Loading in 5 sec....

Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal StreamsPowerPoint Presentation

Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal Streams

Download Presentation

Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal Streams

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- 125 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal Streams

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Testing the Equivalence Principle for Dark Matter Using Tidal Streams

Michael Kesden, CITA

Collaborator: Marc Kamionkowski, Caltech

COSMO ‘06

Tahoe City, CA

Thursday, September 28, 2006

- Galactic rotation curves, large-scale structure (LSS), galaxy clusters all indicate ΩDM 0.25
- Extensions to the Standard Model offer many possible WIMPs (axions, neutralinos, etc.)
- Detection of non-gravitational interactions could help identify DM. What interactions might be observable?

- Perhaps DM interacts with DE
- Log(/mPl4) -120 « 1
- ~ m … Why now?
- Maybe acceleration due to scalar field, just like inflation. Scalar field should couple generically.

- String theory includes “dilatons”, light, neutral scalar fields that might interact with DM (Damour et al. 1990, Gubser & Peebles, 2004)

- Long-range DM force interpreted as violation of the equivalence principle (EP), the universality of free fall between stars and DM
- Laboratory tests place tight limits on fifth force in visible sector (Su et al., 1994); no such limits for DM
- Modeled by Lint = g V = -g2/4r exp{-mr} (Frieman & Gradwohl, 1991)
- Force suppressed by a factor 2 g2mPl2/4m2 compared to gravity; how might we detect such a force?

- LSS
- Attractive DM force enhances structure for (r < m-1) (Gradwohl & Frieman, 1992)
- 5th force leads to scale-independent bias (Amendola & Tocchini-Valentini, 2002)

- CMB
- Models where coupled DE traces DM constrained by WMAP (Amendola & Quercellini, 2003)

- Clusters
- Baryons preferentially lost during mergers

- Is there new test with different systematics, greater sensitivity?

- Galaxies form hierarchically; dwarf galaxies in Local Group continue to merge with Milky Way
- Smaller galaxies tidally disrupted by larger hosts at distances R where:
rsat > rtid ~ R(msat/2MR)1/3

- Tidal disruption establishes energy scales:
- Esat» Etid» Ebin disrupted stars retain similar orbits to satellite; trail/lead with gain/loss in energy

- Non-uniformity of Galactic gradient leads to natural asymmetry:

- DM force displaces stars from bottom of satellite’s potential well, a new DM-induced asymmetry

- DM asymmetry exceeds natural asymmetry when:

- Sgr dwarf is closest satellite at 24 kpc
- Stellar stream observed by 2MASS using M-giants with known age, color-magnitude relation
- Surface densities, radial velocities, distances well-measured for
leading: -100º < < -30º

trailing: 25º < < 90º

(Law, Johnston, & Majewski, 2005)

- Stellar densities also measured by SDSS (Belokurov et al., 2006)

- N-body simulation of satellite galaxy with:
- M = 5 108 M, M/L = 40 M/L
- Pericenter = 14 kpc, Apocenter = 59 kpc

- Initial conditions generated by GALACTICS (Widrow & Dubinski, 2005)
- Simulations evolved using GADGET-2 (Springel, 2005)

- Attractive force suppresses leading-to-trailing ratio
CurveColor

Standardblack

Satellite Massmagenta

Satellite Spinred

Circular Orbittop blue

Planar orbitbottom blue

Heavy diskcyan

Two profilesgreen

Lower M/Lyellow

- We don’t know what the DM is. Theory suggests we consider the possibility of a long-range “fifth force”.
- Tidally disrupting galaxies ideal test; core DM-dominated but not streams
- Attractive DM-force sweeps core ahead. Disrupted stars preferentially gain energy; LTR suppressed.
- Tidal streams are a messy probe of new physics, but the signature of a DM force is very distinctive, model-independent.
- The Sgr tidal stream is well observed; new tidal streams have been discovered in last few months in SDSS. Future surveys like SIM or Gaia will find even more.
- Like dropping stars and DM off Leaning Tower of Pisa!