1 / 49

Tracking Efficiency of higgs to bb

Tracking Efficiency of higgs to bb. Pooja Saxena CDRST Delhi University, INDIA. Outline. Definitions & selection cut Results at 3TeV center of mass energy. e + e - -> bb~nunu ~ e + e - -> bb~. Definitions & Selection cut. Tracking Efficiency:

ezhno
Download Presentation

Tracking Efficiency of higgs to bb

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tracking Efficiency of higgs to bb Pooja Saxena CDRST Delhi University, INDIA

  2. Outline • Definitions & selection cut • Results at 3TeV center of mass energy • e+e- -> bb~nunu~ • e+e- -> bb~

  3. Definitions & Selection cut Tracking Efficiency: = reconstructed MC particles / MC particles where, - reconstructed MC particle: tracks which could match with the MC particles. - MC particles: All findable MC particle from the generated level. Common cuts • Theta cut: 10 < θ< 170 (deg) • Pt cut: pt > 1GeV • |Origin- vertex point| < 50 mm • Charge: Different from 0 • Flight distance cut: path length> 10 mm

  4. Tracking EfficiencyResults: e+e- -> bb~vv~ at 3 TeV~9k events 95.9%

  5. Efficiency plots (All MC particles) 98% 94% 100% • Efficiency ~98% in the central region, and falls to ~ 94% in the very forward region. • Efficiency drops with increase in Pt • For hits ≥ 8, efficiency is ~100 % (except for hit=19)

  6. Efficiency plots:(stable MC particles) 99% 99% 98% Transition from barrel to disk 100% 98.7% • Stable at the generator level

  7. Efficiency plots:(backscattered) 90% 80% 80% 80% • Backscattered are in the pt range of 1-10 GeV

  8. Efficiency plots:(unstable MC particles) 80% 60% 95% 66% • Efficiency ~80% in the central region, and falls to ~ 60% in the vary forward region. • Efficiency very low for low pt (1-5 GeV) particles &further drops with increase in Pt • For hits ≥ 8, efficiency is ~100 % (except hit=18)

  9. Pt distribution: ee -> bbuu Stable all mc Unstable Backscattered

  10. No of Hits(All MC) • hits ≥ 6 99.5% 99.7% 96.2% • hits < 6 3.7% no of hits < 6 MC is reconstructed too but less efficiently

  11. Non reco MC (4.1 % fraction of all MC) 40cm 6 • 0.5% fraction of all MC with high path length(>40cm) & high pt(>1GeV) could not be reconstructed. • Out of 0.5%, 18% lies in central region whereas 81.9% in forward region. • Majority of them were high pt π & few K, p, e, µ & D. 6 • Majority of High Pt particles giving low hits are the B, D mesons which decays sooner or later in the tracker

  12. MC (hits>14) [19% fraction of all MC] • Central region • Forward Region • 19% fraction of all MC particles are lying in hits>14 (22014 MC particles) • Out of 19%, ~99.9% lies in forward region & ~0.07% in central region • In central region, they all are low pt, low pz e-. • Trying to resolve, why high pt, high pz particles giving hits>14.

  13. Stable non RECO MC (1% of all MC) 40cm 6 • 1.0 % of all MC particles are stable non reco • ~30 % of the non reco MC are the stable non reco particles. • π+- , k, p are the unreconstructed stable particles • Stable at the Generator level

  14. Stable non RECO MC 1% of all MC π+- p K • 1.0 % of all MC particles are stable non reco • ~30 % of the non reco MC. • π+- , k, p are the unreconstructed stable particles

  15. B Meson (6.8% fraction of all MC ) Pt >1 GeV Pt >1 GeV Pt distribution theta distribution Pt >1 GeV Pt >1 GeV Pt distribution (Path length >10 mm) • All (7832) were produced from the IP with high pt(>1GeV). • Out of 6.8%, ~ 0.8% (834) lies in the beam pipe whereas rest 99.2 % (6998) in theta region of 10<θ <170 degree. • In theta acceptance, 30 % goes to central region & rest 70% to forward region.

  16. Summary • For ee->bbuu at 3 TeV COM energy, track reconstruction efficiency is found to be 95.9% on all MC level & 98.7% at the stable MC level. • MC particles having high pt & high pz giving hits>14 is still to look for.

  17. Tracking EfficiencyResults: e+e-->γ*/Z -> bb~ at 3 TeV~9k events 96%

  18. Efficiency plots 98% 94% ?

  19. Efficiency plots:MC status = 0 (backscattered) 80% 80% 77.4%

  20. Efficiency plots:MC status = 1 (stable MC) 98% 99% 98% 98.6%

  21. Efficiency plots:MC status = 2 (unstable MC) 80% 66.5% 70.7%

  22. Pt distribution: ee -> bb Stable all mc Unstable Backscattered

  23. No of Hits(All MC) • hits ≥ 6 99.5% 99.5% 96.7% • hits < 6 3.4% no of hits < 6 MC is reconstructed too but less efficiently

  24. Non reco MC (3.8 % fraction of all MC) 6 40cm • 0.6% fraction of all MC with high path length(>40cm) & high pt(>1GeV) could not be reconstructed. • Out of 0.6%, 14% lies in central region whereas 86% in forward region. • Majority of High Pt particles giving low hits are the B, D mesons which decays sooner or later in the tracker

  25. MC (hits>14) [20% fraction of all MC] Central region Forward Region • 20% fraction of all MC particles are lying in hits>14 (22014 MC particles) • Out of 20%, ~99.9% lies in forward region & ~0.07% in central region • In central region, all are low pt low pz e-

  26. Summary • For ee->bbuu at 3 TeV COM energy, track reconstruction efficiency is found to be 95.9% on all MC level & 98.7% at the stable MC level. • For ee->bb at 3 TeV COM energy, track reconstruction efficiency is 96% on all MC level & 98.6% at the stable MC level. • MC particles having high pt & high pz giving hits>14 is still to look for.

  27. BACK UP SLIDES

  28. CLIC SiD Tracker

  29. Pt distribution: ee -> bbuu Status=0 all mc Status=2 Status=1

  30. Pt distribution: ee -> bb Status=0 all mc Status=2 Status=1

  31. ee- -> Zh->hhvv samples

  32. MC (10<hits<20) p π+- K, D • 46% fraction of all MC particles are lying in 10<hits<20 (#52994) • 99% lies in forward region & 1% in central region

  33. Non Reco Status=1 mc particles Lakdfjkd Dfa Dfdf Dfa 20% Central region-> Lakdfjkd Dfa Dfdf Dfa (of status=1 non reco particles)

  34. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV: forward region 80% 55% • Efficiency falls from 80% from forward to 55 from vary forward region.

  35. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV central region 90% 85% Low statistics for high pt

  36. Efficiency plots (pt < 200GeV) 98% 94% 100%

  37. Efficiency plots:MC status = 0 (backscattered )pt> 200 GeV

  38. Efficiency plots:MC status = 1 (stable )pt > 200 GeV

  39. Efficiency plots:MC status = 2 (unstable )pt > 200 GeV

  40. Tracking EfficiencyResults: e+e-->γ -> bb at 3 TeV~9k events

  41. Efficiency plots:MC status = 0 (backscattered )pt< 200 GeV

  42. Efficiency plots:MC status = 1 (stable ) pt< 200 GeV

  43. Efficiency plots:MC status = 2 (unstable ) pt< 200 GeV

  44. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV central region • pt< 200 GeV

  45. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV forward region • pt< 200 GeV

  46. For MC pt< 200 GeV

  47. Ee-> bb~

  48. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV forward region

  49. Efficiency plots pt>20GeV central region

More Related