strategic partnership in crisis
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Strategic Partnership in Crisis

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Strategic Partnership in Crisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Strategic Partnership in Crisis. Dexter Whitfield Centre for Public Services May 2005. Methodology. Analysis of information on the SSP held by the Bedfordshire County Council UNISON branch.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Strategic Partnership in Crisis' - ferris-atkinson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
strategic partnership in crisis

Strategic Partnership in Crisis

Dexter Whitfield

Centre for Public Services

May 2005

  • Analysis of information on the SSP held by the Bedfordshire County Council UNISON branch.
  • Analysis of Audit Commission Best Value and Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) and OFSTED Local Education Authority (LEA) inspections.
  • A search of Bedfordshire County Council’s web site for reports and minutes of the Council, the Executive, Strategic Partnership Management Board, Scrutiny etc.
  • Semi-structured interviews with a cross section of staff and trade union representatives.
  • A review of reports and technical notes published by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister’s (ODPM) Strategic Partnering Taskforce.
  • Bedfordshire-relevant material from research reports and surveys on SSPs by the Centre for Public Services.
the partnership
The partnership
  • Between Bedfordshire County Council and HBS Business Services Group Ltd (Terra Firma - equity investment group).
  • £267m 12-year contract starting June 2001.
  • Local authority services - information technology, financial services, human resources, school support services, communications, management of outsourced contracts.
  • HBS has similar contracts in Lincolnshire, Middlesbrough, Milton Keynes and Bath.
the promises
The promises
  • A Regional Business Centre in Bedford to win additional work and create new jobs.
  • A 45 seat Customer Contact Centre for all services.
  • Investment of £7.8m in new IT, including integrated resource management system, SAP.
  • £6.9m investment to improve accommodation.
  • High quality and competitive support services to schools.
  • A review of training facilities and a National Centre for Excellence in Education.
  • Improved services to achieve upper quartile Best Value performance.
  • An annual reduction in service costs of 2% (about £900,000).
impact on services
Impact on Services

Service delivery problems

  • Performance down in the 4 Best Value Corporate health indicators.
  • No evidence of Regional Business Centre or new jobs.
  • Quality of school support services in decline.
  • National centre of Excellence in Education constantly delayed.
  • Council incurred considerable additional costs and unclear whether original savings target met.
  • Only part of £7m investment in County Hall spent.
  • “The strategic partnership is not delivering improvement in services” - District Auditor, January 2005.

HBS achievements

Customer Contact Centre and SAP implemented

additional evidence
Additional evidence
  • “The strategic partnership is not delivering improvement in services”

Annual Audit and Inspection Letter, District Audit, January 2005.

  • Failure to publish Council 2003/04 Accounts on time partly blamed on arrangements with HBS.
  • “The Council has not yet been able to gain capacity from its strategic partnership”

Comprehensive Performance Assessment, 2004, Audit Commission.

impact on jobs
Impact on Jobs
  • 550 jobs transferred to HBS in June 2001.
  • HBS employed new staff on different terms and conditions- sometimes big wage differentials.
  • Two-tier workforce and Best Value Code of Practice on Workforce Matters does not apply because contract started before March 2003.
  • HBS refuses to sign local or national recognition agreement with UNISON and other unions.
  • HBS poor record in communicating with staff.
  • Some services now being transferred back to the council from HBS.
strategic lessons
Strategic Lessons
  • Sharpen critique of partnerships - they are essentially large contracts but with a contractor in a powerful position inside the local authority.
  • Get the message across to Elected Members and the trade union membership about the limitations of partnerships.
  • Demand that the Scrutiny Committee(s) fully monitors and assesses the implementation process and all aspects of the partnership.
  • Ensure that Strategic Partnerships and PPPs are democratically accountable and transparent.
alternative to partnership
Alternative to Partnership

Original UNISON position:

  • Council should acquire hardware, software and expertise/training as and when required on ‘best in class’ basis.
  • A phased qualitative implementation of ICT involving staff and user organisations.
  • Staff remain council employees.

Advantages - builds council capacity, minimises risk and reliance on one contractor, better employment conditions, greater staff involvement, phased process learning lessons as it progresses.

  • The partnership contract with HBS should be terminated.
  • Council should adopt an incremental approach to ICT based on testing and using best-in-class suppliers.
  • In the interim period HBS should :1. negotiate a recognition agreement locally/nationally with UNISON. 2. eliminate the two-tier workforce with HBS agreeing to voluntarily abide by Code of Practice on Workforce Matters. 3. agree to full participation and consultation with staff, UNISON and other trade unions.
  • Comprehensive evaluation of contract - evidence from elected members, staff, trade unions, schools and user organisations.
  • Improve the governance and transparency of the partnership.
  • Public debate about the need, role, cost and plans for a National Centre for Educational Excellence.
  • UNISON and other trade unions should be fully involved in the service review process.