Distributed structural health monitoring a cyber physical system approach
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 25

Distributed Structural Health Monitoring A Cyber-Physical System Approach PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 117 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Distributed Structural Health Monitoring A Cyber-Physical System Approach. Chenyang Lu Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Outline. Distributed Structural Health Monitoring ART: Adaptive Robust Topology Control. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM).

Download Presentation

Distributed Structural Health Monitoring A Cyber-Physical System Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Distributed structural health monitoring a cyber physical system approach

Distributed Structural Health MonitoringA Cyber-Physical System Approach

Chenyang Lu

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Outline

Outline

  • Distributed Structural Health Monitoring

  • ART: Adaptive Robust Topology Control


Structural health monitoring shm

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)

  • “More than 26%, or one in four, of the nation's bridges are either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.” [ASCE 2009]

  • Detect and localize damages to structures

  • Wireless sensor networks can monitor at high temporal and spatial granularities

  • Key Challenges

    • Computationally intensive

    • Resource and energy constraints

    • Long-term monitoring


Existing approaches

Existing Approaches

  • Centralized approach: stream raw sensor data to base station for processing.

  • Example: Golden Gate Bridge monitoring project [UCB]

    • Nearly 1 day to collect enough data for one computation

    • Lifetime of 10 weeks w/4 x 6V lantern battery

  • Observations

    • Too much sensor data to stream to the base station

    • Damage detection is too complex to run entirely on sensors

    • Separate designs of SHM algorithm and sensor networks


Our approach

Our Approach

  • Distributed Architecture

    • Performs part of computation on sensor nodes

    • Send partial (smaller) results to base station

    • Base station completes computation

  • Cyber-Physical Co-design

    • Select an SHM algorithm that can be partitioned into components

    • Optimal partition of the SHM algorithm between sensor nodes and base station

Raw Data

Partial

Results


Damage localization algorithm damage localization assurance criterion dlac

Damage Localization AlgorithmDamage Localization Assurance Criterion (DLAC)

  • Use vibration data to identify structure’s natural frequencies.

  • Match natural frequencies with models of healthy and damaged structures to localize damage.

  • Important: partition between sensors and the base station.

    • Minimize energy consumption

    • Subject to resource constraints

Raw Data

Partial

Results


Data flow analysis

D Integers

(1) FFT

D: # of samples

P: # of natural freq.

(D » P)

D Floats

(3a) Coefficient Extraction

(2) Power Spectrum

5*P

Floats

D/2 Floats

(3) Curve Fitting

(3b) Equation Solving

P Floats

Healthy Model

Damaged Location

(4) DLAC

Data Flow Analysis

DLAC Algorithm


Data flow analysis1

4096 bytes

(1) FFT

D: 2048

P: 5

Integer: 2 bytes

Float: 4 bytes

8192 bytes

(3a) Coefficient Extraction

(2) Power Spectrum

Effective compression ratio of 204:1

100

bytes

4096 bytes

(3) Curve Fitting

(3b) Equation Solving

20 bytes

Healthy Model

Damaged Location

(4) DLAC

Data Flow Analysis

DLAC Algorithm


Evaluation truss

Evaluation: Truss

  • 5.6 m steel truss structure at UIUC

    • 14 0.4m-long bays, sitting on four rigid supports

  • 11 Imote2s attached to frontal pane

Damage correctly localized to third bay


Energy consumption

Energy Consumption

Evaluation


Energy consumption1

Energy Consumption

Evaluation


Summary

Summary

  • Cyber-physical co-design of a distributed SHM system

    • Reduces energy consumption by 71%

    • Implemented on iMote2 platform using <1% of memory

  • Effectively localized damage on two physical structures

G. Hackmann, F. Sun, N. Castaneda, C. Lu, and S. Dyke, A Holistic Approach to Decentralized Structural Damage Localization Using Wireless Sensor Networks, RTSS 2008.


Outline1

Outline

  • Distributed Structural Health Monitoring

  • ART: Adaptive Robust Topology Control


Topology control

Topology Control

  • Goal: reduce transmission power while maintaining satisfactory link quality

  • But it’s challenging:

    • Links have irregular and probabilistic properties

    • Link quality can vary significantly over time

    • Human activity and multi-path effects in indoor environments

  • Most existing solutions are based on ideal assumptions

  • Contributions:

    • Insights from empirical study in an office building

    • ART: robust topology control designed based on insights


Advantages of topology control

-15 dBm

-25 dBm

0 dBm

Advantages of Topology Control

Testbed Topology


Is per link topology control beneficial

... but have modest performance @ -5 dBm

Insight 1: Transmission power should be set on a per-link basis to improve link quality and save energy.

3 of 4 links fail @ -10 dBm ...

Is Per-Link Topology Control Beneficial?

Impact of TX power on PRR


What is the impact of transmission power on contention

Low signal strength

High

contention

Insight 2:Robust topology control algorithms must avoid increasing contention under heavy network load.

What is the Impact of Transmission Power on Contention?


Is dynamic power adaptation necessary

Is Dynamic Power Adaptation Necessary?

Link 110 -> 139


Can link stability be predicted

Insight 3: Robust topology control algorithms must adapt their transmission power in order to maintain good link quality and save energy.

Can Link Stability Be Predicted?

Long-Term Link Stability


Are link indicators robust indoors

Are Link Indicators Robust Indoors?

  • Two instantaneous metrics are often proposed as indicators of link reliability:

    • Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI)

    • Link Quality Indicator (LQI)

  • Can you pick an RSSI or LQI threshold that predicts whether a link has high PRR or not?


Are link indicators robust indoors1

RSSI threshold = -85 dBm, PRR threshold = 0.9

4% false positive rate

62% false negative rate

RSSI threshold = -84 dBm, PRR threshold = 0.9

66% false positive rate

6% false negative rate

Insight 4: Instantaneous LQI and RSSI are not robust estimators of link quality in all environments.

Are Link Indicators Robust Indoors?

Links 106 -> 129 &104 -> 105


Summary of insights

Summary of Insights

  • Set transmission power on a per-link basis

  • Avoid increasing contention under heavy network load

  • Adapt transmission power online

  • LQI and RSSI are not robust estimators of link quality


Art adaptive and robust topology control

ARTAdaptive and Robust Topology control

Designed based on insights from empirical study

  • Adjusts each link’s power individually

  • Detects and avoids contention at the sender

  • Tracks link qualities in a sliding window, adjusting transmission power at per-packet granularity

  • Does not rely on LQI or RSSI as link quality estimators

  • Is simple and lightweight by design

    • 392B of RAM, 1582B of ROM, often zero network overhead

G. Hackmann, O. Chipara, and C. Lu, Robust Topology Control for Indoor Wireless Sensor Networks, SenSys 2008.


Acknowledgement

Acknowledgement

  • Computer Science: Greg Hackmann,Fei Sun, Octav Chipara

  • Structural Engineering: Nestor Castaneda, Shirley Dyke


For more information

For More Information

  • http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~lu/

  • Structural Monitoring: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~lu/shm/

  • ART: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~lu/upma.html


  • Login