1 / 18

Realizing the Roberts Agenda: KPIs

Realizing the Roberts Agenda: KPIs. Chris Park Director of the Graduate School, Lancaster University Senior Associate, Higher Education Academy Chair, the Rugby Team Co-ordinator, QAA Special Review of RDPs. The skills agenda. What? generic and research skills Who?

eternity
Download Presentation

Realizing the Roberts Agenda: KPIs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Realizing the Roberts Agenda: KPIs Chris Park Director of the Graduate School, Lancaster University Senior Associate, Higher Education Academy Chair, the Rugby Team Co-ordinator, QAA Special Review of RDPs

  2. The skills agenda • What? • generic and research skills • Who? • early career researchers • Research students and post-docs • Why? • Personal and professional development • Employability • Knowledge transfer/economy UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  3. Drivers of change • National requirements • Research Councils Joint Skills Statement • Revised QAA Code of Practice • Roberts Review • Additional funding • Roberts money • Internationalisation • Bologna, European HE Area • Lisbon, European Research Area UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  4. Who cares? • National • RCUK, Treasury • Regional • UK GRAD hubs, collaboration • Local • Approach, resourcing and delivery by HEI • Individual • Benefits to the individual research student or post-doc UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  5. Roberts 101 • SET for success [2002] • “… the minimum standards should include the provision of at least two weeks’ dedicated training a year, principally in transferable skills” • Career development for PGR students and postdocs • Funding • Around £20 million a year at ‘steady state’ • HEI allocation proportional to number of RC-funded research students and post-docs • Accountability • Annual Roberts Reports from HEIs to RCUK UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  6. Rugby Team 101 • Establishment • Jan 2005 UK GRAD Roberts Policy Forum • Sector representation • Individual HEIs, HEFCE, RCUK, QAA, NPC, UKCGE, UK GRAD, UUK, HEA, UK HERD • Mission • “to propose a meaningful and workable way of evaluating research skills development in researchers” • Mode of operation • Core team [meetings, email discussion] • Virtual consultative group [email, UK GRAD bulletin board] UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  7. Evaluation - rationale • Feedback to funding bodies such as HEFCE, RCUK • Inform enhancement of quality of experience for researchers by HEIs • Assess impact of recent initiatives on employability of PGRs and post-docs • Monitor engagement of HEIs and the sector in skills development agenda UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  8. Evaluation - approaches • Managerial • Evidence-based decision-making • Performance management – KPIs • Focus – external, compliance and accountability • ‘Softer’ approach • Evidence-based decision-making • Understanding of processes and impacts • Focus – internal, student experience and enhancement UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  9. KPIs favoured by HEIs • First year Roberts Reports • Content analysis of 77 HEIs • Participation in research training programmes • Participant evaluation of training activities • Progression and completion rates • Improvement in employability UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  10. KPIs – some possibilities • INPUT • All courses on institution-wide accessible database • All courses mapped against JSS • THROUGHPUT • % of PGRs who undertake TNA • % of post-docs who undertake TNA • % of PGRs who engage in PDP process • % of post-docs who engage in PDP process UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  11. OUTPUT • Confidential feedback mechanisms for – • PGRs • Post-docs • Supervisors • Leavers • alumni • Survey of employers’ views UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  12. OUTCOME • Institutional submission rate • Institutional completion rate • Institutional non-completion rate • No of refereed papers per PGR • No of refereed papers per post-doc • First destination information UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  13. Roberts Reports, 2006 • Summary of spend 2005-6 • Examples of effective practice on UK GRAD database of practice • Summary report • Management of RTP • Career development and training opportunities • Development of research training and skills development • Sharing processes and practices UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  14. Other sources of evidence • QAA Special Review • Overview Report • Good practice and areas for further consideration, by precept • Includes skills development and research training • Dissemination • Key lessons - Jan 07 Roberts Policy Forum • Present report – Feb 07 UKCGE Winter Conference UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  15. HEA PRES • Postgraduate Research Experience Survey • Online survey (BOS/CROS) • Core set of questions; HEIs add own • Informed by QAA CoP and RCUK skills requirements • Summer 2006 pilot – 8 HEIs • No league tables • HEI sees own results and aggregate • Benchmarking • National launch March 2007 UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  16. HEI approaches to evaluation • RT06 review of institutional practices and approaches • Resource to inform sharing of effective practice UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  17. Roberts – the future? • Not yet clear • Comprehensive Spending Review • Likely outcome • Continued funding on sustained basis? • Mode of allocation to HEIs unchanged? • Not necessarily ring-fenced [through HEFCE grant?] • Future reporting requirements? UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

  18. What next? • Rugby Team recommendations • “That RCUK should … • “fund a national survey of the extent to which researchers and academics have engaged with the skills development agenda, and run it during 2007” • “agree a stable format for future HEI reports on their use of Roberts monies, and make this known to the sector by late summer 2007” • “scope and fund a project designed to answer the question ‘what is the impact on the UK economy of the skills development funded by Roberts money?’, beginning during 2007, to be carried out on a consultancy basis by someone with appropriate expertise.” UK GRAD Yorks & NE Hub - Dealing with KPIs

More Related