1 / 39

Search for the Higgs bosons in supersymmetric extensions of the SM

Search for the Higgs bosons in supersymmetric extensions of the SM. Giorgos Dedes Seminar : Physik am Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Outlook. ATLAS - CMS SUSY – MSSM Higgs sector Higgs masses Production and Decay Benchmark scenarios Higgs searches Summary. ATLAS.

ezra
Download Presentation

Search for the Higgs bosons in supersymmetric extensions of the SM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Search for the Higgs bosons in supersymmetric extensions of the SM Giorgos Dedes Seminar : Physik am Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

  2. Outlook • ATLAS - CMS • SUSY – MSSM Higgs sector • Higgs masses • Production and Decay • Benchmark scenarios • Higgs searches • Summary

  3. ATLAS • Inner Detector:Highly segmentedsilicon strips, determine very accurately charged particles trajectories • Solenoid Magnet: Solenoid coil that generates a 2T magnetic field in the region of the Inner Detector • Electromagnetic Calorimeter: Electron and photon energies are measured through electromagnetic showers • Hadronic Calorimeter: Hadrons interact with dense material and produce a shower of charged particles • Toroid Magnets: 8 toroidal coils that create a 0,4T magnetic field in the area of the Muon Spectrometer • Muon Spectrometer:Muons traverse the rest of the detector and are measured in its outer layers

  4. CMS • Tracker:Cocentric layers ofsilicon sensors, measure charged particles trajectories • Electromagnetic Calorimeter: Lead-Tungstate crystals, electrons – positrons – photons interact there and their energy is measured • Hadronic Calorimeter: Hadrons interact brass layers and produce a shower of charged particles • Solenoid Magnet: Largest solenoid ever built, creates 4T field that bends the charged particle trajectories • Return Yoke:Magnetic field created from the solenoid is returned in the iron yoke. Offers support structure for the detector • Muon Chambers:Located in the iron yoke, measure energy of muons

  5. SuperSymmetry (motivation from Higgs sector) • Hierarchy problem in the SM Higgs sector: Quantum corrections to the H mass have quadratic divergencies • By introducing supersymmetric partners for the SM particles • quadratic divergencies are cancelled

  6. SuperSymmetry • By introducing superparticles, the SM particle spectrum is doubled.

  7. MSSM (in a nutshell) • MSSM is the minimal extension to the standard model that realizes supersymmetry. • It imposes an extra symmetry, R parity • Sparticles enter interactions in pairs, with particles having R parity of 1 and sparticles of -1 • Sparticles are produced and annihilated in pairs

  8. 3 are absorbed from the H mechanism and give masses to W± and Z 5 physical Higgs bosons 8 degrees of freedom MSSM Higgs sector • In order to implement electroweak symmetry breaking into the MSSM, two Higgs doublets (H1, H2) that couple to up and down type particles, are needed. • 2 CP even (h, H),1 CP odd (A) and 2 charged H± • The MSSM Higgs sector (at tree level) is determined by 2 free parameters MAand tanβ=v2/v1(ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the 2 Higgs doublets) • In CP conserving scenarios mass eigenstates are equal to CP eigenstates. In CP violating scenarios additional free parameters appear. Non vanishing phases mix the CP eigenstates to 3 mass eigenstates

  9. Higgs masses • At tree level: andfor This gives us an upper limit for the h mass • Modifications to tree level due to top loops give additional contributions to Mh So Mh < 133 GeV • For the decoupling limit MA>>MZ A and H have similar couplings and are degenerate in mass while h resembles standard model Higgs

  10. Higgs production (neutral) • d • Main production mechanisms: gluon fusion and associated production with b-quarks which is dominant at high values of tanβ • Vector boson fusion and Higgs-strahlung are suppressed for h/H/A (suppressed coupling to W±, Z) • With respect to the SM, cross sections are enhanced with rising tanβ

  11. Higgs production (charged) • Three main production processes in LHC, for single H± • From tt via gg fusion • In association with top and b quarks • In association with t quark

  12. Higgs decays • For large tanβ, the dominant decay channels for h/H/A are bb and ττ • H± branching ratios are divided to 2 regions: dominant decay to τν for MH± <Mt and decay to tb for MH± >Mt

