1 / 8

Endemic spp ~12000

Threatened species ~ 2000. Planning for biodiversity: SEA as a tool IAIA Prague’05: Session C6:1. Endemic spp ~12000.

erna
Download Presentation

Endemic spp ~12000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Threatened species ~ 2000 Planning for biodiversity: SEA as a tool IAIA Prague’05: Session C6:1 Endemic spp ~12000

  2. “The most important lesson of the last ten years is that the objectives of the Convention will be impossible to meet until consideration of biodiversity is fully integrated into other sectors. The need to mainstream the conservation and sustainable use of biological resources across all sectors of the national economy, the society and the policy-making framework is a complex challenge at the heart of the Convention.”(Hague Ministerial Declaration from COP VI to WSSD, 2002)

  3. Biodiversity-inclusive SEA helps: • Build results of biodiversity planning into development plans • Ensure uses and values for biodiversity are recognised • Identify better outcomes for biodiversity • Identify and manage cumulative threats • Plan for no net loss of biodiversity or for net +ve gain • Identify monitoring needs • Strengthen biodiversity partnerships and information networks

  4. Barriers to good practice • Biodiversity not mainstreamed as a planning consideration • People depending on biodiversity are not involved in the planning process • Policy directions and legal requirements unclear (eg aspirational targets only) • Biodiversity data held by many parties without coordination • Insufficient data to enable reliable comparisons or predictions

  5. Conditions for good practice • SEA has clear and transparent role as an integral part of a coordinated planning process and this process recognises biodiversity as a fundamental issue • Biodiversity policies shape decisions. Clear policy framework and priority actions • Biodiversity values and needs are well understood and fully accounted for • Well-established partnerships and coordinated data and information management • Reliable data on distribution, status, trends for biodiversity indicators

  6. Q1Does biodiversity planning need SEA?

  7. Which ecosystem services need to be sustained for different people’s needs to be met: will the proposed plan have a positive or negative effect on biodiversity uses and values? Q2Is SEA a good way to engage the public and to ensure planners recognise biodiversity uses and values?

  8. Q3Does good planning build biodiversity into plans anyway?

More Related