1 / 38

Investigating Teachers’ Expectations For Using Telecollaborative Project Work

Investigating Teachers’ Expectations For Using Telecollaborative Project Work. Barry S. Kramer Lehigh University. Telecollaborative Project Work Objectives. Definitions The Problem The Need for Research Methodology Research Timetable Case Study Results Large Group Survey Results

erling
Download Presentation

Investigating Teachers’ Expectations For Using Telecollaborative Project Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Investigating Teachers’ Expectations For Using Telecollaborative Project Work Barry S. Kramer Lehigh University

  2. Telecollaborative Project WorkObjectives • Definitions • The Problem • The Need for Research • Methodology • Research Timetable • Case Study Results • Large Group Survey Results • Review of Research Questions • Implications for Practice • Suggestions for Future Research • Questions

  3. Telecollaborative Project WorkWhat Is Telecollaboration? Telecollaboration is a structured activity in which students use Internet tools such as e-mail, chat, Web pages, blogs, podcasts, etc. to access, process and share data and to communicate, cooperate and collaborate.

  4. Telecollaborative Project WorkWhat Is Telecollaborative Project Work? Telecollaborative project work is a term that has developed to describe online student project work that combines the use of telecollaboration and some form of a project-based activity.

  5. Telecollaborative Project WorkReasons Teachers Should Use Telecollaborative Projects Student Centered Reasons • Skill Development • Social Growth Teacher Centered Reasons • Professional • Personal

  6. Telecollaborative Project WorkMotivating Questions When teachers sign up their classes to participate in a telecollaborative project… • What are teachers expecting to happen? • What actually happens? • What would teachers do to improve the experience? • Did teachers gain anything personally from the experience? • Would teachers participate again? Why or Why not?

  7. Telecollaborative Project WorkLiterature Review Research Context: Foundations of Telecollaboration • Constructivist Learning Theory • Constructivist Learning Environments • Project-Based Learning • Collaborative Learning What Should A Telecollaborative Experience Be Like? • Global Learning Communities • Telecollaboration • Current Support • Learning Circles What Are Teachers’ Expecting? • ICT Use in Education • Function of ICT in Telecollaborative Project Work • Reasons for Teachers to Use This Methodology • Criticisms Ethnographic Analysis of Telecollaborative Project Work

  8. Telecollaborative Project WorkLearning Circles • This study centered around the investigation of a group of teachers participating in a telecollaborative project called Learning Circles. • Learning Circles has a long track record of participation and a structured timeline of 16 weeks. • Teachers indicate the grade level of their students and their general area of project interest. There are four large topic areas: Computer Chronicles, Mindworks, Places and Perspectives, My Hero. Teachers are then grouped by grade level and area of interest. Generally, not every theme and grade level runs. Teachers often get their second or third choice.

  9. Telecollaborative Project WorkCase Within Case Study • This Learning Circles project was comprised of a large group of teachers who were divided into smaller project groups called Circles. • Case within - smaller group of 7 elementary teachers who participated in a specific project called Places and Perspectives. • Investigation focused on the experience of the small project group to provide individual stories, and utilized the larger group of teachers to confirm and triangulate findings that emerged.

  10. Telecollaborative Project WorkSources of Data Surveys Message Analysis Interviews Document Analysis

  11. Telecollaborative Project WorkResearch Design: Large Group Online surveying of Learning Circle participants Initial Survey: Open-ended questions Identify participants for case studies Establish list of initial teacher expectations Interim Survey 1 : Likert type scale Evaluate initial list of teacher expectations Adjust expectations Evaluate progress during project Interim Survey 2 : Likert type scale Evaluate initial or adjusted teacher expectations Adjust expectations Evaluate progress during project Post Survey : Likert type scale Evaluate initial or adjusted teacher expectations Evaluate progress during project Evaluate future participation

  12. Telecollaborative Project WorkResearch Schedule September 2008 Learning Circle Registration Learning Circle Phase: Getting Ready Initial Survey Select Participants for Case Studies October 2008 Learning Circle Phase: Opening the Circle Learning Circle Phase: Planning Student Projects Interim Survey 1 November 2008 Learning Circle Phase: Exchanging Student Work December 2008 Learning Circle Phase: Organizing Circle Publication Interim Survey 2 January 2009 Learning Circle Phase: Closing the Circle Post Survey January - April 2009 Analysis of Data Completion of Dissertation

