- 139 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Clustering High Dimensional Data Using SVM' - evangeline-shepard

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Clustering High Dimensional Data Using SVM

Tsau Young Lin and Tam Ngo

Department of Computer Science

San José State University

Overview

- Introduction
- Support Vector Machine (SVM)
- What is SVM
- How SVM Works
- Data Preparation Using SVD
- Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
- Analysis of SVD
- The Project
- Conceptual Exploration
- Result Analysis
- Conclusion
- Future Work

Introduction

- World Wide Web
- No. 1 place for information
- contains billions of documents
- impossible to classify by humans
- Project’s Goals
- Cluster documents
- Reduce documents size
- Get reasonable results when compared to humans classification

Support Vector Machine (SVM)

- a supervised learning machine
- outperforms many popular methods for text classification
- used for bioinformatics, signature/hand writing recognition, image and text classification, pattern recognition, and e-mail spam categorization

Convex Hulls

Source: Bennett, K. P., & Campbell, C., 2000

Simple SVM Example

- How would SVM separates these points?
- use the kernel trick
- Φ(X1) = (X1, X12)
- It becomes 2-deminsional

Source: Author’s Research

SVM Calculation

- Positive: w x + b = +1
- Negative: w x + b = -1
- Hyperplane: w x + b = 0
- find the unknowns, w and b
- Expending the equations:
- w1x1 + w2x2 + b = +1
- w1x1 + w2x2 + b = -1
- w1x1 + w2x2 + b = 0

Use Linear Algebra to Solve w and b

- w1x1 + w2x2 + b = +1
- w10 + w20 + b = +1
- w13 + w29 + b = +1
- w1x1 + w2x2 + b = -1
- w11 + w21 + b = -1
- w12 + w24 + b = -1
- Solution is w1 = -3, w2 = 1, b = 1
- SVM algorithm can find the solution that returns a hyperplane with the largest margin

Use Solutions to Draw the Planes

Positive Plane:

w x + b = +1

w1x1 + w2x2 + b = +1

-3x1 + 1x2 + 1 = +1

x2 = 3x1

Negative Plane:

w x + b = -1

w1x1 + w2x2 + b = -1

-3x1 + 1x2 + 1 = -1

x2 = -2 + 3x1

Hyperplane:

w x + b = 0

w1x1 + w2x2 + b = 0

-3x1 + 1x2 + 1 = 0

x2 = -1 + 3x1

Source: Author’s Research

Simple Data Separated by a Hyperplane

Source: Author’s Research

LIBSVM and Parameter C

- LIBSVM: A Java Library for SVM
- C is very small: SVM only considers about maximizing the margin and the points can be on the wrong side of the plane.
- C value is very large: SVM will want very small slack penalties to make sure that all data points in each group are separated correctly.

Choosing Parameter C

Source: LIBSVM

4 Basic Kernel Types

- LIBSVM has implemented 4 basic kernel types: linear, polynomial, radial basis function, and sigmoid
- 0 -- linear: u\'*v
- 1 -- polynomial: (gamma*u\'*v + coef0)^degree
- 2 -- radial basis function: exp(-gamma*|u-v|^2)
- 3 -- sigmoid: tanh(gamma*u\'*v + coef0)
- We use radial basis function with large parameter C for this project.

Data Preparation Using SVD

- SVM is excellent for text classification, but requires labeled documents to use for training
- Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
- separates a matrix into three parts; left eigenvectors, singular values, and right eigenvectors
- decompose data such as images and text.
- reduce data size
- We will use SVD to cluster

SVD Example of 4 Documents

- D1: Shipment of gold damaged in a fire
- D2: Delivery of silver arrived in a silver truck
- D3: Shipment of gold arrived in a truck
- D4: Gold Silver Truck

Source: Garcia, E., 2006

Matrix A = U*S*VT

Given a matrix A, we can factor it into three parts: U, S,and VT.

