1 / 14

Rhetoric and Interpretation

Rhetoric and Interpretation. Advanced Rhetorical Writing Matt Barton. The Value of Interpretation. Learning to interpret works of literature and art can help us interpret things like ads, speeches, and terrorism.

fadey
Download Presentation

Rhetoric and Interpretation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rhetoric and Interpretation Advanced Rhetorical Writing Matt Barton

  2. The Value of Interpretation • Learning to interpret works of literature and art can help us interpret things like ads, speeches, and terrorism. • Rhetoric can put “literary criticism” to work at understanding “everyday” things that matter to us.

  3. Rhetorical Interpretation • Rhetorically interpreting a poem requires a consideration of • the world it depicts • the world it reflects • the word its audiences reside in. • Rhetoricians consider the circumstances of an object’s creation and its reception over time…History matters.

  4. Genre & Literary Movements • Works that depart from tradition are really arguments for a new definition of art or literature. • Who gets to decide what is “art” and what is not?

  5. Effect of Art • “By reinforcing or challenging values and beliefs, symbolic acts can influence attitudes towards a variety of crucial matters.”

  6. Keatsian Imperative • “New Criticism” emphasizes “disinterested interest” in art and criticism. • Don’t read things “into” works; only read things “out” of them. • “Truth of a work” is found strictly in the work itself; context completely irrelevant. • Leads to a sort of civic detachment and selfishness. • Literature ought to be instead “equipment for living.”

  7. Interpreting Symbolic Acts • Stockhausen: 9/11 was “the greatest work of art imaginable for the whole cosmos.” • “The journalist in Hamburg completely ripped my statements out of a context, which he had not recorded in its entirety, to use it as a vile attack against my person and the Hamburg Music Festival.” --Stockhausen

  8. Terrorist Rhetoric • If military strikes are designed to maximize the destruction of enemy resources, terrorist attacks are designed to maximize news coverage. • Terrorists use our own media against us (we terrorize ourselves). • The terrorists of 9/11 didn’t get to control how others interpreted their act.

  9. PC • “Political Correctness” concerns an “ideological” vocabulary. • Substitutes euphemisms for traditional terms to avoid offending some people. • Police Officer vs. Policeman • “Learning Disability” vs. “Slow” • 40 BCE (Before Common Era) rather than 40 BC (Before Christ)

  10. Doublespeak • Doublespeak is “evasive language, language that gives every appearance of imparting information without actually doing so.” • “Rightsizing” vs. Laying People Off • “Strategic Withdrawal” vs. Retreating

  11. Neutral Language • Taking a stance against PC usually takes as a given that there’s a “neutral language” available. • Burke argues that “terminologies are lenses through which we see the world.” • These lenses (or “screens”) serve to express and shape our valuation of matters even if we don’t intend them to.

  12. Screens • “Pro-Choice” vs. “Pro-Abortion” • “Pro-Life” vs. “Anti-Choice” • “Estate Tax” vs. “Death Tax” • “Liberating Iraq” vs. “Occupying Iraq” • “Freedom Fighters” vs. “Terrorists” • “Sexual Orientation” vs. “Sexual Lifestyle”

  13. You’re Being Politically Correct • Challenging someone with being PC means doing the following: • Unmasking supposedly neutral terms and showing them to be persuasive claims • Setting up an opposition between a PC term and “what it really says” • Accusing the person of having “an agenda.”

  14. Debunking • It’s easy to fall into the trap of seeing everyone else as having an ideology. • We all engage in rhetoric and struggle with competing interpretations of the world, right and wrong, and identity.

More Related