1 / 53

On Solutions of the one-dimensional Holstein Model Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer

Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian 116029 China. Louisiana State Univ. Baton Rouge 70803 USA. On Solutions of the one-dimensional Holstein Model Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer. 23rd International Conference on DGM in Theoretical Physics, Aug. 20-26,05 Tianjin. Contents. I. Introduction

evelia
Download Presentation

On Solutions of the one-dimensional Holstein Model Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian 116029 China Louisiana State Univ. Baton Rouge 70803 USA On Solutions of the one-dimensional Holstein Model Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer 23rd International Conference on DGM in Theoretical Physics, Aug. 20-26,05 Tianjin

  2. Contents I. Introduction II. Brief Review of What we have done III. Algebraic solutions the one-dimensional Holstein Model IV. Summary

  3. Introduction: Research Trends 1) Large Scale Computation (NP problems) Specialized computers (hardware & software), quantum computer? 2) Search for New Symmetries Relationship to critical phenomena, a longtime signature of significant physical phenomena. 3)Quest for Exact Solutions To reveal non-perturbative and non-linear phenomena in understanding QPT as well as entanglement in finite (mesoscopic) quantum many-body systems.

  4. Bethe ansatz Critical phenomena Quantum Many-body systems Exact diagonalization Quantum Phase transitions Group Methods Methods used

  5. Goals: 1) Excitation energies; wave-functions; spectra; correlation functions; fractional occupation probabilities; etc. 2) Quantum phase transitions, critical behaviors in mesoscopic systems, such as nuclei. 3) (a) Spin chains;(b) Hubbard models, (c) Cavity QED systems, (d) Bose-Einstein Condensates, (e) t-J models for high Tc superconductors; (f) Holstein models.

  6. All these model calculations are non-perturbative and highly non-linear. In such cases, Approximation approaches fail to provide useful information. Thus, exact treatment is in demand.

  7. II. Brief Review of What we have done (1) Exact solutions of the generalized pairing (1998) (2) Exact solutions of the U(5)-O(6) transition (1998) (3) Exact solutions of the SO(5) T=1 pairing (2002) (4) Exact solutions of the extended pairing (2004) (5) Quantum critical behavior of two coupled BEC (2005) (6) QPT in interacting boson systems (2005) (7) An extended Dicke model (2005)

  8. Origin of the Pairing interaction Seniority scheme for atoms (Racah) (Phys. Rev. 62 (1942) 438) BCS theory for superconductors (Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1175) Applied BCS theory to nuclei (Balyaev) (Mat. Fys. Medd. 31(1959) 11 Constant pairing / exact solution (Richardson) (Phys. Lett. 3 (1963) 277; ibid 5 (1963) 82; Nucl. Phys. 52 (1964) 221)

  9. General Pairing Problem

  10. Some Special Cases constantpairing separable strength pairing cij=A ij+ Ae-B(i-i-1)2ij+1 + Ae-B(i-i+1)2ij-1 nearestlevel pairing

  11. Exact solution for Constant Pairing Interaction [1] Richardson R W 1963 Phys. Lett.5 82 [2] Feng Pan and Draayer J P 1999 Ann. Phys. (NY) 271 120

  12. Next Breakthrough?Solvable mean-field plus extended pairing model

  13. Different pair-hopping structures in the constant pairing and the extended pairing models

  14. Exact solution Bethe Ansatz Wavefunction: w M k

  15. Eigen-energy: Bethe Ansatz Equation:

  16. 1=1.179 2=2.650 3=3.162 4=4.588 5=5.006 6=6.969 7=7.262 8=8.687 9=9.899 10=10.20 Energies as functions of G for k=5 with p=10 levels

  17. Higher Order Terms

  18. Ratios: R = <V> / < Vtotal>

  19. Even-Odd Mass Differences Odd A Theory Experiment “Figure 3” Even A P(A) =E(A)+E(A-2)- 2E(A-1) for 154-171Yb

  20. 6

  21. Nearest Level Pairing Interaction for deformed nuclei In the nearest level pairing interaction model: cij=Gij=A ij+ Ae-B(i-i-1)2ij+1 + Ae-B(i-i+1)2ij-1 [9] Feng Pan and J. P. Draayer, J. Phys. A33 (2000) 9095 [10] Y. Y. Chen, Feng Pan, G. S. Stoitcheva, and J. P. Draayer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B16 (2002) 2071 Nilsson s.p.

