Usda genetic evaluation program for dairy goats l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 46

USDA Genetic Evaluation Program for Dairy Goats PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 199 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

USDA Genetic Evaluation Program for Dairy Goats . Why Genetic Evaluations?. A valuable tool for genetic selection Allows for comparison of animals in different environments Can include all of the information available for each animal Greatest impact on progress is from selection for males.

Download Presentation

USDA Genetic Evaluation Program for Dairy Goats

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Usda genetic evaluation program for dairy goats l.jpg

USDA Genetic Evaluation Program for Dairy Goats


Why genetic evaluations l.jpg

Why Genetic Evaluations?

  • A valuable tool for genetic selection

  • Allows for comparison of animals in different environments

  • Can include all of the information available for each animal

  • Greatest impact on progress is from selection for males


Why genetic selection l.jpg

Why Genetic Selection?

  • Genetic selection can improve fitness, utility, and profitability

  • Females must be bred to provide replacements and initiate milk production

  • Mate selection is an opportunity to make genetic change


Selection is a continuous process l.jpg

Selection is a Continuous Process

  • Decisions

    • Which females to breed

    • Which males to use

    • Which specific matings to make

    • Which progeny to raise

    • Which females to keep and breed

  • Goals

    • Improve production and efficiency

    • Avoiding inbreeding

    • Correct faults


Genetic improvement program l.jpg

Genetic Improvement Program

Phenotype = Genotype + Environment

  • Genetic improvement programs only change genotype

  • Rate of genetic improvement determined by:

    • Generation interval

    • Selection intensity

    • Heritability

  • Heritability is the portion of total variation due to genetics


Steps in genetic evaluation l.jpg

Steps in Genetic Evaluation

  • Define a breeding goal

  • Measure traits related to the goal

  • Record pedigree to allow detection of relationships across generations

  • Identify non-genetic factors that affect records and could bias evaluations

    • Make adjustments

    • Include in the model

  • Define an evaluation model


Examples of breeding goals l.jpg

Examples of Breeding Goals

  • Increased milk, fat, or protein yield

  • Increased longevity

  • Optimal number of kids born

  • Improved conformation score (overall and linear)

  • Increased profitability


Examples of non genetic factors l.jpg

Examples of Non-genetic Factors

  • Age

  • Lactation

  • Season

  • Litter size

  • Milking frequency

  • Herd


Data flow l.jpg

Data Flow

Milk Data collected monthly

COMPONENT TEST LAB

FARM

DHIA

DRPC

ADGA

INTERNET

AIPL


Does on test at last test in 2005 by processing center l.jpg

Does on Test at Last Test in 2005By Processing Center

Source: DHI Report K-6, 2006 Table 6 Available: http://aipl.arsusda.gov/publish/dhi/current/drpcx.html


Data validation l.jpg

Data Validation

  • Incoming data is checked against database for verification

    • Birth date is checked against kidding date

    • Sire and dam are checked against breeding records and ADGA

  • Cross-references are assigned when identification changes


Data validation cont l.jpg

Data Validation (Cont.)