  13. Telecollaborative Project WorkSurveys Survey Questions • How is Learning Circles meeting your expectations? How is Learning Circles meeting your expectations? • Have your expectations changed since you began the project? • How are the outcomes to students you anticipated meeting your expectations? • How are the areas of personal growth you anticipated meeting your expectations? • Please rate your overall experience with Learning Circles. • Describe how your Learning Circle experience is going so far? What is working well for you? What is not working? • Please use this space to share or express any information that you believe would be of interest or use to this research or the researchers.

  14. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 1 1. What are the expectations teachers have for their students and themselves that motivate them to use telecollaborative project work in a K-12 school setting? • Expectations included: providing a global education experience, improving language skills, adding telecollaboration as a new teaching methodology, improving students’ use of technology, and providing enrichment to the curriculum. • Teachers believed Learning Circles would promote student global awareness and expose their students to other cultures. Telecollaboration is a structured activity in which students use Internet tools such as e-mail, chat, Web pages, blogs, podcasts, etc. to access, process and share data and to communicate, cooperate and collaborate.

  15. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 1A 1A. How do these expectations change over time as teachers and students participate in a telecollaborative project? • Teachers in the small research group did believe overall that the Learning Circles process was meeting their expectations. They were also able to reflect more on how their expectations had changed. • Some of the larger group members were frustrated by the lack of responses by their Circle members, and they were not able to fully realize the expectations they initially had for the project. • In the end, both groups seemed satisfied with their experience and it is possible that had individual stories been collected from the large group they would have displayed a more positive outlook on their experience.

  16. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 1B 1B. What do teachers believe they and their students have gained by participating in a telecollaborative project? • Student Expectations: • 43.9% - promote student global awareness and exposure to other cultures, 22.0% - provide students with opportunities to improve their language and communication skills. • Student interest, motivation, collaboration, and focus on telecollaborative project work were chosen by two-thirds of the teachers

  17. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 1B 1B. What do teachers believe they and their students have gained by participating in a telecollaborative project? • Teacher Expectations: • The case study teachers were more definite that their major area of growth was in developing skills to successfully implement a telecollaborative project. • The large group of teachers was mixed among their areas of growth and was not definitive about what they had gained.

  18. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 1C 1C. What are the suggestions of teachers on changes that could be made to a telecollaborative project experience to improve their future participation? • Case study group. The small case study group of teachers did not view their experience in a negative way and only one teacher offered a major suggestion for improving the process. • Large group. The large group of teachers offered more suggestions on how to improve the process so that they could be more successful in their future participation. • Real-time communication and Web 2.0 tools • Teacher collaboration and support • More time • Specific concerns

  19. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 2 - Technology Integration 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods,and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? • The roles case study participants fulfilled in the Circle matched their level of experience. The two experienced teachers clearly took the lead and provided direction and structure to the group. The other participants appeared to follow their lead and did not explore other ways to publish projects. • The participants as a group were new to telecollaboration and this showed in their responses on what they were expecting from their participation for their students and themselves. The finished projects and general flow of the project did not show many standout participants and this was not a session that featured innovation.

  20. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 2 - PrBL 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods, and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? • The ratings and testimonies of the case study group indicated that they had some knowledge of how to organize students for project work, but they did not indicate a well thought out plan that would indicate the use of project-based learning or problem-based learning. • The large group members also completed the PrBL Profile. Their Profile ratings and their years of experience indicated that this group had knowledge of PrBL methodologies and some experience, but they were not strong proponents or regular users. There was not strong evidence that the participants had given much thought to applying a learning methodology such as PrBL to their participation in Learning Circles..

  21. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 2 - Collaboration 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods, and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? • The case study group struggled with how toincorporate collaboration. • For the large group in general this session of Learning Circles was characterized by a major lack of collaboration or collaborative structures among the members. • The opportunity to work together with students from other parts of the world was a major expectation expressed by the majority of teachers. Yet, when it came time to develop Project Ideas teachers struggled with how to incorporate collaboration.

