1 / 30

HIV Testing and Considerations for Prevention

HIV Testing and Considerations for Prevention. Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Associate Director for Laboratory Diagnostics Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

fayre
Download Presentation

HIV Testing and Considerations for Prevention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HIV Testing andConsiderations for Prevention Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Associate Director for Laboratory Diagnostics Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  2. Percent of Persons Ever Tested and Tested in the Preceding 12 Months - NHIS 2002-2006 - MMWR August 8, 2008

  3. Early Indications of Progress:National Health Interview Survey Source: National Health Interview Survey

  4. Estimated Cases of HIV/AIDS, by year of diagnosis(based on 34 States with Confidential HIV Reporting) Source: HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2007

  5. CDC’s Expanded Testing Initiative Funded September 2007 • Test 1.5 million persons per year among populations disproportionately affected by HIV, primarily African-Americans. • Identify 20,000 new HIV infections

  6. Progress: Total Tests

  7. Total Tests HIV+ Tests Percentage of Tests and New HIV+ Testsby Venue, Sept 2007 through March 2009

  8. HIV Testing Among IDU • HIV Testing Survey, 1998-1999 • 90% previously tested • 5 cities, 1998 – 2002* • 93% previously tested • 69% tested within previous year *Chicago IL, Hartford CT, New Haven CT, Oakland CA, Springfield MA - Kellerman et el, JAIDS 2002 - Heimer et al, AJPH 2007

  9. HIV Testing Among MSM • Young MSM study, 1998-2000 • 88% previously tested, 54% in previous year • National HIV Behavioral Surveillance 2003-2005: • 92% previously tested, 77% in previous year • 57,131 MSM visits to STD clinics, Denver, DC, San Francisco, Seattle • 94% previously tested • Median inter-test interval 243 days - MacKellar et al, Sex Transm Diseases 2006 - CDC, MMWR Surveillance Summaries 2006 -Helms et al, JAIDS 2009

  10. HIV Prevalence and Proportion of Unrecognized HIV Infection Among 1,767 MSM, by Age Group and Race/Ethnicity NHBS, Baltimore, LA, Miami, NYC, San Francisco Age Group (yrs) 18-24 410 57 (14) 45 (79) 25-29 303 53 (17) 37 (70) 30-39 585 171 (29) 83 (49) 40-49 367 137 (37) 41 (30) ≥ 50 102 32 (31) 11 (34) Unrecognized HIV Infection No. % HIV Prevalence No. % Total Tested Race/Ethnicity White 616 127 (21) 23 (18) Black 444 206 (46) 139 (67) Hispanic 466 80 (17) 38 (48) Multiracial 86 16 (19) 8 (50) Other 139 18 (13) 9 (50) Total 1,767 450 (25) 217 (48) MMWR June 24, 2005

  11. Pooled RNA Screening for Acute HIV Infection

  12. CDC Acute HIV Infection Study 1-Stage Pooling 16 Specimens A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 1 Master Pool

  13. Yield from Pooled RNA Screening after EIA †Screened with Bio-Rad 1-2 Plus O *Screened with Vironostika EIA - Patel et al, CDC , Archives Int Med 2010

  14. Yield from Pooled RNA Screening after EIA †Screened with Bio-Rad 1-2 Plus O *Screened with Vironostika EIA - Patel et al, CDC , Archives Int Med 2010

  15. Yield from Pooled RNA Screening after Rapid Test - Patel et al, CDC , Archives Int Med 2010

  16. Yield from Pooled RNA Screening after Rapid Test *Screened with OraQuick †Screened with BioRad 1-2 Plus O - Patel et al, CDC , Archives Int Med 2010

  17. Acute HIV Screening: 99,111 tested - Patel et al, Archives Int Med 2010

  18. Acute HIV Screening: 99,111 tested - Patel et al, Archives Int Med 2010

  19. Acute HIV Screening: 99,111 tested - Patel et al, Archives Int Med 2010

  20. Acute Infections in MSM detected by NAAT • 0.3% of 14,005 frequently tested MSM in Seattle STD clinic; represent 20% of all HIV infections detected • 26 (74%) of 35 AHI cases detected in LA at MSM clinic; 25% of all HIV infections detected • 0.08% of 21,425 STD clinic patients in New York City; represent 9% of all HIV infections detected; 94% were MSM - Stekler et al, Clin Infect Dis 2009 - Patel et al, Archives Int Med 2010 - Shepard et al, MMWR 2009

  21. 4th Generation vs. RNA • RNA+/ 3rd gen-negative specimens detected by 4th generation EIA: • 38 of 46 (83%) – Australia* • 10 of 14 (71%) – CDC AHI study** • 51 of 61 (84%) – CDC panel*** • 4 days after RNA – 9 seroconversion panels*** * Cunningham P, HIV Diagnostics Conf 2007 ** Patel P, CROI 2009 *** Owen M, CROI 2009

  22. Potential Prevention Research Questions • Indications for and frequency of retesting • Role of acute infection in sustaining the epidemic • Community trial of structured serosorting intervention

More Related