Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 50

Meeting the Needs of the Community: A System for Redesigning Care PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 79 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Meeting the Needs of the Community: A System for Redesigning Care. Mike Hindmarsh Hindsight Healthcare Strategies Steven J. Bernstein University of Michigan Ann Arbor VAMC Winslow Lecture Battle Creek, MI 9 October 2007. Overview. Mike Hindmarsh Burden of chronic illness

Download Presentation

Meeting the Needs of the Community: A System for Redesigning Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Meeting the Needs of the Community: A System for Redesigning Care

Mike Hindmarsh

Hindsight Healthcare Strategies

Steven J. Bernstein

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor VAMC

Winslow Lecture

Battle Creek, MI

9 October 2007


Overview

Overview

  • Mike Hindmarsh

    • Burden of chronic illness

    • Chronic care model

    • Research findings

  • Steven J. Bernstein

    • Model for Improvement

    • Quality improvement approaches

    • Application of the chronic care model


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Mrs. C – We all know one

  • Ms. C is a 68yo woman with cough and shortness of breath and risk factors for Type II diabetes. She calls her doctor who cannot see her until the following week.

  • Two days later she is hospitalized with shortness of breath. She is diagnosed with “CHF”, discharged on captopril and a “no added salt diet” with encouragement to see her MD in three weeks

  • When she sees her MD, he does not have information about the hospitalization

  • PE reveals rales, S3 gallop, edema and possible depression

  • Ms. C is told she has “a little heart failure”, encouraged not to add salt, and Captopril is increased. Her depression is not addressed.

  • She is told to call back if she is no better

  • Two weeks later Ms. C calls 911 because of severe breathlessness and is admitted.

  • Fuller history in the hospital reveals that she has been taking the Captopril "as needed" because it seems “strong”, and she has never added salt to her diet, so her diet hasn’t changed.

  • Further tests reveal elevated blood glucose. She is warned of impending diabetes.

  • She is discharged feeling ill and frightened.


Four biggest worries about having a chronic illness age 50

Four Biggest Worries About Having A Chronic Illness (Age 50 +)

  • Losing independence

  • Being a burden to family or friends

  • Affording medical care


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

The Increasing Burden of Chronic Illness

For example: Patients with diabetes have

* Arthritis (34%), obesity (28%), hypertension (23%),cardiovascular (20%), lung (17%)

** Physical (31%), pain (28%), emotional (16%), daily activities (16%)

*** Eating/weight (39%), joint pain (32%), sleep (25%), dizzy/fatigue (23%), foot (21%), backache (20%)


Differences between acute and chronic conditions holman et al 2000

Differences between acute and chronic conditions (Holman et al, 2000)


Systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve

Systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve

The Watchword


Problems with current disease management efforts

Problems with Current Disease Management Efforts

  • Emphasis on physician, not system, behavior

  • Lack of integration across care settings hindering quality care

  • Characteristics of successful interventions weren’t being categorized usefully

  • Commonalities across chronic conditions unappreciated


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Chronic Care Model

Community

Health System

Health Care Organization

Resources and Policies

ClinicalInformationSystems

Self-Management Support

DeliverySystem

Design

Decision

Support

Prepared,

Proactive

Practice Team

Informed,

Activated

Patient

Productive

Interactions

Improved Outcomes


Model development 1993

Model Development 1993 --

  • Initial experience at GHC

  • Literature review

  • RWJF Chronic Illness Meeting -- Seattle

  • Review and revision by advisory committee of 40 members (32 active participants)

  • Interviews with 72 nominated “best practices”, site visits to selected group

  • Model applied with diabetes, depression, asthma, CHF, CVD, arthritis, and geriatrics


Essential element of good chronic illness care

Essential Element of Good Chronic Illness Care

Informed,

Activated

Patient

Prepared

Practice

Team

Productive

Interactions


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

What is a productive interaction?

Prepared

Practice

Team

Informed,

Activated

Patient

Productive

Interactions

  • Assessment of self-management skills and confidence as well as clinical status

  • Tailoring of clinical management by stepped protocol

  • Collaborative goal-setting and problem-solving resulting in a shared care plan

  • Active, sustained follow-up


Self management support

Self-Management Support

  • Emphasize the patient's central role

  • Use effective self-management support strategies that include assessment, goal-setting, action planning, problem-solving, and follow-up

