1 / 7

Tail Bits in 1MHz SIG Field

Tail Bits in 1MHz SIG Field. Authors:. Date : 2012-07-16. The current spec-frame work document has the following SIG field allocation with Tail bits left TBD as the group wanted to explore tail-biting In this proposal we propose to use 6 tail bits in the 1MHz SIG just like the 2MHz SIG field

fayre
Download Presentation

Tail Bits in 1MHz SIG Field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tail Bits in 1MHz SIG Field Authors: Date: 2012-07-16 Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  2. Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  3. Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  4. The current spec-frame work document has the following SIG field allocation with Tail bits left TBD as the group wanted to explore tail-biting • In this proposal we propose to use 6 tail bits in the 1MHz SIG just like the 2MHz SIG field • Same as 11n and 11ac SIG fields Proposal Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  5. Does not make sense to have tail-biting just for the purposes of 1MHz SIG • 2MHz data, SIG and 1MHz data do not have tail-biting • The special processing does not seem worth it for just 1 symbol saving in the preamble Reason for having tail bits Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  6. Do you agree to have 6 tail bits in the 1MHz SIG field and make the following change to the spec framework document (delete the strike-through text below)? Straw-poll 1 Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

  7. Move to have 6 tail bits in the 1MHz SIG field and make the following change to the spec framework document (delete the strike-through text below)? Motion 1 Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm

More Related