1 / 11

What we were asked to do

Interview: - All SC, Staff, & TT Convenors - Samples of all other Stakeholders Review: All main documents and web-site. To assess Relevance Efficiency Effectiveness Possible Future. What we were asked to do. The Response. 12 Developing Countries from workshops

felix
Download Presentation

What we were asked to do

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interview: - All SC, Staff, & TT Convenors - Samples of all other Stakeholders Review: All main documents and web-site To assess Relevance Efficiency Effectiveness Possible Future What we were asked to do

  2. The Response • 12 Developing Countries from workshops (25% sample), but mostly Statisticians. • All Secretariat, OECD DCD (Dev. Coopn. Directorate), Task Team Convenors • Almost All Steering Committee Members (Past and Present) & P21 Donors • Other Groups, 5-50% response

  3. P21 Impacts on Logframe Outputs • Promising 1. Increased Commitment to Statistics 4. User-Producer Dialogue 5. Nat. Stat. System Strategic Planning • Moving 2. Capacity to Produce/Use Statistics 6. Improved Collaboration among Partners • Potential 3. Partnership Principles Applied 7. Effective Donor Collaboration

  4. PARIS21 Strengths • High and Increasing Relevance (RBM/EBP) • Statistician-Policymaker Relations • Developing-Country Follow-up • Developing-Country Mutual Self-Help • Inter-Agency Studies • Neutrality and Status

  5. PARIS21 Weaknesses: New Opportunities • P21/Donor Follow-up: Regional Adviser Coordn. and Follow-up Workshops • Priority Statistics: Increased emphasis, cover UNDP/MFI assessments • Country-level Aid Coordination: P21 staff visits • Policymakers even more: High fora, and coordinate with user training • Self-evaluation: Assess workshop effects

  6. Log-Frame for Consideration: Major Outcomes • Capacity to Produce and Use Statistics • Nat. Stat. System Strategic Planning • Effective Donor Collaboration at Country Level

  7. Capacity to Produce and Use StatisticsThree Year Targets (by end-2006) • Share of IDA Countries - supplying 15 Development Indicators - subscribing to GDDS • UNDP and IDA/IMF Ratings on MDG/PRSP Monitoring/Evaluation

  8. Nat. Stat. System Strategic PlanningThree Year Targets (by end-2006) • Self-evaluations using Statistical Capacity Building Indicators, and follow-up action • Effective, sustained process for strategic planning

  9. Effective Donor Coordination, Country-levelThree Year Targets (by end 2006) • Appoint lead donor in country for statistics • Support Strategic Plans, once effective • Initiatives in Joint Donor Support • Use of Country Page on PARIS21 web-site

  10. PARIS21 Governance • Expand SC into Council, with Stronger Represent- ation of Developing Countries and Policymakers - Chairman, retd. President or Fin. Min., keen on RBM - 4 African countries - 4 countries of other regions - 3 main Regional Development Banks • Ex-officioVice-Chairman (DAC Chairman) would head 6-person Executive Committee of SC (50/50 Developing countries and OECD countries/Int’l agencies)

  11. PARIS21 Secretariat and Resources • Add to Secretariat 1 or 2 development economists and modest other additions. • Need increased donor support, particularly from those currently contributing little or not at all.

More Related