1 / 14

Plant response to bacterial TypeIII effectors

Plant response to bacterial TypeIII effectors . Lihua 12.3.08. Plant responses to pathogens. Susceptibility: host-pathogens. Resistance: non-host pathogens Basal defense: first line defense

fala
Download Presentation

Plant response to bacterial TypeIII effectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plant response to bacterial TypeIII effectors Lihua 12.3.08

  2. Plant responses to pathogens • Susceptibility: host-pathogens • Resistance: non-host pathogens • Basal defense: first line defense • PAMP-triggered immunity(PTI): common pathogen-associated moleculars (lipopolysaccharides, flagellin,elongation factor and peptidoglycans) • Hypersensive response(HR): Avirulence protein-R protein interaction • Effector-triggered immunity(ETI): Type III effetors (T3Es)

  3. Structural class of R proteins Kruijt M et al. Molecular plant pathology 2005,6( 1 ),85–97

  4. Avirulence and Virulence activity of effectors Block A et al. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2008, 11:396–403

  5. Indirect interaction of Avr-R Guard Hypothesis Host Targets R proteins Effectors Response to its action instead of Effector itself A R protein could response to two or more unrelated type III effectors targeting the same host machinery. A host protein complex that is a common target of various effctors might be guarded by more than one R protein.

  6. One Example Host Targets R proteins Effectors RIN4 Rpm1 AvrB AvrRpm1 Rps2 AvrRpt2 Induce HR Couples: AvrB/AvrRpm1-Rpm1 AvrRpt2-Rps2

  7. Key Experimental Test Yeast two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation data shows that: RIN4 directly interacts with AvrB, AvrRpm1 and RPM1 RIN4 is required for the HR induced by RPM1 Col-0: as positive control Rpm1/rps2: double mutant of two R proteins as negative control rin4-as : homozygous rin4 with normal morphology Mackey D et al. Cell 2002. 108: 743–754

  8. Key Experimental Test AvrRpm1 or AvrB Induces RPM1-indepentdent Phosphorylation of RIN4 Mackey D et al. Cell 2002. 108: 743–754

  9. Key Experimental Test AvrRpt2 induces disappearance of RIN4 What does the disappearance do to the interaction of AvrRpt2-RPS2? Mackey D et al. Cell 2003. 112: 379–389

  10. Key Experimental Test Elimination of RIN4 Activates RPS2: T-DNA insertion into the RIN4 gene is protein null and seedling lethal, whilerin4/rps2 double mutants survive Overexpression of RIN4 suppresses RPS2-induced HR Mackey D et al. Cell 2003. 112: 379–389

  11. Key Experimental Test AvrRpt2 is sufficient to induce degradation of RIN4 Protein mRNA avrRpm1-RIN4-Rpm1 avrRps2-RIN4-Rps2 AvrRpt2 could block the function of RPM1 By reducing RIN4 Mackey D et al. Cell 2003. 112: 379–389

  12. Conclusion RIN4 is required for the HR induced by both RPM1 and RPS2 AvrRpm1 or AvrB Induces RPM1-indepentdent Phosphorylation of RIN4, and RPM1 recognizes the phosphorylationto induce HR AvrRpt2 induces disappearance of RIN4, and RPS2 induce HR by the recognization of disappearance

  13. Weak point: 1. Need more convincing evidence from mass spectrometer about the phsophorylation of RIN4 since some other modification may exist; 2. Also need RIN4 in Col-0 treated with CIP as a control in following figure a a b 3.Need pattern of the expression level of RIN4 at different hours without inoculation of effectors in figure b.

  14. THANK YOU

More Related