Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 36

Couple Prevalence: 62% PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 49 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent Psychological Aggression (50 th & 80 th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2 nd National Family Violence Survey. Female. Male. 50th Percentile. Couple Prevalence: 62%. Couple Prevalence: 17%. %. Dyadic Concordance Types Type.

Download Presentation

Couple Prevalence: 62%

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent Psychological Aggression (50th & 80th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2ndNational Family Violence Survey

Female

Male

50th Percentile

Couple Prevalence:

62%

Couple Prevalence:

17%

%

Dyadic Concordance Types Type

Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners  In A National Sample Of  American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Psychological Aggression

As Reported By 481 University Students

Prevalence

Men: 11%

Women: 9%

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents

Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Assault Types for Psychological Aggression

As Reported By 5,219 Spanish High School Students

Prevalence

Men= 92%

Women= 96%

%

Female Respondents

Male Respondents

Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dyOf Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types of Psychological Aggression By 202 Couples

In First Year Of Marriage

Prevalence 36%

Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of psychological aggression

Cut point for Psychological Aggression: 3 or more times in past year

%

Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Any Psychological Aggression

As Reported By 1,157 University Students

Prevalence

Short: 62%

Full: 79%

%

Short Form

Full Form

Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Severe Psychological Aggression

As Reported By 1,157 University Students

Prevalence

Short: 7%

Full: 17%

%

Short Form

Full Form

Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.


Couple prevalence 62

Low income, adolescent girls (n = 155), ages 14–18.

Volpe, Ellen M., Thomas L. Hardie, and Catherine Cerulli. 2012. "Associations among Depressive Symptoms, Dating Violence, and Relationship Power in Urban, Adolescent Girls." Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing:n/a-n/a.


Couple prevalence 62

The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China

Juan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &

Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang

194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration

Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion

As Reported By National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

Prevalence

Couple: 11%

%

Female Respondents

Hess, K. L., Javanbakht, M., Brown, J. M., Weiss, R. E., Hsu, P., & Gorbach, P. M. (2013). Intimate Partner Violence and Anal Intercourse In Young Adult Heterosexual Relationships. [Article]. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(1), 6-12. doi: 10.1363/4500613


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types For Sexual Coercion By 202 Couples

In First Year Of Marriage

Prevalence 55%

Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of coercion

%

Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Concordance Types for Past Year Sexual Coercion

Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

Couple Prevalence According to:

Men: 23%

Women: 19%

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents

Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Concordance Types for Sexual Coercion, Lifetime

Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

Couple Prevalence According to:

Men: 14%

Women: 11%

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents

Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Assault Types for Sexual Coercion

As Reported By 2016 Spanish High School Students

Prevalence

Men= 27%

Women= 11%

%

Female Respondents

Male Respondents

Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dyOf Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion

As Reported By 388 Married Couples in China

Prevalence

Couple: 55%

%

Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, S.-M., Sze, Y., & Fang, X. (2011). The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion

As Reported By Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women

Prevalence

Women: %

%

Female Respondents

Temple, J. R., Weston, R., & Marshall, L. L. (2005). Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Women in Nonviolent, Unilaterally Violent, and Mutually Violent Relationships. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 335-359. doi: 10.1891/088667005780997947


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion

As Reported By 1,157 University Students

Prevalence

Short: 13%

Full: 20%

%

Short Form

Full Form

Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types forSevere Sexual Coercion

As Reported By 1,157 University Students

Prevalence

Short: 2.3%

Full: 4.6%

%

Short Form

Full Form

Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion

As Reported By 481 University Students

Prevalence

Men: 31%

Women: 27%

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents

Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Lifetime Forced-Sex By High School Students

(1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey, N = 2,923)

Prevalence

Men 14%

Women 26%

NOTE: These data do not refer to dating couples and therefore are not DTs

High rates because of lifetime and not restricted to partners. But check what is forced sex

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents

Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe dating violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American journal of preventive medicine, 19(4), 220-227.


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students IN 32 Nations

Prevalence

Men %

Women %

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents


Couple prevalence 62

Dyadic Types for Verbal Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students

IN 32 Nations

Prevalence

Men 14%

Women 26%

%

Male Respondents

Female Respondents


Couple prevalence 62

Childhood Sexual Abuse

Prevalence %Men Wom

Childhood sexual abuse 8% 5%

Partner abuse 43% 50%

% of childhood sexual abuse

* Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner

Dyadic Abuse Type

Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007

Table 2.


Couple prevalence 62

Childhood Sexual Abuse

Prevalence %

Men Wom

Childhood sexual abuse 8% 5%

Partner abuse 43% 50%

% of childhood sexual abuse

* Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner

Dyadic Abuse Type

Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007

Table 2.


Couple prevalence 62

Grades 9-12)

Coker 2000 NOTE: THESE DATA DO NOT REFER TO DATING COUPLES AND THERE FORE CANNOT BE PART OF THE DT TABULATION


Couple prevalence 62

The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China

Juan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &

Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang

194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration

Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible


Couple prevalence 62

  • Chronicity

  • Fathers and Mothers: When violence between parents occurred

    • Violent fathers: 75% - two or more times that year

    • Violent mothers: 73% - two or more times that year.

  • Dyadic Aggression Types

    • Father-Only type: 65 % assaulted two or more times

    • Mother-Only type: 59% two or more times that year

    • Both-Violent type: 80% of the fathers and 80% of mothers

  • Typical pattern

    • Two or more times rather than an isolated incident

  • Straus, M.A . and Michel-Smith, Y. 2012. "Mutuality, Severity, And Chronicity Of Exposure To Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations." Presented at International Family Violence And Child Victimization Research Conference. Sheraton Harborside Hotel, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 9 July 2012. IPS02


    Couple prevalence 62

    • Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students


    Couple prevalence 62

    • Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students


    Couple prevalence 62

    Taylor Study

    I think the three bar charts were made from one of these two Tables, but I am not sure. In addition, I am not sure it is correct


    Couple prevalence 62

    Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.


    Couple prevalence 62

    Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.


    Couple prevalence 62

    Use of Alcohol or Other Drugs

    %

    Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent


    Couple prevalence 62

    Depression Rates

    %

    Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent


    Couple prevalence 62

    Father Ever In Jail

    As Reported By Father’s and Mother’s

    %

    Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent


  • Login