Source: Garcia, E., 2006

U =

0.3966 -0.1282 -0.2349 0.0941

0.2860 0.1507 -0.0700 0.5212

0.1106 -0.2790 -0.1649 -0.4271

0.1523 0.2650 -0.2984 -0.0565

0.1106 -0.2790 -0.1649 -0.4271

0.3012 -0.2918 0.6468 -0.2252

0.3966 -0.1282 -0.2349 0.0941

0.3966 -0.1282 -0.2349 0.0941

0.2443 -0.3932 0.0635 0.1507

0.3615 0.6315 -0.0134 -0.4890

0.3428 0.2522 0.5134 0.1453

S =

4.2055 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 2.4155 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 1.4021 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2302

Using JAMA to Decompose Matrix ASource: JAMA (MathWorks and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST))

V =

0.4652 -0.6738 -0.2312 -0.5254

0.6406 0.6401 -0.4184 -0.0696

0.5622 -0.2760 0.3202 0.7108

0.2391 0.2450 0.8179 -0.4624

VT =

0.4652 0.6406 0.5622 0.2391

-0.6738 0.6401 -0.2760 0.2450

-0.2312 -0.4184 0.3202 0.8179

-0.5254 -0.0696 0.7108 -0.4624

Using JAMA to Decompose Matrix A- Matrix A can be reconstructed by multiplying matrices: U*S*VT

Source: JAMA

U’ =

0.3966 -0.1282

0.2860 0.1507

0.1106 -0.2790

0.1523 0.2650

0.1106 -0.2790

0.3012 -0.2918

0.3966 -0.1282

0.3966 -0.1282

0.2443 -0.3932

0.3615 0.6315

0.3428 0.2522

S’ =

4.2055 0.0000

0.0000 2.4155

Rank 2 Approximation (Reduced U, S, and V Matrices)- V’ =

0.4652 -0.6738

0.6406 0.6401

0.5622 -0.2760

0.2391 0.2450

Use Matrix V to Calculate Cosine Similarities

- calculate cosine similarities for each document.
- sim(D’, D’)=(D’• D’) /(|D’| |D’|)
- example, Calculate for D1’:
- sim(D1’, D2’) = (D1’• D2’) / (|D1’| |D2’|)
- sim(D1’, D3’)=(D1’• D3’) / (|D1’| |D3’|)
- sim(D1’, D4’) = (D1’• D4’) / (|D1’| |D4’|)

Result for Cosine Similarities

- Example result for D1’:

sim(D1’, D2’)= ((0.4652 * 0.6406) + (-0.6738 * 0.6401)) = -0.1797

( (0.4652)2 + (-0.6738)2 ) * ( (0.6406)2 + (0.6401) 2 )

sim(D1’, D3’)= ((0.4652 * 0.5622) + (-0.6738 * -0.2760)) = 0.8727

( (0.4652)2 + (-0.6738)2 ) * ( (0.5622)2 + (-0.2760)2 )

sim(D1’, D4’)= ((0.4652 * 0.2391) + (-0.6738 * 0.2450)) = -0.1921

( (0.4652)2 + (-0.6738)2 ) * ( (0.2391)2 + (0.2450)2 )

- D3 returns the highest value, pair D1 with D3
- Do the same for D2, D3, and D4.

D1: 3

D2: 4

D3: 1

D4: 2

label 1: 1 3

label 2: 2 4

Result of Simple Data Set- label 1:
- D1: Shipment of gold damaged in a fire
- D3: Shipment of gold arrived in a truck
- label 2:
- D2: Delivery of silver arrived in a silver truck
- D4: Gold Silver Truck

Check Cluster Using SVM

- Now we have the label, we can use it to train with SVM
- SVM input format on original data:

