1 / 31

Social Psychology: Meeting of the Minds

Social Psychology: Meeting of the Minds. Today’s topics. Stereotypes and prejudice Perceiving causes of behavior – attribution Interpersonal attraction Dealing with authority, compliance, obedience and helping. Social Organizations. Group Norms Injunctive norms Descriptive norms

etenia
Download Presentation

Social Psychology: Meeting of the Minds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Psychology:Meeting of the Minds

  2. Today’s topics • Stereotypes and prejudice • Perceiving causes of behavior – attribution • Interpersonal attraction • Dealing with authority, compliance, obedience and helping

  3. Social Organizations • Group • Norms • Injunctive norms • Descriptive norms • Perceived norms • Roles • Status hierarchy

  4. What is a group? • Two or more people who interact with and influence one another over a period of time, and who depend upon one another and share common goals and a collective identity.

  5. Norms • Norms: learned, socially based rules that prescribe what people should or should not do • We follow them • Expect others to follow them • Hard to verbalize, but we know when we see a violation • Make situations more comfortable and less uncertain comfortable  creates social order

  6. Norms of social behavior: Elevators

  7. The Stanford Prison Experiment Power of the Situation – 12:20-20:00

  8. Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment Major factors that enabled brutality: • Obedience to Authority • Experimenter gave orders to guards and encouraged tough behavior • Deindividuation • The loss of one’s sense of individuality and a loosening of normative constraints against deviant behavior • Guards wore uniforms, mirrored sunglasses • Anonimity • Dehumanization • Prisoners stripped, wore prisoner clothes, given numbers as names

  9. Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment Parallels to real-life examples? • e.g., abuse of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib • Obedience to Authority: Intimidation practices from higher-ups, encouraged to “soften” prisoner • Deindividuation: American soldiers wore same uniforms (anonymity), language barrier • Dehumanization: Iraqi prisoners stripped, kept in dirty cells, blindfolds/bags over heads, use of dogs

  10. Yielding to Others • Conformity • A yielding to perceived group pressure.

  11. Find the matching line 1 2 3 Conformity: Asch’s Studies

  12. Match the line on the left to one on the right: Suppose everyone in the class said that 1 matched. What would you do?

  13. Conformity • When people change their behavior or beliefs in order to match those of other members of a group. • Ex. Peer pressure…

  14. Asch’s Studies of Conformity • What did the participant do? • 70% conformed at least once! • Most said they knew answer was wrong but didn’t want to look peculiar

  15. Obedience: The performance of an action in response to a direct order.

  16. Teacher and Learner The Milgram Studies: Obedience to Authority

  17. Scripted responses of Mr. Wallace, the learner • 75 volts: • moan and grunt • 150 volts: • demand to be released • 180 volts: • cried out that he could not longer stand the pain • 300 volts: • protested that he had a heart condition and insisted that he would not longer take part in the experiment • 315+: • Ominous silence

  18. Scripted responses of the experimenter Gave these responses in this order, as needed: • “Please go on” • “Teacher, you must go on; your job is to punish the learner’s mistakes” • “The experiment requires that you continue” • “Teacher you have no other choice” video

  19. The Milgram Studies • Psychiatrists predicted 2% would go to maximum level • What would you do?

  20. Degree of obedience • 100% compliance until 210 volts • Only 5 % stopped before 300 volts • 65% went all the way to 450 Volts!!!

  21. Power of the situation 8:00 – 12:00 The Milgram Studies

  22. Compliance • When people change in behavior because of a request. • How is compliance brought about? • If you want something, ask! • What about… “If you want something, ask for something else”!? • Foot in the door technique • Get person to agree to small request then ask for something larger • Sign to put “drive carefully” on lawn • 17% agree on 1st round • 55% agreed after signing a petition weeks earlier • Why does this work? • Commitment • Door in the face procedure • Ask for something big that will surely be denied, then ask for something smaller… • Appears to be a compromise… (framing!)

  23. Compliance • Six principles • Friendship/liking • Commitment/consistency • Scarcity • Reciprocity • Social validation • Authority

  24. Helping • An act that is intended to help another person • Factors that influence: • Clarity of need • Presence of others • Perceived closeness

  25. When we help • An act that is intended to help another person • Factors that influence: • Clarity of need • Presence of others • Perceived closeness

  26. Clarity of need • Sometimes it is not clear if/who needs help… • Notice & Interpret as emergency • Asking for help makes a difference!

  27. Discovering Psychology Power of the situation 20:08-20:55

  28. Questions raised by Milgram & Zimbardo • How can we explain evil acts? • Other examples from history? • Are people ever inherently evil? • Or do situations cause evil? • Ethical issues of this type of research • But is research worthwhile?

  29. Relationships: Liking • Repeated contact • Similarity • Physical attraction

  30. Relationships: Loving • Passionate love • Compassionate love • Sternberg’s triangular model of love • Passion • Intimacy • Commitment • Attachment style

  31. Relationships • Making love last • Similarity • More sex than arguments • Intimacy of thoughts and feelings • Shared decision making and daily burdens • Mating preferences • Evolutionary theory • Social exchange theory

More Related