1 / 15

Barriers to and Benefits of CVET for Older Employees

Barriers to and Benefits of CVET for Older Employees. Kurt Schmid. Outlook. Is age really an important factor for training participation? (Austrian data) Benefits of CVET (esp. for older employees) Companies views about training of older employees

felice
Download Presentation

Barriers to and Benefits of CVET for Older Employees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Barriers to and Benefits of CVET for Older Employees Kurt Schmid

  2. Outlook • Is age really an important factor for training participation? (Austrian data) • Benefits of CVET (esp. for older employees) • Companies views about training of older employees • Hints and open questions about what drives labour market participation of older people • Based on 4 Austrian & 1 Eurostat datasets: • Austrian Labour Force Survey 2003 ad hoc module LLL • ibw-survey of participants of external CVET courses in 2008 (n = 1.120) • Ibw-survey of training-inactive employees in 2008 (n = 600) • ibw-company survey in 2008 (n = 500) • Eurostat data on training & labour market participation

  3. Age-specific shares of employees in Austria: Interest, participation and degree of realisation in further training Source: Austrian Labour Force Survey 2003 ad-hoc module LLL; ibw-calculations

  4. Age-specific EU-25 participation rates informal, non-formal and informal training (in % of 25 to 64 years old) Source: Eurostat, EU Labour Force Survey 2005

  5. Logistic Regression: influencing variableson CVET participation for Austria & significant economic sector difference!!! Source: Austrian Labour Force Survey 2003 ad-hoc module LLL; ibw-calculations

  6. Age-specific degree of affirmation (averages) to statements about reasons why respondents did not participate in CVET Source: ibw-survey of training-inactive employees 2008; ibw-calculations

  7. Reasons for non-participation in CVET Source: ibw-survey of training-inactive employees 2008; ibw-calculations

  8. Outcomes of CVET participation I Source: ibw-survey of training-inactive employees 2008; ibw-calculations

  9. Outcomes of CVET participation II: wage effects Source: ibw-WIFI-survey of participants 2008; ibw-calculations

  10. Companies views about training of older employees I • on average a person is deemed to be an “older employee” if he/she is about 45 years old – yet, pronounced sector differences • Majority thinks that both can profit from training them until or rather close to retirement, i.e. participants as well as companies will gain. • Yet, many companies (about two out of three) made the experience that older employees (compared to younger ones)… • usually have a lower willingness for further training, • are harder to motivate to participate in further training activities, • have different training needs, • need specific incentives for training participation. • There are four arguments companies express why – in their view – older employees often have a lower willingness for further training: • Older employees simply see no need for it and/or they think training will not pay off for them (because they come close to their retirement). • Older employees often argue that they are more experienced and therefore their skills and competences are sufficient. • Fears of failure are more pronounced among older employees (especially in connection with new technologies). • A general decrease of motivation as well as physical/psychical/emotional exhaustion.

  11. Companies views about training of older employees II Company views about learning aptitude of older employees: About half of the enterprises think that learning aptitude of older employees is lower than those of younger ones – the other half sees no differences. Interestingly, there are large inter- as well as intra-sector variances to that aspect. widespread beliefs, perceptions and ascriptions about older people’s (allegedly) lower learning aptitude and motivation still exist.

  12. Relationship between non-formal training participation and labour market participation of older people (55 to 64 years) in Europe Source: Eurostat, EU Labour Force Survey 2005, 2006 or 2007; ibw-calculations

  13. Relationship between non-formal training participation and labour market participation of older people (55 to 64 years) in Europe Source: Eurostat, EU Labour Force Survey 2005, 2006 or 2007; ibw-calculations

  14. Conclusions CVT participation of older employees gains importance because of demographic trends. But according to training and employment data at EU-level: is there really a (simple) causal link between training and employment of older people? For most European states country-specific regulations (e.g. legal and actual retirement ages, replacement rates, labour market for older employees etc.) seem to be more important for labour market participation than further training participation. Beside it is not clear how causality runs: is training participation fostering employability and labour market participation of older people or do countries with a higher share of older people in employment also train them more? This does not mean that training will be useless. As training data for Austria shows, decisions to participate in CVET as well as outcomes of these training efforts are complex phenomena and are simultaneously influenced by a multitude of factors like educational level, occupational status, company environments and individual cost-benefit considerations. Chronological age on its own is not a relevant barrier to CVET participation, nor does it impede training outcomes up to about age 55. What can be observed are large age effects when employees come close to retirement: Five to ten years before retirement interest as well as participation rates for CVET decrease sharply despite positive training outcomes for those older employees participating in further training. There still exist widespread perceptions and ascriptions of age (e.g. lower aptitude and/or willingness for learning). Individual survey data from training-inactive employees indicate that older and younger employees do not differ much when reasons for their non-participation are looked at. What really makes a difference between these two groups is the closeness to retirement and the (often combined) view that there is no longer a need for training as well as uncertainties about the realisation potential of training participation. One way of fostering training participation of older employees seems therefore to provide better mediate that employees will benefit from successful training efforts even if training is undertaken close to retirement age.

  15. ThanX a lot 4 Your patience !!!schmid@ibw.at

More Related