  • Cross-references are determined based on control number

  • Abnormal yields are detected and reported to DRPC

  • Test dates and testing characteristics are compared with herd data


Alpine milk production lactation curve l.jpg

Lactation 1

Lactation 2

Lactation 3

Alpine Milk ProductionLactation Curve


Alpine fat percentage lactation curve l.jpg

Lactation 1

Lactation 2

Lactation 3

Alpine Fat PercentageLactation Curve


Alpine protein percentage lactation curve l.jpg

Lactation 1

Lactation 2

Lactation 3

Alpine Protein PercentageLactation Curve


Alpine and nubian milk production second lactation l.jpg

Alpine and Nubian Milk Production Second Lactation

Alpine

Nubian


Nubian fat and protein percentage second lactation l.jpg

Nubian Fat and Protein PercentageSecond Lactation

Fat

Protein


Evaluation calculation l.jpg

Evaluation Calculation

  • Goal

    • Predict productivity of progeny

  • Method

    • Separate genetic component from other factors influencing evaluated traits

  • All relationships are considered

    • Bucks receive evaluations from the records on their female relatives


Evaluation model l.jpg

Evaluation model

  • An equation that indicates what factors contribute to an observation

  • Separates the genetic component from other factors

  • Solutions used to predict the genetic potential of progeny


Yield model y hys hs pe a e l.jpg

Yield Model: y = hys + hs + pe + a + e

y = yield of milk, fat, or protein during a lactation

hys = herd-year-season

Environmental effects common to lactations in the same season, within a herd

hs = herd-sire

Effects common to daughters of the same sire, within a herd

pe = permanent environment

Non-genetic effect common to all of a doe’s lactations

a = animal genetic effect (breeding value)

e = unexplained residual


Indexes l.jpg

Indexes

  • An index combines evaluations for a group of traits based on their contribution to a selection goal

  • Milk-Fat-Protein Dollars

    • Combines yield evaluations into a single number

      MFP$ = 0.01(PTAMilk) + 1.15(PTAFat) + 2.55(PTAProtein)


Type traits l.jpg

Type Traits

  • Describe physical characteristics of animal

  • Final Score (overall assessment)

    • Scored  50-99

  • Linear traits (13 defined traits)

    • Scored 1-50


Type evaluation model l.jpg

Type Evaluation Model

MODEL:y = h + a + p + e

y = Adjusted type record

h = Herd appraisal date

a = Animal genetic effect (breeding value)

p = Permanent environment

- Effect common to all a doe's lactations that is not genetic

e = Unexplained residual

Multi-trait - Scores of one trait affect evaluations of other traits.


Type trait genetic correlations l.jpg

Type Trait Genetic Correlations


Combining type and production l.jpg

Combining type and production

Production-Type index(PTI)

  • Combines yield and type evaluations into a single value

  • There are 2 versions:

    • PTI 2:1, weights 2 production : 1 type

    • PTI 1:2, weights 2 type : 1 production


How accurate are evaluations l.jpg

How Accurate are Evaluations?

  • Reliability measures the amount of information contributing to an evaluation

  • Increases as daughters are added (at decreasing rate)

  • Also affected by:

    • Number of contemporaries

    • Reliability of parents’ evaluations

    • Heritability


Accuracy of evaluations l.jpg

Accuracy of Evaluations

  • Does kidding in same season

    • More records  better estimate of herd-year-season (hys) effect

  • Bucks with daughters having records in same hys

    • More direct comparisons  better ranking of bucks

  • Number of lactation records

  • Number of daughters

  • Completeness of pedigree data


Methods of expressing evaluations l.jpg

Methods of Expressing Evaluations

  • Estimated breeding value (EBV)

    • Animal’s own genetic value

  • Predicted transmitting ability (PTA)

    • ½ EBV

    • Expected contribution to progeny


Heritability l.jpg

Heritability

  • Portion of total variation due to genetics

    • Milk, Fat, Protein: 25%

    • Range for Type: 19% (r. udder arch) — 52% (stature)


Usda dairy goat evaluations l.jpg

USDA Dairy Goat Evaluations

  • Evaluations for milk, fat, protein, and type

  • Yield evaluations in July

    Type evaluations in November

  • Evaluations provided to ADGA, DRPC, and public via the Internet (aipl.arsusda.gov)


What do the numbers mean l.jpg

What Do the Numbers Mean?

