1 / 45

Legal Issues

Legal Issues. Aims. Case MCA Decision Making Best interests Other MHA DoLs. Case Sarah. 40 year lady Lived carer / partner Moderate LD & epilepsy Complex mental health issues Psychosis Vulnerability. Case. Develops gangrenous R foot Admitted DGH Fluctuating consciousness

fabian
Download Presentation

Legal Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Legal Issues

  2. Aims • Case • MCA • Decision Making • Best interests • Other • MHA • DoLs

  3. Case Sarah • 40 year lady • Lived carer / partner • Moderate LD & epilepsy • Complex mental health issues • Psychosis • Vulnerability

  4. Case • Develops gangrenous R foot • Admitted DGH • Fluctuating consciousness • Partner asked to consent to amputation

  5. Discuss • ? Views • Who decides re capacity? • How should capacity be determined? • How are best interests decided? • Where could they seek advice?

  6. Legal concepts MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

  7. Statutory Principles • Presumed capacity. • Not be treated as incapacitous unless all practicable steps taken to improve decision making. • Right to make unwise decision. • Incapacity > treat best interests. • Least restrictive - persons rights & freedom of action.

  8. Aspects to consider • Timing /urgency of decision • Communication • Culture • Advocate • Carers

  9. 2 Stage Test • Impairment of mind / brain (temporary / permanent). • Impairment prevents a particular decision at the time it needs to be made.

  10. Ability to make decision • General understanding • relevant information of decision • why need to make it. • Consequences of proposed action & of not doing it. • Understand, retain, use & weigh. • Communicate.

  11. Capacity – particular decision • Understand (relevant information) • Retain, • Use & weigh. • Communicate.

  12. Incapacitous “For the purposes of this Act, a person lacks capacity in relation to a matter if at the material time he is unable to make a decision for himself in relation to the matter because of impairment in the functioning of, the mind or brain.” • Prove - balance of probability - lacks capacity. • Document process.

  13. Who decides • Final decision made by person intending to carry out action on behalf of someone - decision maker. • Complex decision ? Need further assessment involving another doctor/ expert. • Seek medical / legal advice decisions with significant impact or likely challenges.

  14. Practical steps • Understand nature & effect of decision • Other - staff / records • Family - not their view but what they think person would want confidentiality • Explain information at right level • Check understanding few minutes - rough explanation

  15. Professional / expert advice • Complicated / serious consequences. • Person challenges that decision. • Family disagree. • Conflict of interest between pt & assessor. • Someone might challenge. • Someone repeatedly makes decisions puts them at risk.

  16. Challenge finding • Ask assessor reasons & objective evidence • Assessor must show followed principles of Mental Capacity Act • Second opinion • If disagreement cant be resolved > Court of Protection - rule

  17. Best interests ‘ An act done, or decision made, under this act for or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be done, or made, in his best interests.’ Mental Capacity Act

  18. Best Interests Checklist • Person participate as much as possible. • Identify all relevant circumstances • Persons views - • Past / present • Beliefs & values • Other factors they would have considered if deciding for self • Avoid discrimination -age, appearance condition behaviour

  19. Best Interests Checklist… • ?regain capacity • Consult others - Confidentiality • Carers • Relatives • Attorneys • Court appointed deputy • IMCA • Least restrictive option • Weigh all

  20. Life sustaining decisions • Not be motivated by desire to bring about death • Not make assumptions on QoL • Reasonable steps to prolong life • Not obliged to if not in best interest of patient • Court of protection if dispute

  21. Exceptions • Advance decision • Research not covered here

  22. Capacity • Decision maker decides best interests • Lasting Power of attorney / court appointed deputy decide their scope of authority / • Make record of process • How decision reached • Who consulted • Particular factors • Reasons for reaching decision

  23. Disputes • Advocate • 2nd opinion • Best interest case conference • Mediation • Court of protection

  24. Advocacy • No close friends/ family • Family disagree • Doctors / family disagree • Conflict of interest • Use of restraint or restrictions • Protection of vulnerable adult

  25. Legal advice • Difficult / potentially problematic cases • Seek advice from • MPS / MDU • Trust legal advisors

  26. Legal Aspects MENTAL HEALTH ACT

  27. MHA • Use as for general psychiatry e.g. depressive disorder etc • LD • Arrested / incomplete development of mind • Significant impairment of intelligence + • Significant social functioning • Abnormally aggressive Behaviour or • Seriously irresponsible conduct

  28. LD - Act • State of arrested / incomplete development of mind which includes significant impairment of intelligence & social functioning • Present prior to adulthood • Not from accident / injury / illness after normal development.

  29. Significant impairment of IQ • on basis of reliable & careful assessment • Not defined by arbitrary cut off & • Significant social impairment

  30. Abnormally aggressive & irresponsible behaviour Application for detention for treatment / reception into guardianship on basis of LD without other mental disorder only be made associated with 1 or both of.. • Abnormally aggressive behaviour • Seriously irresponsible conduct Not defined Depend on nature of B & circumstances

  31. Ax conduct abnormally aggressive Not defined Depend on nature of B & circumstances Risks safety for individual & others How persistent & severe it been ?trigger ?out of proportion Whether & to what degree > harm / distress to others / damage to property ? Likely to reoccur ? How common to popn generally

  32. Ax seriously irresponsible conduct • ? B suggest disregard /inadequate regard for its serious / dangerous consequences • ? How recent ? Persistence • ? Harm to others • If not recent how likely to reoccur

  33. Legal aspects DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS (DOLS)

  34. Background • Bournewood case • HL • Autistic & profound LD • Unable to consent to admission • Admitted treated • Restricted contact with carers • Kept sedated • Continuous supervision • Would be assessed for detention if tried to leave

  35. ECHR • HL deprived of liberty Article 5 (1) of European convention of human rights • Detention arbitrary not in accordance with law • No procedure for him to challenge detention. Non compliant with Article 5(4) of

  36. DoLS • Safeguard for “Bournewood gap” • Difference between restriction upon liberty or deprivation of liberty one of degree or intensity

  37. Factors to consider re restraint / deprivation • Restraint including sedation to admit person who is resisting admission • Complete effective control care & movement significant periods • Decided not to release into care of others or permitted to live elsewhere • Refused request by carers for person to be discharged • Unable to maintain social contacts • Loses autonomy as under continuous supervision

  38. Authorizing • Court of protection • DoLS • Necessary in order to give life - sustaining treatment while decision sought from court

  39. Supervisory body PCT or Local authority authorize DoL adult in hospital / care home respectively • Needs • Representative • Regular review • Can request review any time

  40. Lack capacity • Best interests • Less restrictive alternative

  41. 6 requirements • Age - >18 • Mental health must be suffering with mental disorder or LD ( section 12 approved or special experience in diagnosis & assessment of mental disorder • Mental capacity – anyone mental health assessor / best interests assessor • Best interest. Best interest checklist consult others – IMCA if no one

  42. Best interest. Best interest checklist • consult others – IMCA if no one • Amhp /SW/ 1st level nurse/ OT/ psychologist – trainig • Eligibility – ineligible if under MHA • No refusals

  43. References • Mental Health Act Manual. Richard Jones eleventh edition • Assessment of Mental capacity a practical guide for doctors & lawyers 3rd edition. BMA & law society • Code of Practice – Mental Capacity Act 2005. TSO

More Related