  • Organize resources to provide support


Delivery system design

Delivery System Design

  • Define roles and distribute tasks amongst team members

  • Use planned interactions to support evidence-based care

  • Provide clinical case management services

  • Ensure regular follow-up

  • Give care that patients understand and that fits their culture


Decision support

Decision Support

  • Embed evidence-based guidelines into daily clinical practice

  • Integrate specialist expertise and primary care

  • Use proven provider education methods

  • Share guidelines and information with patients


Clinical information system

ClinicalInformation System

  • Provide reminders for providers and patients

  • Identify relevant patient subpopulations for proactive care

  • Facilitate individual patient care planning

  • Share information with providers and patients

  • Monitor performance of team and system


Health care organization

Health Care Organization

  • Visibly support improvement at all levels, starting with senior leaders

  • Promote effective improvement strategies aimed at comprehensive system change

  • Encourage open and systematic handling of problems

  • Provide incentives based on quality of care

  • Develop agreements for care coordination


Community resources and policies

Community Resources and Policies

  • Encourage patients to participate in effective programs

  • Form partnerships with community organizations to support or develop programs

  • Advocate for policies to improve care


Advantages of a general system change model

Advantages of a General System Change Model

  • Applicable to primary and secondary preventive issues, prenatal and pediatric, mental health and other age-related chronic care issues

  • Once system changes in place, accommodating new guideline or innovation much easier

  • Fits well with other redesign initiatives – such as improved access

  • Approach is being used comprehensively in multiple care settings and countries


Research and qi findings about the chronic care model

Research and QI Findings about The Chronic Care Model


The evidence

The Evidence

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to improve chronic care

  • Studies of the relationship between organizational characteristics & quality improvement

  • Evaluations of the use of the CCM in Quality Improvement

  • RCTs of CCM-based interventions

  • Cost-effectiveness studies


The ihp chronic care collaborative

The IHP Chronic Care Collaborative

  • 15 participating practice teams

  • 6 months into process

  • Process measures moving; clinical outcomes close behind

  • Broad acceptance of QI process among team members

  • Spreading successful change is next step.


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

The Mrs. C We Want to Know

  • Mrs. C is discharged after her first bout of breathlessness with information about CHF, risk factors for diabetes, and assurance of rapid PCP follow-up

  • The discharge nurse notes Mrs. C’s conditions and care in the EHR and then sends an email to PCP’s office about her recent hospitalization.

  • The PCP's nurse ensures the physician sees the information; calls Mrs. C to schedule a follow-up within 48 hours; and adds her to the care team’s registry which prompts team to her future care needs.

  • Mrs. C is scheduled for 30 minutes: 15 minutes with her physician and 15 minutes with the nurse. The physician explains CHF and diabetes to her. He orders the appropriate tests for diabetes and assures her that all will be fine recognizing her fear. He closes the loop with her to make sure she understood his recommendations and then briefly explained the concept of self-management support.

  • Mrs. C then visits with the nurse who steps her through a collaborative goal setting and action planning process. While Mrs. C is a bit overwhelmed, she is assured that her care team will follow-up in the next couple of days by phone to make sure she understands her clinical and self-management care plan and to report on the results of diabetes test.

  • The nurse calls within 48 hours and informs Mrs. C that she should be able to manageher blood sugar by better diet and exercise. She reviews the CHF medications with Mrs. C and adjust dosage since it seems to be bothering her.

  • She is scheduled for a follow-up visit in one week to discuss her blood glucose in moredepth and encouraged to call her team with any concerns or symptoms in the meantime.

  • Mrs. C understands the hard work she needs to do to manage her conditions but is thankful for such a caring team.


Overview1

Overview

  • Mike Hindmarsh

    • Burden of chronic illness

    • Chronic care model

    • Research findings

  • Steven J. Bernstein

    • Model for Improvement

    • Quality Improvement Approaches

    • Application of the chronic care model


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

For every problem, there is a solution that is simple,

neat, and wrong.

- H.L. Mencken


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Model for Improvement

What are we trying toaccomplish?

How will we know thatachange is an improvement?

What change can we make thatwill result in improvement?

Act

Plan

Study

Do

From: Associates in Process Improvement


Repeated use of the pdsa cycle

Model for Improvement

What are we trying toaccomplish?

How will we know thatachange is an improvement?

What change can we make thatwill result in improvement?

A

P

S

D

D

S

P

A

A

P

S

D

A

P

S

D

Repeated Use of the PDSA Cycle

Changes that result in improvement

Implementationof Change

Wide-Scale Tests of Change

Follow-up Tests

Hunches Theories, Ideas

Very Small Scale Test

From: Associates in Process Improvement


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

…if only they had done more PDSA cycles...