  • Evaluations are predictions

    • The true value is unknown

  • The predictions rank animals relative to one another using a defined base

  • The base is the zero- or center-point for evaluations

    • For example: the performance of animals born in a given year


Trend in breeding value for milk l.jpg

Trend in Breeding Value for Milk

Available: http://aipl.arsusda.gov/eval/summary/goats.cfm?trnd_tbl=AIm


Ways to increase rate of improvement l.jpg

Ways to Increase Rate of Improvement

  • Use artificial insemination (AI) to use better males in more herds

  • Identify promising young males for progeny testing (PT)

    • Use on a representative group of does and observe the actual success of progeny

  • Focus on larger herds to improve accuracy


Factors affecting value of data l.jpg

Factors Affecting Value of Data

  • Completeness of ID and parentage reporting

  • Years herd on test

  • Size of herd

  • Frequency of testing and component determination


Why evaluations go wrong l.jpg

Why Evaluations Go Wrong

  • Important factors ignored

    • Litter size

    • Milking Frequency

    • Preferential treatment

  • Unlucky

    • Current data not representative of future data

    • Traits with low heritability require large numbers to be accurate

  • Recording errors

    • Wrong daughters assigned to a sire


Dairy cattle program for genetic improvement l.jpg

Dairy Cattle Program for Genetic Improvement

  • Artificial insemination (AI)

    • Allows for many progeny from superior males

    • Allows semen to be used in geographically diverse locations

  • Progeny testing (PT)

    • Use young males to get a representative group of daughters

    • Wait until those daughters are milking

    • Based on the evaluations, return the best males to heavy use


Dairy cattle program for genetic improvement cont l.jpg

Dairy Cattle Program for Genetic Improvement (Cont.)

  • Pre-select only promising bulls for PT

  • Select only the best of the PT bulls for widespread use

    • Only about 1 in 10 PT bulls enter active service

  • Remove bulls from active service as better new bulls become available

    • Bulls remain active only a few years


Alternative to waiting for pt l.jpg

Alternative to Waiting for PT

  • Use young bucks for most breedings

  • Replace bucks quickly

  • Bank semen of young bucks

  • Use frozen semen from superior proven bucks as sires of next generation of young bucks


Recent changes to system l.jpg

Recent Changes to System

  • Web query for accessing data by animal name

  • Yield data since 1998 extracted from the master file each run

    • Incorporates corrections, deletions, and ID changes

  • Standardized yields back to 1974 available


Recent changes to system cont l.jpg

Recent Changes to System (Cont.)

  • Added Breed codes

    • CC – Sable

    • ND – Nigerian Dwarf

  • ID simplified by removing G and 18 prefixes when not required for uniqueness

  • More complete breeding information stored


Possible enhancements l.jpg

Possible Enhancements

  • Add evaluations for more traits

    • Productive Life

    • Somatic Cell Score

    • Daughter Pregnancy Rate

  • Switch to test day model

    • Provides better accounting for environment

    • Accounts for genetic differences in shape of lactation curve


Future l.jpg

Future

  • DNA analysis

    • Parentage verification

    • Genetic evaluation

      • Genomic information may enable reasonably accurate evaluation at birth

  • National Animal Identification System (NAIS)

    • May cause changes in ID


Genomic data l.jpg

Genomic Data

  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP)

    • Large number of markers with 2 alleles

    • Tags segments of chromosomes

  • Parentage verification

    • Marker alleles must match those of a parent

    • Often can infer unknown parent ID

  • EBV calculated for chromosome segments

    • Sum the value of segments to approximate evaluation

    • Accuracy may approach progeny test


Conclusions l.jpg

Conclusions

  • Genetic evaluations are available for type and production

  • Traits can be improved through selection

  • Rate of improvement increases with accuracy of evaluations

  • AI enables widespread use of superior bucks and enables PT bucks to be used across herds


Conclusions cont l.jpg

Conclusions (cont.)

  • Genetic evaluations improve selection accuracy

  • Accurate evaluations also require adequate data and an appropriate model

  • Evaluations are based on comparisons

    • Differences for non-genetic reasons must be removed

  • DNA technology is of great interest

    • Still requires reliable evaluations


Aipl web services l.jpg

AIPL web services

http://aipl.arsusda.gov/query/public/tdb.shtml#GoatsTBL

  • Queries provide display of:

    • Pedigree information

    • Yield records

    • Herd test characteristics

    • Genetic evaluations of does & bucks

      • Yield

      • Type

  • Access information using:

    • ID number

    • Animal name

    • Herd code


  • Login