Operational Integration Team Complex Procedure Presentation Alaska October 2-4, 2002 Dave Peterson

1. Operational Integration Team Complex Procedure Presentation Alaska October 2-4, 2002 Dave Peterson

2. Satellite Navigation’s Mission WAAS/LAAS Implementation

3. Objective • FAA Satellite Navigation Mission • Overview of Operational Integration Program • Status of Operational Integration Projects

4. Current WAAS PerformanceAvailable Via FAA GPS Website http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/vpl.html

5. Potential LAAS Benefits • Achieve Consistent, Accurate, Repeatable Performance • Expand Closely Spaced Parallel Runway Ops • Support Advanced/Complex Procedures Which Provide Improvements in Safety and Capacity to Lower Minima • Support Surface Movement Applications • Eliminate Need for In-Aircraft Procedure Database • Support Extended Arrival Procedures • Support RNP Based Operations

6. Potential LAAS Benefits • Reduce Aircraft Separation Requirements • Reduce ATC Workload • Reduce Obstacle Clearance Requirements • Ability to Change or Create Approach Procedures without Infrastructure Changes • Ability to Implement Multiple, Segmented, or Variable Glide Slopes • Support Runway Incursion Avoidance Systems • Compress the Density of Terminal Operations

7. Potential LAAS Benefits • Support Adjacent Airport Operations • De-conflict Airspace • Enable Environmental and Security Improvements (e.g., Noise Abatement) • Support Highly Reliable 4-D Guidance in Terminal Area • Ability to Use Single LAAS System to Support Approaches at Multiple Runway Ends • Improved ATC Terminal Area Surveillance Through Improved Navigation Accuracies

8. Operational Integration

10. Operational Evolution of SatNav Procedures LAAS CAT II/III Advanced Procedures LAAS CAT I CAPABILITY WAAS GLS WAAS LPV Approaches WAAS LNAV/VNAV Approaches Stand-Alone GPS Approaches GPS Overlays 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 TIME

11. WAAS Policy and Guidance

12. LAAS Policy and Guidance CAT I CAT II/III Flt Stds Guidance TERPS Air Traffic Control NOTAMS Certification Flight Inspection Procedure Production Complete Now In Progress, Complete by 7/03 In Progress, NOT Complete by 7/03 Not Started

13. LAAS Avionics • LAAS Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) DO-253A and Interface Control Document (ICD) DO-246B, Updated 11/28/01 • Technical Standard Orders (TSOs) for Navigation Sensor and VHF Data Broadcast Being Prepared for Public Comment • Software Mod to Add WAAS GEO Ranging to LAAS MMR Navigation Solution Delivered, 3/29/02 • Modifications to Add Curved Approach Processing Being Initiated at FAATC

14. Flight Standards

15. Approach Strategy • Evolve from Angular Criteria (Today) to Optimized Criteria (Angular/Linear) • Industry Desires Linear Criteria • Phase 1 • Benefit Establishes a Foundation for All • Commonality of RNP Across NAS • Phase 2 • Benefit Comes With RNP <0.3 • RNP Based Missed Approach Guidance • Leverage CAST, But Do Not Disrupt • Both Currently Funded Under CAST • Still Need SAAR Procedures • Up to 2000 Additional Procedures - Subject to Benefits Analysis • Specials Continue

16. Strategy Initial Implementation Next Steps • Public RNP 0.3 • Qualifying aircraft: GPS or RNP-certified using DME/DME/Inertial • TERPS: 2xRNP primary, 1xRNP transitional • Implement on RNAV approaches, replace LNAV/VNAV • Specials Public SAAR Lower RNP Public SOIA Approach • RNP 2 • Qualifying aircraft: Tailor RNAV criteria (GPS, DME) • TERPS: Using Level 2 RNAV DPs, RNAV STARS • Implement as part of national airspace redesign RNP 1 Terminal Arrivals & Departures • RNP 2 • Qualifying aircraft: Tailor RNAV criteria (GPS, DME) • TERPS: 8 mi. aircraft separation (centerline) • Implement wherever advantageous and equipage exists • Supports existing route structures. - RNP 1 - Optimize structure - Procedural separation - Mandates? En Route

17. En Route RNAV Projects 6 - West Coast Routes $455 Thousand 104 - ACA Routes $4.1 Million 56 - ASA Routes $2 Million 37 - Multi-Center Routes $2.6 Million “Q” Routes Provide RNAV Routing for Gulf of Mexico Savings $21.6 Million Total Annual Airline Reported Savings = $30.8 Million

18. Procedures and Surveys

19. Procedure Production Schedule Available Via FAA GPS Website • Available at http://avn.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=nfpo/production • Also, available at http://gps.faa.gov/CapHill/index.htm

20. Interference Detection and Risk Mitigation

21. GPS Interference Detection and Location

22. Air Traffic

23. Overview • LAAS Program Commissioning 6 LRIP Systems • Memphis, Phoenix, Houston, Seattle, Chicago, Juneau • One of the Fundamental Benefits Users Expect from LAAS is Ability to Fly Complex Procedures • Purpose of this Meeting is to Establish a Plan for Implementing Complex Procedures at the 6 LRIP Airports

24. Background • AND-720 has been Meeting with LAAS Users, Air Traffic Representatives, and Procedure Developers to • Better Define Anticipated LAAS Benefits • Understand Desired LAAS Operations • Establish What the OIT Can and Can Not Do to Implement Those Operations • Goal is to Develop Consensus on Projects to Implement Desired LAAS Operations

25. Background • Kick-off Meeting Held in Arlington, VA (April) • Second Meeting Memphis, TN (April) • Third Meeting Chicago, IL (July) • Fourth Meeting Chicago, IL (August) • Develop Requirements for Specific LAAS Procedures at Chicago • Additional Meetings being Considered for each LAAS LRIP Airport

26. Site Coordinators • Each Site has a Primary and Backup Coordinator • Facilitate the Development of the Advanced Procedures • Assist AND-720 Establish a Development Team for Each LRIP Airport • Coordinate with the Airports and Regions (Following Site Visits by AND-710 and AND-720) • Coordinate Development Team Meetings and Activities • Refine Detailed Schedules for Each Site, Track Progress and Ensure Schedules are Being Met • Identify Issues

27. LRIP Coordinators • Memphis • Bob Beal • Campbell Motley • Seattle • Rich Cole • Paul Wagoner • Phoenix • Tim Roe • Paul Ewing • Chicago • Jeff Cochrane • Larry Oliver • Juneau • Bob Beal • Campbell Motley • Houston • Tracey Golden • Tim Roe

28. Top Level Complex Procedure Development Schedule

29. Follow-On Activities • Develop a Chicago Specific Project Plan • Initial Focus on Guided Descending Approach to 09L • Incrementally Addressing Entire Procedure – Reduced Separation, Missed Approach, Guidance • Task Leads • Review Task Details • Ensure All Sub-Tasks Addressed • Ensure Schedule is Realistic • Submit Project Plans and Resource Requirements to Cover FY03 Tasks • Schedule Site Visits (AND-710, 720) and Coordinator Coordination

30. Triple Convergence Approach – Chicago O’Hare Double click executable to play file

31. Guided Complex Approach to 09L

32. Schedule Level 1_1

33. Schedule Level 1_2

34. Schedule Level 1_3

35. Schedule Level 1_4