1 / 22

Denmark and Aalborg University

Community power conference Toronto 2011 Frede Hvelplund Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University hvelplund@plan.aau.dk. Denmark and Aalborg University. www.energyplanning.aau.dk hvelplund@plan.aau.dk. Goals of the new Government.

ezra
Download Presentation

Denmark and Aalborg University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Community power conferenceToronto 2011Frede Hvelplund Department of Development and PlanningAalborg Universityhvelplund@plan.aau.dk

  2. Denmark and Aalborg University www.energyplanning.aau.dk hvelplund@plan.aau.dk

  3. Goals of the new Government • 40% reduction in CO2 emission compared to 1990. • From 22% (2011) to 50% windpower in 2020 • 50% reduction in heat use per m2 before 2050 • 100% Renewable Energy in 2050 (whenpeopleborntodayare 38 years old). For energyplanning2050 is now!

  4. The Energy Planning Research Group Department of Development and planning http://www.en.plan.aau.dk/ Energiplanlægning

  5. 30 Years of active Energy Planning 30 years of active Government and Parliament Energy Policies. Including NGO alternative strategies and public debate

  6. I.Research activities

  7. 1. Energy systems analyzis Goal 100% renewableenergy 1. How to establishand co-ordinaterenewableenergy and energyconservation systems. (economicgains by designingsupply systems to energyefficientconsumption) 2. How to integrate 50% and later 100% intermittentenergy (windenergy)

  8. System 1. Electricity Balance and Grid Stability (1990) Non Active Components Active Components Demand Centralised CHP and Power Plants RES (Renewable Energy Sources) DG (Distributed Generation)

  9. System 2:Activating DG CHP-units (2000--) Non Active Components Active Components CentralisedCHP and Power Plants Demand DG (Distributed Generation) RES (Renewable Energy Sources)

  10. System 3: CHP-units and Heat Pumps (2010--) Non Active Components Active Components Centralised CHP and Power Plants Demand DG (Distributed Generation) Heat Pumps RES (Renewable Energy Sources)

  11. System 4Activating RE via increased power consumption for heat pumps and transportation. (2020--) In-active components Active components Central power- and CHP plants Local actors Consumption Decentral CHPs Heat-pumps RE Wind Power for transportation etc. www.planogmiljo.dk

  12. 2.Institutional analysis • What hampers and supportsthe development and implementation of Renewable Energy and energy conservation? • Which type of policies should be implemented in order to assure the introduction af Renewable Energy and Energy conservation

  13. Fossil fuel based: Concrete institutional economy Technical scenarios/present marketconditions • Goals of society • Climate • Energy indepe • Economy • Democracy • Employment • Innovation • Etc. I. ”Direct”market policy (CO2 quotas, Carbon trade etc.) • Changing Institutional market design • Tax structure • -tarif structure • Schools/Universities • Technological Institutions. • Corporate ownership. • Etc. II.”Indirect” market policy ”Certificate trading”, corporateownership, etc. P a r l i a m e n t - M u n i c i p a l i t i e s • Old ”energy market dependent” lobbyists • Large oil-/coal- uranium mining companies • Large power companies. • Etc.

  14. Concreteinstitutionaleconomy/Innovative democracy Technical scenarios/present marketconditions • Goals of society • Climate • Energy indepe • Economy • Democracy • Employment • Innovation • Etc. I. ”Direct”market policy (CO2 quotas, Carbon trade etc.) • Changing Institutional market design • Tax structure • Schools/Universities • Technological Institutions. • Democratic participation. • Etc. II.”Indirect” market policy ”Certificate trading”, corporateownership, etc. P a r l i a m e n t - M u n i c i p a l i t i e s • Old ”energy market dependent” lobbyists • Large oil-/coal- uranium mining companies • Large power companies. • Etc. • Energy marketindependent lobbyists • Energy NGOs • Public debate

  15. Concreteinstitutionaleconomy/Innovative democracy Technical scenarios/existing marketdesign. • Goals of society • Climate gas reduction • Energy independen ce • Innovation • Democracy • Etc. I. ”Direct”market policy (CO2 quotas, Carbon trade etc.) • Institutional market design • Tax structure • Tarif structure • Technological Institutions. • Democratic participation. • - Community ownership • Etc. II. ”Indirect”market policy ”Feed in”, co-operative, municipal, ownerhip etc. III. Reforming political processes P a r l i a m e n t - M u n i c i p a l i t i e s • Old ”energy market dependent” lLobbyists • Large oil-/coal- uranium mining companies • Large power companies. • Etc. New ”energy market dependent” lobbyists -wind-,solar-,wave energy producers -Energy conservation producers • Energy marketindependent lobbyists • Energy NGOs • Public debate

  16. II. Education activitiesSustainable Energy Planning and Management(Master Study in English)

  17. Master in Sustainable Energy, Policy and Management (SEPM) Shouldlearnpracticaluse of interdiciplinaritybetween social science and technical science. Through: • RenewableEnergy Systems analysis b. Analyses of the links betweentechnologicaldevelopment and the institutional, economic and politicalconditions.

  18. Outline of the programme

  19. Study model 1.Group work on first and second semester (50% group work and 50% lectures/exercises) 2. Often individual 3th sem. and 4th sem.(master project). 3. Pedagogical model is project organized PROBLEM BASED LEARNING. Students decides their project theme.

  20. Example of 1. sem. projects

  21. 2, 3 and 4.sem.project examples • Policies for house insulation in Kaunas, Lithuania. (m) • Policies for betteruse of biomass in Poland.(m) • Policies for 100% Renewable Energy on a Greek Island.(m) • Policies for Renewable Energy in Soutafrica.(3) • Policy for sustainableenergy plan for Latvia.(2) • A strategy for Renewable Energy in the US.(m) • A district heating plan and policy for New York.(2) • Analysis of CDM projects in Thailand.(3) All theseprojects have technical scenarios plus institutionalanalysis and policy formulation.

  22. Thanks!

More Related