1 / 14

The Effects of a Complete Balanced Literacy Program on Literacy Achievement

The Effects of a Complete Balanced Literacy Program on Literacy Achievement. Andrea Krasne Crystal Gomez EDU 7201T Applied Theory and Research I Dr. O’Connor-Petruso Fall 2010 - Midterm Presentation 10/19/2010. Table of Contents.

filia
Download Presentation

The Effects of a Complete Balanced Literacy Program on Literacy Achievement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Effects of a Complete Balanced Literacy Program on Literacy Achievement Andrea Krasne Crystal Gomez EDU 7201T Applied Theory and Research I Dr. O’Connor-Petruso Fall 2010 - Midterm Presentation 10/19/2010

  2. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………….......................slide 3 Problem Presentation……………………………..............slide 4 Literature Review………………………..………….....slides 5 -10 Research Hypothesis…………………………………….....slide 11 References……………………………………………………slides 12-15 Closing Comments & Questions……….…………slide 16

  3. Introduction • Growing focus on public education and declining literacy rates • We are failing our students because of lack of preparation and intervention • Decline in teacher training and preparation results • Loose definition of “balanced literacy”

  4. Problem Presentation • Balanced Literacy instruction loosely defined and designed • Teachers not provided with plan of attack • Educators not trained • Early elementary grades receive explicit phonics, then falls off • Struggling readers in grades 3-5 would benefit from implicit and explicit phonics instruction

  5. Literature Review: Phonics

  6. Phonics Pro Con

  7. Literature Review: Whole Language Classrooms

  8. Whole Language Classrooms Pro Con

  9. Literature Review: Balanced Literacy

  10. Balanced Literacy Pro Con

  11. Research Hypothesis

  12. Bruneau, B.J. (1997). Early childhood: The literacy pyramid organization of reading/writing activities in a whole language classroom. The Reading Teacher, 51(2), 158-160. Campbell, P., Rakes, S., & Schaffer, G.L. (Fall, 2000). Investigating the status and perceived importance of explicit phonics instruction in elementary classroom teachers. The Reading Teacher, 51(8), 636-650. Freppon, P.A., & Dahl, K.L. (1998). Balanced instruction: Insights and considerations. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(2), 240-251. Lapp, D., & Flood, J. (May, 1997). Point-counterpoint: Where’s the phonics? Making the case (again) for integrated code instruction. The Reading Teacher, 50(8), 696-700. References

  13. McKenna, M.C., Robinson, R.D., & Miller, J.D. (1990). Whole language: A research agenda for the nineties. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 3-6. Stahl, S.A. (April, 1992). Saying the “p” word: Nine guidelines for exemplary phonics instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45(8), 618-625. Turner, R.L. (December, 1989). The ‘great’ debate--Can Carbo and Chll be right? The Phi Delta Kappan, 71(4), 276-283. References (Continued)

  14. QUESTIONS?

More Related