1 1:1.00 2:0.00 3:1.00 4:0.00 5:1.00 6:1.00 7:1.00 8:1.00 9:1.00 10:0.00 11:0.00

2 1:1.00 2:1.00 3:0.00 4:1.00 5:0.00 6:0.00 7:1.00 8:1.00 9:0.00 10:2.00 11:1.00

1 1:1.00 2:1.00 3:0.00 4:0.00 5:0.00 6:1.00 7:1.00 8:1.00 9:1.00 10:0.00 11:1.00

2 1:0.00 2:0.00 3:0.00 4:0.00 5:0.00 6:1.00 7:0.00 8:0.00 9:0.00 10:1.00 11:1.00

Results from SVM’s Prediction

Results from SVM’s Prediction on Original Data

Source: Author’s Research

Using Truncated V Matrix

- We want to reduce data size, more practical to use truncated V matrix
- SVM input format (truncated V matrix):

1 1:0.4652 2:-0.6738

2 1:0.6406 2:0.6401

1 1:0.5622 2:-0.2760

2 1:0.2391 2:0.2450

SVM Result From Truncated V Matrix

Results from SVM’s Prediction on Reduced Data

Using truncated V matrix gives better results.

Source: Author’s Research

Analysis of the Rank Approximation

Cluster Results from Different Ranking Approximation

Source: Author’s Research

use the previous methods on larger data sets

compare the results with that of humans classification

Program Process Flow

Program Process FlowConceptual Exploration

- Reuters-21578
- a collection of newswire articles that have been human-classified by Carnegie Group, Inc. and Reuters, Ltd
- most widely used data set for text categorization

Result Analysis

Clustering with SVD vs. Humans Classification First Data Set

Source: Author’s Research

Result Analysis

Clustering with SVD vs. Humans Classification Second Data Set

Source: Author’s Research

Result Analysis

- highest percentage accuracy for SVD clustering is 81.5%
- lower rank value seems to give better results
- SVM predicts about the same accuracy as SVD cluster

Result Analysis: Why results may not be higher?

- humans classification is more subjective than a program
- reducing many small clusters to only 2 clusters by computing the average may decrease the accuracy

Conclusion

- Showed how SVM works
- Explore the strength of SVM
- Showed how SVD can be used for clustering
- Analyzed simple and complex data
- the method seems to cluster data reasonably
- Our method is able to:
- reduce data size (by using truncated V matrix)
- cluster data reasonably
- classify new data efficiently (based on SVM)
- By combining known methods, we created a form of unsupervised SVM

Future Work

- extend SVD to very large data set that can only be stored in secondary storage
- looking for more efficient kernels of SVM

References

Bennett, K. P., & Campbell, C. (2000). Support Vector Machines: Hype or

Hellelujah?. ACM SIGKDD Explorations. VOl. 2, No. 2, 1-13

Chang, C & Lin, C. (2006). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines,

Retrived November 29, 2006, from http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm

Cristianini, N. (2001). Support Vector and Kernel Machines. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://www.support-vector.net/icml-tutorial.pdf

Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to Support Vector

Machines. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press

Garcia, E. (2006). SVD and LSI Tutorial 4: Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) How-to Calculations. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from

http://www.miislita.com/information-retrieval-tutorial/svd-lsi-tutorial-4-lsi-how-to-calculations.html

Guestrin, C. (2006). Machine Learning. Retrived November 8, 2006, from

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~guestrin/Class/10701/

Hicklin, J., Moler, C., & Webb, P. (2005). JAMA : A Java Matrix Package. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://math.nist.gov/javanumerics/jama/

References

Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/People/tj/publications/joachims_98a.pdf

Joachims, T. (2004). Support Vector Machines. Retrived November 28, 2006, from http://svmlight.joachims.org/

Reuters-21578 Text Categorization Test Collection.

Retrived November 28, 2006, from http://www.daviddlewis.com/resources/testcollections/reuters21578/

SVM - Support Vector Machines. DTREG. Retrived November 28, 2006, from

http://www.dtreg.com/svm.htm

Vapnik, V. N. (2000, 1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory.

Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..