1 / 11

AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition

AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition. Presentation for DAU 9 August, 2006. Acquisition and Technology. Providing Value-Added Oversight and Coherent Strategic Direction for Reduced Cycle Time, Increased Competition and Predictable Performance Examples of Initiatives

farica
Download Presentation

AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition Presentation for DAU 9 August, 2006

  2. Acquisition and Technology Providing Value-Added Oversight and Coherent Strategic Direction for Reduced Cycle Time, Increased Competition and Predictable Performance Examples of Initiatives Concept Decision/Time Defined Acquisition Capital Budgeting Risk-Based Source Selection Defense Acquisition Executive Summary (DAES) IIPT/OIPT/DAB/Portfolio Management Processes Systems of Systems/Centers of Excellence Award/Incentive Fee Policy/FAR/DFAR Δ’s Acquisition of Services Policy Human Capital Strategic Planning Lead Systems Integrator/Spiral Acquisition Industry and Congressional Outreach “THE WILL TO CHANGE…”

  3. Concept Decision Toolkit MS C Stronger Emphasis Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Science and Technology Base • RISK-BASED SOURCE SELECTION • Reducing Risk and Improving Source Selection • CAPITAL ACCOUNTS • Program Funding Stability • TRI-CHAIR CONCEPT DECISION • Improved Process Alignment • Focused on Department Investment Decision Options • Time Defined determinations MS A MS B CD B’ FRP DR JCD EOA Rpt CDD CPD EOA Strategic Planning Guidance TechDev Joint Concepts O&S SDD FAA FNA PD CDR COCOM FCB OSD/JCS • TIME DEFINED ACQUISITION STRATEGY • Multiple Customer-Focused Paths to Speed Fielding of Capability • Post-Initiation Stability Initiatives CD Methodology—Broad Acquisition Initiatives

  4. Why do Concept Decision? Challenge: Maximize Process Change…Minimize Bureaucracy • Accelerate delivery of Joint warfighting capabilities • Current process slow to respond to warfighter needs • Address resource/funding constraints early • Necessary to control cost growth/requirements creep • Adequately fund and stabilize funding stream • Tailor analysis to support decision at hand • Not all programs require extensive, time consuming and costly additional analytical efforts • Leverage Service/organizational competencies • Delegate execution • Minimize oversight

  5. “As Is” Process MS A MS B MS C Production & Deployment Incremental Development • As Is: • Serialized • Program-Centric • Closed Aperture • Significant Early Service • Commitment of Resources Existing Focus Here Concept Decision Full Rate Prod DR JCD ICD CDD CPD System Development & Demonstration Strategic Planning Guidance AoA Joint Concepts Concept Refinement Technology Development FSA FAA FNA O&S FCB COCOM OSD/JCS Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Science and Technology Base

  6. MS B MS C Concept Decision MS A Production & Deployment Incremental Development Stronger Emphasis Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Science and Technology Base New “To Be” Process • To Be: • Aligned • Capability Orientation • Open Aperture • Joint • Broad Range of Options Future Focus Here Full Rate Prod DR JCD EoA Report CDD CPD System Development & Demonstration Strategic Planning Guidance EoA Joint Concepts Technology Development FAA FNA O&S FCB COCOM OSD/JCS

  7. Concept Decision:Notional Next Layer JCD sponsor drafts, PA&E approves, Tri-Chair directs CORPORATE TRI-CHAIR INVESTMENT DECISION CCJO, JOCs, JFCs and JICs A B C FCB, COCOM, Service–led Requirements FULL Technology Maturity CONOPS EoA Guidance Affordability CPD Concept Decision Tailored JCD 2 1 3 FNA Time-Defined Acquisition FAA CDD Initial Operational Capability EOA COCOM Service ICD PORTFOLIO Based: Investment Strategy Competitive Solutions Balance Risks Establish Baselines Rapid COCOM/Service/Agency FCB assesses, prioritizes gaps, shortfalls, and redundancies/offsets 0 < Years < 8 BOUNDED SOLUTIONS (I.E. 40 TO 80%)

  8. Concept DecisionFrom / To Savings

  9. Time-Defined Acquisition • A Customer-Focused Concept that: • Enhances system agility • Capitalizes on Rapid Acquisition Authority and the Concept Decision • Employs a time-sensitive acquisition approach emphasizing Customer Response and designed to provide capability when it is needed • Uses three risk-based criteria to determine the Acquisition Strategy: • Time to delivery • Requirement certainty • Technology maturity • Rapid requirements Triage via Gatekeeper function inherent in Concept Decision methodology • Enhanced by Enabling Actions: • Requirements Stability • B “Prime” CUSTOMER NEED Rapid Limited Full 6 mo – 2 yrs 2 – 4 yrs 4 – 8 yrs TIME-DEFINED ACQUISITION STRATEGY MILITARILY USEFUL CAPABILITY Our First Priority is to Produce Useful Capability for the Warfighter When Needed

  10. Requirements Stability—A Time-Defined Enabler IMPLIED AND DERIVED REQUIREMENTS UNDERSTOOD BASE KNOWLEDGEOF REQUIREMENT - Key System Attributes DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AWARD MS A MS B MS C CD FRP DR B’ JCD EOARpt CDD CPD Joint Concepts TechDev O&S SDD FAA FNA EOA PD SPG CDR RqmtsStabilized OSD/JCS COCOM FCB Proposed Requirements Stability Potential B “Prime” • No changes that may result in additions or extensions to baselined cost or schedule after CDR unless approved by the MDA and Requirements Approving Official • If such a change is approved by specified authority, it shall be self-financed and shall NOT impact schedule • Default policy should be to defer proposed changes to follow-on increment • A logical point, subsequent to Contract Award, where “Implied” and “Derived” requirements are known • At System CDR, or “B Prime,” that knowledge is available. There should be a required APB review at this point so we can assess the cost and schedule impact and identify non-value added cost drivers

  11. Funding Stability MS A MS B MS C CD FRP DR JCD EOARpt CDD CPD Joint Concepts TechDev O&S SDD FAA FNA EOA PD SPG Funding Stability OSD/JCS COCOM FCB • Capital Accounts • A financial initiative designed to provide stability in the budgeting system and to establish accountability for acquisition programs throughout the hierarchy of program responsibility • Implements a risk-informed investment strategy reflecting joint warfighter priorities • Consistent with the QDR and section 1004(a) of the FY 06 Authorization Act, the Department is exploring capital accounts to stabilize funding for selected major programs • Process will be part of the larger risk-informed investment strategy used to inform future investment decisions.

More Related