1 / 24

Language

Language. 1. The speech sounds (phonemics). -phones, phonemes, formants. Language. 1. The speech sounds (phonemics). -phones, phonemes, formants. Language. 1. The speech sounds (phonemics). -phones, phonemes, formants. Language. 1. The speech sounds (phonemics).

fgray
Download Presentation

Language

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language 1. The speech sounds (phonemics) -phones, phonemes, formants

  2. Language 1. The speech sounds (phonemics) -phones, phonemes, formants

  3. Language 1. The speech sounds (phonemics) -phones, phonemes, formants

  4. Language 1. The speech sounds (phonemics) -phones, phonemes, formants -phonemic boundaries and the segmentation problem

  5. Language 1. The speech sounds (phonemics) -phones, phonemes, formants -infant development of speech -coarticulation -categorical perception

  6. Top-down processing of language -necessary due to the noisy and variable nature of the stimulus -e.g.: coarticulation -luckily, we tend to engage in categorical perception of phonemes (pah-bah example) -you will hear an 80 msec noise shot prededing the “aw” phoneme -subsequent presentations will reduce the noise by 10 msec

  7. Evidence of top-down/contextual processing: 1) at the phonemic level: phonemic restoration effect 2) At the word level: words in/out of context 3) “context” refers to ANYTHING the brain can use: McGurk effect

  8. Evidence of top-down/contextual processing: 1) at the phonemic level: phonemic restoration effect 2) At the word level: words in/out of context 3) “context” refers to ANYTHING the brain can use: McGurk effect

  9. Top-down processing of language -necessary due to the noisy and variable nature of the stimulus -e.g.: coarticulation -luckily, we tend to engage in categorical perception of phonemes (b-d-g, or pah-bah example)

  10. Evidence of top-down/contextual processing: 1) at the phonemic level: phonemic restoration effect 2) At the word level: words in/out of context 3) “context” refers to ANYTHING the brain can use: McGurk effect 4) This process has limits (thick accents) but learning can occur (Brad)

  11. Language mechanism is almost too flexible…latches onto anything e.g.: Ghost voices

  12. These mistakes are a small price to pay for the flexibility you buy This flexibility is a necessity given the variable and noisy nature of the stimulus

  13. Musical Mondegreens One common place our processors often go astray:

  14. Sentence structure: syntax and semantics Chomsky’s “Transformational Grammar” -sentences consist of a surface and deep structure -analyse sentences into functional components: (noun phrases, verb phrases, object phrases, etc) to discern meaning -in other words, surface structure aids in getting to deep -one problem: sometimes that isn’t possible -e.g.: “The shooting of the hunters was terrible” “visiting relative can be incredibly annoying” -transformational grammar theories postulate the rules used to go from deep to surface or the other way around (these days referred to as “logical form” and “phonetic form”

  15. Case Grammar -based on Chomsky’s notion of parsing into functional phrases -phrases are created on a word-by-word basis, with ‘late closure’ -accounts for our perception of ‘garden path’ sentences e.g.: The cotton shirts are made from comes from Arizona Seeing this as an adjective instead of a noun (and the subject of the sentence) is the problem e.g.2: The horse raced past the barn fell. Seeing this as the main verb of the sentence, instead of as a past participle, is the problem. The man shot outside the convenience store died. Separate from this ‘local structure’, there is the idea that global structure plays a role

  16. Separate from ‘local structure’, there is the idea that global structure plays a role e.g.: balloon example

  17. Reading -on average, only 1/3 of words are fixated -factors that influence likelihood of skipping a word: 1) Predictability 2) Word frequency 3) Word length -what about speed reading?

  18. Language deficits -production (Broca’s area) (Wernicke’s area) -receptive -conduction (arcuate fasciculus) -transcortical sensory -anomia -agraphia -alexia -dyslexia

  19. Theories of speech perception 1. Speech is “special” (modular) -only humans can speak -only humans can truly understand language -perception is fast, categorical, precise, effortless -development seems largely biologically determined

  20. Theories of speech perception 1. Speech is “special” (modular) 2. Speech isn’t special (pdp/nonmodular) -speed issue depends on the unit of perception (phone? phoneme?) -categorical perception not as strong as we might think -it is this debate that led researchers to seek for evidence of language in animals

  21. Animal language 1) do animals naturally use language? -many species examined, not much success John Lilly and dolphin vocalizations

  22. Animal language 1) do animals naturally use language? 2) Can we teach animals to talk?

  23. Animal language 1) do animals naturally use language? 2) Can we teach animals to talk? -was there anything with peer-reviewed publications supporting it? -Irene Pepperberg and Alex -Alan and Beatrix Gardner and Washoe

More Related