  22. Nearest Level Pairing Hamiltonian can be written as which is equivalent to the hard-core Bose-Hubbard model in condensed matter physics

  23. Eigenstates for k-pair excitation can be expressed as The excitation energy is 2n dimensional n

  24. 232-239U 227-233Th Binding Energies in MeV 238-243Pu

  25. 232-238U 227-232Th First and second 0+ excited energy levels in MeV 238-243Pu

  26. 230-233Th 238-243Pu odd-even mass differences in MeV 234-239U

  27. 226-232Th 230-238U 236-242Pu Moment of Inertia Calculated in the NLPM

  28. III. Algebraic solutions the one-dimensional Holstein Model Models of interacting electrons with phonons have been attracting much attention as they are helpful in understanding superconductivity in many aspects, such as in fullerenes, bismuth oxides, and the high-Tc superconductors. Many theoretical treatments assume the adiabatic limit and treat the phonons in a mean-field approximation. However, it has been argued that in many CDW materials the quantum lattice fluctuations are important. [1]A. S. Alexandrov and N. Mott, Polarons and Bipolarons (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995). [2] R. H. McKenzie, C.J. Hamer and D.W. Murray, PRB 53, 9676 (96). [3] R. H. McKenzie and J. W. Wilkins, PRL 69, 1085 (92).

  29. The model Here we present a study of the one- dimensional Holstein model of spinless fermions with an algebraic approach. The Hamiltonian is (1)

  30. Analogue

  31. (3) (4) (5)

  32. Solutions Let us introduce the differential realization for the boson operators with (7) For i=1,2,…,p. Then, the Hamiltonian (1) is mapped into (8)

  33. According to the diagonalization procedure used to solve the eigenvalue problem (2), the one-fermion excitation states can be assumed to be the following ansatz form: (9) Where |0> is the fermion vacuum and

  34. By using the expressions (8) and (9), the energy eigen-equation becomes (11)

  35. which results in the following set of the extended Bethe ansatz equations: for ¹ = 1,2, …, p , which is a set of coupled rank-1 Partial Differential Equations (PDE’s), which completely determine the eigenenergies E and the coefficients . Though we still don’t know whether the above PDE’s are exactly solvable or not, we can show there are a large set of quasi-exactly solutions in polynomial forms. The results will be reported elsewhere.

  36. Once the above PDEs are solved for one-fermion excitation, according to the procedure used for solving the hard-core Fermi-Hubbard model, the k-fermion excitation wavefunction can be orgainzed into the following from: (13) with (14)

  37. The corresponding k-fermion excitation energy is given by (15)

  38. In summary (1) General solutions of the 1-dim Holstein model is derived based on an algebraic approach similar to that used in solving 1-dim hard-core Fermi-Hubbard model. (2) A set of the extended Bethe ansatz equations are coupled rank-1 Partial Differential Equations (PDE’s), which completely determine the eigenenergies and the corresponding wavefunctions of the model. (3) Though we still don’t know whether the PDE’s are exactly solvable or not, at least, these PDE’s should be quasi-exactly solvable.

  39. Thank You !

  40. Phys. Lett. B422(1998)1

  41. Phys. Lett. B422(1998)1 SU(2) type

  42. Nucl. Phys. A636 (1998)156

  43. SU(1,1) type Nucl. Phys. A636 (1998)156

  44. Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 044134

  45. Sp(4) Gaudin algebra with complicated Bethe ansatz Equations to determine the roots. Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 044134

  46. Phys. Lett. A339(2005)403

  47. Bose-Hubbard model Phys. Lett. A339(2005)403

More Related