolution: • (c)= 45 fs (with Layer00) • eD2 = 11.3% (with TOF) • S/B: 0.5-2 (based on CDF I data) S.M. allowed range: 20. < Xs < 35. 5s sensitivity up to: Xs = 63 (S/B = 2/1) Xs = 53 (S/B = 1/2) Can do a precise measurement … or evidence for new physics !

  45. 75K at D0, completely new capability ! (40 pb-1) 0.5M at CDF (70 pb-1) Data Samples: The J/ym+m- t CDF and D0 (Run-II) Two Fully Reconstructed B-hadronJ/y states at CDF &D0 BJ/y KS:CDF:220, D0:45 (Run-II) (D0 had none in Run-I) LBJ/yL :CDF:53, D0:16 (Run-II)

  46. Data Samples: B and Charm Using the high Impact Parameter (IP) (Hadronic) trigger Select events by requiring : -2 tracks with IP>100 mm - track PT > 2GeV/c - sum 2-track PT > 5.5 GeV/c 0.5M Charm decays at CDF 10-20% come from B: Great Potential for B and Charm Physics, opens at least as many avenues as J/y trigger

  47. Select events with 1 lepton (PT>3 GeV/c) & 1 high IP (>120mm)track: -High IP track means we can go lower in lepton PT ->Much higher than Run-I due to lower PT thresholds (x4-5 increase) Used for: 1) High statistics lifetime and mixing analyses 2) calibration samples for tagging (B+l+nD) Drawback: worse vertex resolution due to missed neutrino Some numbers: BglD0X (D0gKp):~10000 events, BglD+X (D+gKpp):~5,000 events also Bs decays (later) Data Samples: B(+)l+uD decays using “hybrid” trigger

  48. Physics Results: Lifetimes from partially reconstructed decay Decays included:Accounting for missed neutrino Bs  Dsl, Ds*l (Ds, K*0K, +) expect ~40K events in 2 fb-1 st is worse due to missed u (K factor) : t = 60 fs  t  K/K, K/K ~ 14% If one Bs lifetime is fit in any flavour specific mode: tfit = (tBsCP+2+tBsCP-2)/(tBsCP++tBsCP-) from which DGs can be determined as well Use new “hybrid” displaced track+single lepton trigger

  49. Physics Results:LB, lepton+displaced track and purely hadronic data samples (have shown J/y mode already) Protons are easiest to separate using Time of Flight Particle ID in left plot using TOF and dE/dX b cl  [pK] l Lifetime in hadronic, hadron+lepton modes require correction for IP cut bias & missing  Expect results after this summer b cp [pK] p Note on LB A search for CP violation in Baryon decays is planned using LBpp

  50. Mixing and CPviolation (CPV) at Hadron colliders Proof of principle: Run-I, CDF were able to do2smeasurementof sin2b & competitive xd (Dmd/G) measurements: can tag b-flavours in hadron collider environment Sin2b=0.79±0.39(stat)±0.16(sys) (CDF 1996) CDF have not repeated this measurement yet…cannot compare to B-factories… CDF: In Run-II with 40-50 x more BdJ/yKS decays can get d(sin2b)~0.05: D0: Similar statistics Can’t be competitive with BaBar (insert current) and BELLE (insert current) Redo the measurement because: -It’s an important benchmark -Gives credence to other CPV measurements eg. in Bh+h- & BsJ/yf

More Related