1 / 14

Life Science, Engineering, Design Enschede

Life Science, Engineering, Design Enschede. Project 2: DoE Outline project. www.saxion.nl/led. Course Design of Experiments at Saxion. Introduction-DOE in Feb 2014 Project ‘Catapult’ Feb - July 2014 Groups of 4/5 students with supervisor Sniekers Payment: 3 EC

felice
Download Presentation

Life Science, Engineering, Design Enschede

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Life Science, Engineering, Design Enschede Project 2: DoE Outline project www.saxion.nl/led

  2. Course Design of Experiments at Saxion • Introduction-DOE in Feb 2014 • Project ‘Catapult’ Feb - July 2014 • Groups of 4/5 students with supervisor Sniekers • Payment: 3 EC • Weekly introduction lecture • Feedback session at fixed time every 2 weeks • Assessment day in June ‘Proof of Quality by presentation, demonstration and report

  3. Benefit for you • You gain some • knowledge, • comprehension, • awareness, • expertise • in te field of Six Sigma and in the method of Design of Experiments in particular. It’s a opportunity to make a special mark on your engineering-degree, which could be decisive for a lot of employers.

  4. Course Design of Experiments at HTW • 1 week Introduction-DOE in April 2014 by Sniekers • Project ‘Catapult’ April - July 2014 • Groups of 4 students with supervisor HTW • Payment: 3 EC • Weekly feedback session at fixed time (Skype) • Assessment days in July ‘Proof of Quality by presentation, demonstration and report • Later more!

  5. The Project • Customer requirements: Sniekers • Process: Catapult, Trebuchet, ……….. • Goal: Hitting target with tennis balls over a distance (LSL, USL) (9,5 and 10,5 m ) • Design and build a catapult (example is available) • Gauge R&R and Design of Experiment • Find the vital factors en their optimal setting • Delivery: shooting 10 tennis balls; 2 series of 5 shots • Measure: distance (X), deviation (Y), • Determine: number of hits and defects, variance

  6. Example project Catapult • DOE with 5 Factors • Bal position • Spring right • Spring left • Buffer pin • Rotation axis

  7. Example 2013

  8. Delivery in June Which team has the best performance??? USL LSL Catapult Y • Shoot 10 tennis balls in 2 series of 5 shots • Determine: • Number of hits (defects) • Average value of X and Y: • Standard deviation in X and Y: sx, sy X

  9. Schedule ‘DOE-project’ • February: register for project in groups of 4 students • February - March: Start-up • Weekly 1hour theoretical introduction • Design and build Catapult or Trebuchet, or … • Approval!! • Select Gauge and perform Gauge R&R • April– June: DOE • Design Experiment and perform tests • Evaluate test results and determine optimal settings • July: Delivery • Review (deliver report, presentation) • Demonstrate quality Project team • Evaluation and discharge project • Individual reflection (STARR)

  10. Project Review July • Students Saxion and HTW Saarbrucken • Date and location not known yet • Project Deliverables (group): • Demonstration Catapult • Poster presentation (A3) • Power-Point Presentation (max 15 min) and evaluation • Report containing, design catapult, design experiments, data, choices and arguments, data-processing, • Individual deliverables: • Individual reflection (STARR) • Peer-evaluation

  11. Peer evaluation: Valuable feedback from your fellow students • Scale:: • 0 = normal; • + = better than normal; • ++ = much better than normal; • = worse than normal; • - = much worse than normal • Including short motivation • Aspects of feedback: • Presence • Cooperation • Contribution • Communication • Reliability (fulfilling tasks, promises) • Responsibility • Willingness to learn

  12. Individual reflection: STARR-method • Describe during and afterwards the project your own part/ contribution / learning targets with the aid of the STARR-method • S = Situation: describe the situation as concrete and precise as possible • T = Tasks: What were your tasks / parts in the project (concrete and precise)? • A = Actions and Activities: What actions and activities did you do to contribute in the project (again, concrete and precise)? How did you do that (strategy)? What problems did you come across? • R = Results: What were the concrete results of your work? • R = Reflection: How did the project go? What did you learn (knowledge, abilities)? What will you do different/the same next time? What did you come beware of and what did you learn about yourself? What feedback did you receive?

  13. Situation • What was the situation? • What happened? • Who were involved? • Where took it place? • When took it place? • Reflection • What are the knowledge and skills you’ve learned? • What will you do different/the same next time? • What did you learn about yourself? • What feedback did you receive • About what issues were you satisfied? • What do you still have to learn? • What do you need for this? • Task • project: • What was your task / part? • What role did you have? • What was expected of you? • Personal: • What did you want to accomplish? • What did you expect of yourself in this project? • What did you think you should do? STARR • Results • What were the results of your work? • How did your contribution fit in the total picture • How is your work appreciated? • Action & Activities • What did you exactly do in this project? • What ideas did you bring in? • What problems came across? • What was your strategy?

  14. Questions?

More Related