1 / 18

Attitudes towards a possible Eurobachelor in Physics Quality assurance

Report Working group 4. Attitudes towards a possible Eurobachelor in Physics Quality assurance. Urbaan Titulaer, chair Frank van Steenwijk, secr. Claire Demuynck Gintaras Dikcius Jarmo Hietarinta. Acceptance of the “Eurobachelor”. important. somewhat important. unimportant.

evadne
Download Presentation

Attitudes towards a possible Eurobachelor in Physics Quality assurance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report Working group 4 • Attitudes towards a possible Eurobachelor in Physics • Quality assurance Urbaan Titulaer, chair Frank van Steenwijk, secr. Claire Demuynck Gintaras Dikcius Jarmo Hietarinta

  2. Acceptance of the “Eurobachelor”

  3. important somewhat important unimportant Eurobachelor

  4. Expectations for Eurobachelor by region important / somewhat important / unimportant

  5. Questionnaire on quality assurance subjects: Internal quality assurance measures External evaluation Accreditation and benchmarking One questionnaire per country Responses from 34 countries North 12 South 6 New 7 non-EU 9

  6. Course evaluation by students North South New Non-EU (12) (6) (7) (8) Yes, regularly: 24 11 4 6 3 Yes, occasionally: 9 1 2 1 5 No 1 0 0 0 1

  7. Purposes of evaluation North South New Non-EU Quality of teaching 32 12 6 7 7 Determining workload 13 8 1 2 2 Identifying difficulties 20 8 2 3 7

  8. Analysis of causes for drop-out ? Yes 4 Rudimentary 9 No 20 Systematic analysis of examination results ? Yes 3 When needed 19 No 12

  9. Programmes to improve the pedagogical quality of teachers ? North South New Non-EU (12)(6)(7)(9) Yes, by courses or training 10 7 0 3 0 Yes, by mentoring 5 2 0 1 2 No 20 4 6 3 7

  10. Feedback from employers ? North South New Non-EU (12)(6)(7)(9) Yes 1 0 0 0 1 Occasionally 20 8 3 7 2 No 13 4 3 0 6 Feedback from recent graduates ? North South New Non-EU (12)(6)(7)(9) Yes 1 1 0 0 0 Occasionally 20 7 1 5 7 No 13 4 5 2 2

  11. yes, voluntary no, but planned no no info External evaluation ? yes, obligatory

  12. How do you rate the experience ? North South New Non-EU (7)(5)(5)(5) On the whole useful 12 5 3 4 0 Useful, but too much work 10 2 2 1 5 A waste of time 0 0 0 0 0

  13. Consequences from evaluation for the curriculum ? major: 3 minor: 15 none: 6 Consequences for teaching or the organisation of teaching ? major: 5 minor: 11 none: 8 Consequences for the internal quality assurance system ? major: 4 minor: 10 none: 10

  14. yes, obligatory yes, voluntary and common no, but planned no no info Accreditation of study programmes?

  15. How do you rate the experience ? North South New Non-EU (3)(2)(6)(6) On the whole useful 9 3 0 3 3 Useful, but too much work 7 0 1 3 3 Waste of time 1 0 1 0 0

  16. yes no no info Do benchmarks for physics exist ?

  17. Would European benchmarks be useful ? North South New Non-EU (6)(3)(6)(3) Yes 12 3 2 5 2 Maybe 5 2 1 1 1 No 1 1 0 0 0

More Related