1 / 22

Physician Assisted Death: Challenges for Hospice and Palliative Care

Physician Assisted Death: Challenges for Hospice and Palliative Care. Nuala Kenny, OC, MD, FRCP(C) Professor Emeritus Department of Bioethics Dalhousie University Ethics & Health Policy Advisor Catholic Health Alliance of Canada. Historical Perspectives on Physician Assisted Death (PAD).

ferris
Download Presentation

Physician Assisted Death: Challenges for Hospice and Palliative Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Physician Assisted Death: Challenges for Hospice and Palliative Care Nuala Kenny, OC, MD, FRCP(C) Professor Emeritus Department of Bioethics Dalhousie UniversityEthics & Health Policy Advisor Catholic Health Alliance of Canada

  2. Historical Perspectives on Physician Assisted Death (PAD) • Longstanding prohibition • Origins of ‘the right to die’-Quinlan case • Refusal of treatment • Now-patients’ rights and autonomy issue • “The right to die as the triumph of autonomy” Beauchamp, 2006 JMed & Philosophy • Today, claims to the ‘right’ to control the circumstances of one’s death AND to • Oblige another (physician) to assist

  3. Some International Experience • Oregon & Washington State • PAS • Netherlands & Luxembourg • Euthanasia and PAS • Switzerland-2002 Penal Code • AS • UK actively debating the issue

  4. Current State of End of Life Care-Canada • Refusal of Rx by competent patients allowed • Withdrawal/withholding of non-beneficial Rx • Drugs for pain control (Rodriguez Case) • PAS illegal (Sec 241b of Criminal Code) • Euthanasia illegal (Sec.229 of Criminal Code) • Bill C-384 introduced to Parliament -3rd time

  5. Bill C-384 • Allows a person to legally request assisted suicide • “free & informed consent”; appears to be lucid; 18>;written request x2; alternatives presented • Any person in “severe physical or mental pain without any prospect of relief” or “suffering from a terminal illness”

  6. Some Arguments For PhysicianAssisted Suicide • Respect for patient autonomy • Equality- Charter of Rights and Freedoms • Rejection of relevant ethical distinctions • Duty to relieve pain and suffering-non abandonment • PAD is occurring; better to regulate

  7. Some Arguments Against Physician Assisted Death • Respect for autonomy does not ‘trump’ all • There are clear moral/ethical distinctions • PAD is incompatible with physicians’ duties • Killing is not an act of medicine • PAD is not necessary for good EOL care • Effective palliative care for pain and symptoms • Slippery slopes are real

  8. Assisted Death: Special Challenges for Hospice and Palliative Care

  9. Hospice & Palliative Care (H&PC):Implications Of the Legalization of PAD • Many of the requests will come in/to H&PC • 50% of hospice nurses have had a request • Ganzini et al 2008 Palliative Medicine; 22:659-667 • Hospice and palliative care staff and supporters need to have an accurate and sophisticated understanding of the arguments • The special implications for hospice and palliative care need careful scrutiny

  10. Is Assisted Suicide a Component of Palliative Care? • Swiss Palliative Care Society-18% yes • German “ “ “ -25% yes • UK Association for Palliative Medicine-8% • North America debate • For Quill, Battin • Against Foley, Hendin

  11. Hospice and Palliative Care: Philosophy of Care • Hospice & Palliative Care • WHO & European Union Palliative Care Association definitions • -hospice/palliative care “neither hastens death nor prolongs dying” • Share a concern for returning dying to the natural • Affirm the goals of medicine in end of life care • Pain & symptom control AND the “last things” • Recognizes the distinction between pain & suffering

  12. Crucial Issues for Palliative Care • Many already confuse palliative care with euthanasia • “Assistance in dying”- IS palliative care; PAD is assistance in death • “Death with dignity”-the importance of dignity in palliative care (e.g.Chochinov et al) • Polls showing public support for PAD but very confused answers

  13. Clarifying Terminology • Withdrawing/Withholding • Non-beneficial/futile Rx (not care!) • Not ‘passive euthanasia • Physician-Assisted Death • Assisted suicide – intentionally killing oneself with the assistance (i.e., the provision of knowledge and/or means) of a physician • Euthanasia – an act undertaken by a physician with the intention of ending the life of another person to relieve that person’s suffering • Voluntary and involuntary

  14. The Importance of Distinctions • Killing vs “letting die” • Culpability-motive, intention & nature of the act • Unrealistic notions of the power of medicine • Withdrawing/withholding • Beneficial vs non-beneficial and harmful interventions • Pain control and “double effect” • Empirical evidence regarding pain control-effectiveness and NOT death-hastening • Terminal sedation

  15. Less common concerns of those who elected to die Burden on family/ friends/caregivers (37%) Inadequate pain control or concern about pain (22%) Financial implications of treatment (3%) Most common concerns of those who elected to die Losing autonomy (86%) Less able to engage in activities that make life enjoyable (85%) Losing dignity (83%) Losing control of bodily functions (57%) Good EOL Care & PAD:Reasons for Request (Oregon)

  16. Requests for AD-A Systematic ReviewHudson et al Palliative Medicine 2006; 20: 693-701. • Requests common in those with advanced illness • Will to live correlated more with anxiety and depression than physical symptoms • Multiple issues cause patient’s suffering. Suffering takes time to understand • Depression is more common in those who request AD

  17. Profiles of Persons Requesting AD • Requests based on fear of the future • Exhaustion/burnout from the illness • Desire to control an out of control process • Patients with significant depression • Patients with a firm belief that it is their right to choose the manner and time of their death. • Zylicz 2002 in Foley & Hendin The CaseAgainst Assisted Suicide: For The Right to End of Life Care.

  18. Slippery Slopes • Some believe careful legislation can guard against “slippery slopes” • Empirical data on AD from Oregon (0.09% of deaths), Switzerland (0.45%) the Netherlands (0.3% AS; 1-8% all AD) does not support some of the dramatic claims • However, slippery slopes are real • Even if legalized for competent persons on the basis of autonomy, there will be substantial shifts in thinking regarding all aspects of EOL care for all persons

  19. Slippery Slopes • Starts with competent patient autonomy • Alters profoundly relationship between physician duty & patient autonomy • Cannot be logically confined to terminal illness or EOL care • Examples of empirical slippery slopes • The “duty to die” • AD for “life fatigue” • The Dutch dementia debate • The Groningen protocol-euthanzising handicapped newborns

  20. Dilemmas Experienced by H&PC Staff Regarding a Request for AD • Responsibility for pain & symptom control • Patient autonomy questioned • AD contradictory to philosophy of H&PC • Missed opportunity for spiritual transformation • Concerns re interfering with autonomy when trying to help redefine quality & dignity • Conflicts over advocacy when patient & family disagree on AD • Harvath et al J Hosp Pall Nursing 2006; 8:200-09

  21. Conclusions From The Swiss Experience-Pereira et al. • AD is contrary to the philosophy of H&PC • Allowing AD further confuses the public re H&PC • AD distresses many patients and families • AD presents distress to many practitioners • PC becomes a gatekeeper & perhaps “dumping ground” for AD • The dynamics of care change with AD

  22. Some BIG Challenges for H&PC • Dramatic slippery slope cautions regarding the most vulnerable have not been borne out in Oregon; some concerns in the Netherlands but • PAD is about patient autonomy not intractable symptoms in terminal and EOL care • Profound consequences for society and health care professionals generally • Significant consequences for hospice & palliative care, in particular • PAD medicalizes dying; provides a technical ‘fix’ for suffering • Polarizes staff into those pro and con; affects “the team” • Does PC become the death specialty?

More Related