  13. Benchmark scenarios • Due to the large number of free parameters, the MSSM Higgs search is performed in 4 CP conserving (CPC) and 1 CP violating (CPV) scenarios • CPC scenarios: • mh – max scenario (MSUSY = 1TeV, μ=200GeV, M2=200GeV, Xt=√6MSUSY, Ab=At, Mgluino=0,8MSUSY) • no - mixing scenario (MSUSY = 2TeV, μ=200GeV, M2=200GeV, Xt=0, Ab=At, Mgluino=0,8MSUSY) • gluophobic scenario (MSUSY = 350GeV, μ=300GeV, M2=300GeV, Xt=-750GeV, Ab=At, Mgluino=500GeV) • small α scenario (MSUSY = 800GeV, μ=2TeV, M2=500GeV, Xt=-1100GeV, Ab=At, Mgluino=500GeV) • CPV scenario: the CPX scenario (MSUSY = 500GeV, μ=2TeV, M2=200GeV, Ab=At, Mgluino=1000GeV)

  14. Benchmark scenarios • mh-max scenario:Designed to maximize the h mass. Gives a limit for the Mh (133 GeV) that strongly depends on Mt • no-mixing scenario:Similar to mh-max but with no mixing in the stop sector. Designed to explore the effect of no stop mixing, results to Mh < 116 GeV (Difficult for LHC) • gluophobic scenario:Coupling of h to gluons strongly suppressed. Designed to affect the processes gg→h , h→γγ and h→ZZ →4l. Yields a Mh < 119 GeV • small α scenario:Coupling of h to b and τ is suppressed. Mh < 123 GeV. Designed to affect the channels h→ττ and tth, h→bb • CPX scenario: CP eigenstates do not coincide with mass eigenstates. So h, A, H mix to mass eigenstates H1, H2, H3. CPX has maximal mixing (90 degrees) Suppressed h-gluon coupling

  15. Status of previous Higgs searches • The search for MSSM H bosons has been performed at LEP and is an ongoing effort at Tevatron • LEP: 8 scenarios scanned at LEP1 and LEP2 No discovery but limits for the masses and tanβ have been set. tanβ exclusion 0,7 – 2.0 and Mh , MA > 90 GeV • Tevatron: Still no discovery, a large part of the tanβ - MA parameter space will be covered with 5 fb-1 of data (2007-2008)

  16. Higgs searches in LHC • ATLAS and CMS will cover a large variety of different final states and a big part of the (MA, tanβ) plane • The channels investigated during the last years in ATLAS and CMS are: h/H/A→γγ h/H/A→bb h/H/A→ττ h/H/A→μμ H→ZZ , tt , hh A→Zh H±→τν , tb H/A→χo2χo2

  17. h / H / A → γγ • The expected MSSM rates for h and H decaying to γγ are generally suppressed with respect to SM case. For this rare decay, A boson is only observable in a limited region of the parameter space. • Optimistic scenario: Branching ratio is estimated assuming that all SUSY particles have a mass higher than 1TeV (there can be stop-quarks , charginos and neutralinos lighter than 1TeV) • The same kinematic cuts are applied as in the case of the SM 2 photon candidates ordered in PT (starting from PT1 > 40GeV and PT2 > 25GeV for h and reaching PT1 > 125GeV and PT2 > 25GeV for the heavy Higgses • Both photon candidates in |n|<2,4 and events with more than one γ in transition region in an interval Δn = 0,15 are rejected • Backgrounds: γγpair production, γ-jet, dijet and Z→ee ATLAS

  18. h / H / A → bb ATLAS • More promising channel is h / H / A → bb , due to the high branching ratio (~90%) especially for high values of tanβ • For the low mass Higgs best sensitivity is achieved in the tth, h→bb • For high mass region bbH/A, H/A→bb • Quite challenging to trigger a 4 jet final state • Require 2 hard jets from Higgs decay and 2 softer tagging jets • Enormous QCD background • Complex final state, 20% combinatoric background ATLAS