Quality improvement efforts

Quality Improvement Efforts

R Grol. JAMA 2001:284:2578-85


Interventions and their targets

Interventions and their targets

Ann Intern Med 2002;136:642


Effectiveness of strategies to improve physician performance

Effectiveness of strategies to improve physician performance

R Grol. JAMA 2001:284:2578-85


The university of michigan experience with the model for improvement

The University of Michigan experience with the model for improvement

  • Chronic disease management is a priority

  • Establish multi-specialty/department steering committee

  • Develop multi-payor chronic disease registries

    • Asthma, CAD, CHF and Diabetes

  • Collect relevant clinical information

  • Report information to provider & patient

    • Identify a responsible provider

  • Modify delivery system to improve care


Clinical information systems report to provider their patients data diabetes

Clinical Information SystemsReport to provider their patients data (diabetes)

  • Prioritize report and highlight items needing attention

  • Decide whether to usecoloror black & white ($$$)

  • Focus on information that can be easily obtained and that has clinical relevance


Educate providers and staff on improving clinical documentation

Educate providers and staff on improving clinical documentation

  • Click on:

  • Diabetes eye exam

  • Click on:

  • Foot exam – visual, sensory, pulses

  • Click on:

  • Self-management goal

  • Then enter the goal in

  • Additional information


Decision support1

Decision Support

  • Report detailed clinical data to the provider at patient's visit via an auto- mated system

  • Identify items that need attention; provide detailed action steps


Decision support identify registry patients for automated reminders

Decision Support Identify registry patients for automated reminders

  • Dear John Smith,

  • At the East Ann Arbor Health Center, we want you to have the best diabetes care. To improve our care and to keep our medical record up-to-date, we are sending this letter with information regarding diabetes-related tests and exams…. After reviewing your medical record, we have the following recommendations:

    •  Please take the enclosed slip to the lab for a:

      • blood test to check your average sugar control (A1c)

      • blood test to check your cholesterol levels

      • urine test to check your kidneys

  • You do not have to fast for this test. We will contact you about the results and suggest follow-up if needed.


Decision support reporting

Decision SupportReporting

  • Reports

    • Monthly high priority patient reports sent to nursing and pharmacists for case management

    • Semi-annual physician, health center comparative, and leadership reports

      • Discussed at health center and department leadership meetings to determine resource allocation, educational needs

      • Incorporated into physician annual performance evaluation


Umhs diabetes report by provider at one health center

UMHS Diabetes Report by Provider at one Health Center

Physician Name

%

  • - - - -

  • J. Smith

  • - - - -

  • - - - -

  • - - - -

  • - - - -

74

39

50

  • Be willing to show all their data to a provider

  • Do notsingle out an individual provider to other providers


Leadership report on asthma care patients age 18 years or younger

Primary care only

Pulmonary / allergy

Jointly managed

Leadership Report on Asthma Care Patients age 18 years or younger

< 18 years old

all patients


Delivery system design1

Delivery System Design


Delivery system design pdsa

Delivery System Design: PDSA

  • Use PDSA cycles at pilot sites to determine if an intervention is both feasible and effective

  • For example, improving hypertension control

    • Medical assistants at East Ann Arbor Health Center trained to add bright green sticker to patient encounter form if blood pressure > than target goal

    • Sticker prompts MD to note elevated BP and act

    • Sticker also prompts clerk to automatically schedule 2-4 week follow up with MD or pharmacist


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Delivery System Design

Patients with diabetes with blood pressure<135/80

UM average = 58%

Health Center


Delivery system design identify achievable benchmarks

Delivery System DesignIdentify Achievable Benchmarks

90%tile for BP < 130/80 across 25 academic teams participating in an Asso. American Medical CollegesChronic Care Collaborative is 56%

Population studied by each academic team


Activate patients

Activate Patients

  • Activate and educate patients by providing them with information on how they are doing at the time of their visit

  • Insert patient data onto a take-home educational sheet


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Self-management support

  • Handout is given to patient when put in the exam room

  • MA asks patient to think about a goal

  • MD supports goal

  • MA documents in medical record

  • MA calls patient in 2 weeks


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

Reinforce Self-management Goals


Self management goals documented

Self-management goals documented


University of michigan diabetes care improvements over time 2004 2007 n 9170

University of Michigan Diabetes Care Improvements over time, 2004 – 2007 (n=9170)


Spreading success

Spreading Success

  • Horizontal from pilot clinics to the remaining fourteen primary care health centers

    • 131 PCPs, 157 residents

    • Standardize practice at the health centers

  • Vertical from the primary care clinics to geriatric and endocrine specialty clinics

    • Involvement of the multi-specialty team members assist in implementation

  • Across conditions from diabetes to other chronic conditions with registries (asthma, CAD, CHF)


Meeting the needs of the community a system for redesigning care

For more information regarding the chronic care

model and its application, please see:

www.improvingchroniccare.org

or contact

Mike Hindmarsh……… [email protected]

Steven J. Bernstein….. [email protected]

Thank you


  • Login