1 / 11

Universal Coverage and Social Justice

Universal Coverage and Social Justice . Norman Daniels, HSPH PEH Conference on Universal Coverage April 19, 2013. Overview . Rationale for Universal Coverage Some Issues and Objections Reasonable disagreements about UC Bearing of conference on these points.

fathia
Download Presentation

Universal Coverage and Social Justice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Universal Coverage and Social Justice • Norman Daniels, HSPH • PEH Conference on Universal Coverage • April 19, 2013

  2. Overview • Rationale for Universal Coverage • Some Issues and Objections • Reasonable disagreements about UC • Bearing of conference on these points

  3. Fair Equality of Opportunity (FEO) and health (1) • Ill health diminishes exercisable opportunities • Health protection and health care help preserve exercisable opportunities • If there is social obligation to assure fair equality of opportunity, then have principle that can be extended to health/health care • justice and health (not just medical care)

  4. FEO andhealth (2) • Protecting range of exercisable opportunities--convergence with capabilities view • Risk reduction (population health) not simply medical care • Right to health/health care--special case of right to FEO (entitlements from fair deliberative process) • Financial protection as a way to protect fair share of opportunities (Brendan Saloner thesis 2012)

  5. FEO and UC • We cannot prevent all illness, so need UC even if get more health from other determinants • Financial protection is a form of opportunity protection • Fair financing--ability to pay (progressivity), well to ill • Sustainability important to equity, solidarity • Efficiency as ethical concern-- more needs covered • Reasonable disagreement about what to cover--need for fair deliberative process

  6. Objections (1) • We can improve population health and equity more by a fair distribution of social determinants of health than by assuring equal access to some medical care with UC • The visible failure to rescue those in ill health is not responded to psychologically or politically by statistical success in reducing the risk to population health

  7. Objections (2) • UC favors equality over helping the worst off-- it might ignore the impact of targetted vertical programs that better reach the worst off • UC does not imply uniform interventions and can accommodate use of vertical programs that may better reach targeted groups as part of a mix of services that improve universal access

  8. Objections (3) • UC misdirects resources toward medical care and away from more effective ways of improving population health • People who become ill are “identified” people who make significant, visible claims on others for assistance--this fact unavoidably affects the politics of resource allocation to health; when does what is politically feasible affect claims about what is justifiable as matter of justice?

  9. Objections (4) • A focus on financial protection distorts the health system away from a focus on health outcomes • Both financial protection and improvement of population health are goals of UC-- a properly designed system can achieve improvements in both, but the goals can pull apart

  10. Reasonable disagreement (RD) and fair process • RD is pervasive in design of UC • Medical Care vs Social Determinants • Access vs Financial Protection • Instances of unsolved rationing problems • best outcomes/fair chances; aggregation; priorities • Requires deliberative fair process to establish legitimacy and lead to arguably fairer decisions

  11. Human Rights and Social Justice • HR approach calls for governments to progressively realize right to health/health care • focuses attention on broad range of rights affecting health • priorities to be negotiated with governments in setting targets • fair deliberative process needed to supplement HR approach, as it is needed to supplement SJ

More Related