  19. h / H / A → bb • In more recent study performed for the CMS detector, this channel is considered as cross check after discovery in H / A → ττ CMS • At least 4 jets are required within the detector acceptance |n|<2,4 with the hardest 2 passing PT thresholds dependant on the Higgs mass • Additional selection in CMS analysis the centrality variable • Discovery possible for tanβ>30 (largely dependant on background uncertainties) CMS

  20. h / H / A → ττ • For h main production mechanism is VBF while for H/A associated production with b-jets • All τ decay modes have been considered (lepton-lepton / lepton – hadron / hadron - hadron) • Due to the escaping neutrinos mass reconstructions is done by using the collinear approximation ATLAS • Mass resolution dependant on Δφ between the visible decay products and sensitive to ETmiss resolution

  21. h / H / A → ττ • Is considered a discovery channel for heavy neutral Higgs, especially in mass range 150 – 300 GeV

  22. h / H / A → μμ ATLAS • Same coupling as for ττ channel, but BR scales as (mμ/mτ)2 ≈ 1/300 • For high tanβ, associated production with b-jets is dominant • Clean signature in the detector • Excellent mass resolution, can provide the best mass and width measurement for H/A

  23. H→ZZ(*) →4l , H→tt • h/H→ZZ(*): Not thoroughly searched, extrapolated results from SM For high tanβ suppressed HZZ coupling, rise of hh tt If observed identified from the low rate ATLAS MH=370GeV tanβ=1,5 • H→tt: Suppressed coupling with gauge bosons, tt becomes interesting Observed as peak over the continuous tt background Mass reconstruction from the decay channel bWbW→blνbj

  24. H→hh , A→Zh • Would allow simultaneous observation of 2 Higgs bosons • For H→hh, possible decays are: bbbb (largest rate-difficult trigger), bbττ(can trigger on leptonic tau), bbγγ(easy to trigger – low rate) • For A→Zh with final state: μμbb or eebb , require 2 leptons with Z mass constrain and 2 bjets well separated from the leptons Signal Zbb tt Z+jets

  25. H±→ τν / tb • 2 prominent decay modes, τν / tb for MH lower/higher than tb production threshold • MH < Mt : tt→H±Wbb→(τν)(lν)bb→(hνν)(lν)bb , trigger from W leptonic decay • MH > Mt : gg→tbH± →(bW)b(τν)→(bjj)b(hνν) , disentangle τ-jet from light jets t mass constraint tb decay channel opens gg→tbH± →tb(tb)→WWbbbb→qqμνbbbb gb→tH± →t(tb)→WWbbb→qqμνbbb has large tt+jets background , multivariate techniques used CMS , 30fb-1 3-tags

  26. A/H →χo2χo2 • MSSM Higgs can be also searched in decays to supersymmetric particles • Can give us a handle on the low and intermediate tanβ region not accessible by A/H→ττ • Promising decay into the next to lightest neutralinos , χo2→l+l-χo1 • Main backgrounds: squarks and gluinos cascade decays , ZZ(*), Zbb • Apply lepton isolation , jet andZ veto • No mass peak reconstruction, excess of events

  27. Overall discovery potential • In LHCMSSM Higgs could be discovered within the first years (30 fb-1) • At 300 fb-1, the biggest part of the parameter space will have been scaned • A challenge for both theorists and experimentals : A region where only one Higgs can be seen, is it SM or MSSM ?

  28. Conclusions • Supersymmetry and MSSM in particular are favorite candidates for extension of the SM • Searches for the MSSM Higgs have been started at LEP, continue at Tevatron and will start soon in LHC experiments • A large number of processes provide us the capability to scan a large area of the parameter space • Tevatron could surprise us, otherwise LHC can give as indications during the first 3 years and discovery afterwards

  29. Backup slides

  30. Production cs at low tanb

  31. A BR also in SUSY particles

  32. MSSM Higgs sector

  33. h/H/A couplings

  34. CPV mixing

  35. SM – MSSM discrimination

  36. Other contributions in cs

  37. h discovery potential • ….dependence on scenarios…

  38. CPV discovery potential

More Related