1 / 23

Forest Street School

Forest Street School. Quarterly Data Review. Student Population Breakdown. English Language Learners (ELL). This represents 26% of total student population with two service providers. Special Education. This represents 9% of total student population with two service providers. 10. 83. 247.

fineen
Download Presentation

Forest Street School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forest Street School Quarterly Data Review

  2. Student Population Breakdown

  3. English Language Learners (ELL) This represents 26% of total student population with two service providers.

  4. Special Education This represents 9% of total student population with two service providers.

  5. 10 83 247

  6. Day to Day Breakdown

  7. Suspension Summary

  8. Suspension Summary (cont.)

  9. Parent Survey (September 2013) 109 families responded to survey.

  10. Intervention & Referral Services

  11. Benchmark Trends: Language Arts

  12. Benchmark Trends: Math

  13. NJASK Data: Language Arts(Year-to-Year Comparisons) % of Proficiency Grade Levels

  14. NJASK 2012-2013 WritingGrades: 3, 4, 5 (Clusters)

  15. NJASK 2012-2013 WritingGrades: 6, 7 (Clusters)

  16. NJASK 2012 – 2013 Reading Grades: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (Clusters)

  17. NJASK Data: Math(Year-to-Year Comparisons) % of Proficiency Grade Levels

  18. NJASK 2012 – 2013 MathGrades: 3, 4, 5 (Clusters)

  19. NJASK 2012 – 2013 MathGrades: 6, 7 (Clusters)

  20. SMART Goal #1 By June 2014, 100% of instructional staff will have effectively implemented best practices and met Student Growth Objectives (SGO) resulting in a minimum of a 10% increase, in student achievement, on model curriculum benchmarks, pre/post Study Island assessments, SRI, SMI, and NJASK assessment.

  21. SMART Goal #2 • By June 2014, through analyzing and utilizing data, Instructional Staff will have effectively targeted small groups, tailored instruction, and strategically planned to address the needs of Special Education and English Language Learners - resulting in a minimum of a 10% increase in total student growth.

More Related