  22. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 2 - Obstacles 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods, and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? • The obstacles did have an effect on the participation level and completeness of the projects, but they did not prevent the group from completing their primary goals and participating in the Circle process. • Teachers in the large group who definitely experienced obstacles to their participation such a technical problems and an uneven level of participation. • The biggest obstacle teachers faced was lack of time.

  23. Telecollaborative Project WorkResults: Question 2 - Enablers 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods, and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? • Teachers had high expectations that there would be enablers to guide them through the project and they seemed pleased that they were there. • Teachers in the large group found many enablers during the process that helped them to achieve a level of success such as the structure of the project. • Teachers requested more enabling structures to create more student conversation and dialogue.

  24. Telecollaborative Project Work Results: Question 3 3. What are the experiences of teachers as they use telecollaborative project work in a K-12 school setting that influence their future participation? • Both the small case study group of teachers and the larger group of teachers were unanimous in their decision that they would participate again in Learning Circles in the future. • The case study group seemed less deterred by their obstacles and lack of completeness. • The group continued to move forward even when a few members were quiet for an extended period of time or had stopped their participation. • By the end of the project everyone had met some of their expectations and this was enough to view Learning Circles as a project they would choose again in the future.

  25. Telecollaborative Project WorkImplications For Practice Criticisms: • Are there unique attributes of telecollaboration” • Why is their low usage? • What is the cause of the apparent silence in the literature regarding its practice?

  26. Telecollaborative Project WorkImplications For Practice Implications: • In order for telecollaborative project work tocontinue and flourish there will have to be support organizations that support the practice at an affordable cost for teachers and schools. • It is still a new practice to many teachersand usually appears to be something only a few technology-oriented teachers practice. • Even though there is an increase in the use of technology in schools it still has not fully impacted curriculum or how teachers provide instruction. • Telecollaboration for most teachers continues to be an add-on activity. Teachers continue to find it difficult to fit into the curriculum.

  27. Telecollaborative Project WorkImplications For Practice Implications: • Teachers may be misunderstanding the goals of telecollaborative work and may be valuing the social and cultural value more than the value of the collaborative project work. • There is clearly a mismatch between levels of technology use and development throughout the world. • Participants in telecollaborative work also have different definitions of commitment.

  28. Telecollaborative Project WorkSuggestions for Future Research • Improved teacher training in telecollaboration, teacher social networking, or teacher instruction on the use of project-based learning and problem-based learning methodologies • Further testing of the Project-based Learning Profile • Investigation into enabling structures that support these phases of project work • New Web 2.0 tools such as Wikis, blogs, Skype, and online collaboration Websites such as Elluminate • What strategies can be developed to promote the use telecollaborative project work among teachers and students around the world?

  29. Telecollaborative Project WorkQuestions

  30. Telecollaborative Project WorkCase Study Test Survey Instruments • Initial Survey • Interim Surveys • Post Survey • PrBL Indicators • Interview process • Follow-up interviews Changes • Adjust the language on some survey questions • Addition of more questions investigating project approach and use of PrBL models

  31. Telecollaborative Project WorkCase Study Patterns of Behavior • Teachers definitely developed or changed their expectations based on the how the project was going • Teachers wanted more communication, but they wanted someone else to initiate it. • Teachers were quick to follow someone else’s lead - the first person often was the pace setter

  32. Telecollaborative Project WorkCase Study Information Gained • Teachers do have definite expectations for students • Global Education - exposure to other cultures • Use of ICT • Improve use of English as second language by interacting with native speakers • Real audience for project work • Teachers have expectations for themselves • Add use of ICT to class - add some excitement • Improve their own skills in use of ICT • Make global connections with other teachers

  33. Telecollaborative Project WorkCase Study Emerging Areas of Interest • The impact of the use of PrBL or project-based teaching approaches - Do teachers find more success when they use project based approaches? • Is their a relationship between teachers’ discovering how to integrate PrBL methodologies and their decision to continue participation? • Are teachers who use PrBL approaches less dependent on other participants for success?

  34. Telecollaborative Project WorkResearch Design: Small Group Data Collection Cycle • Administer the initial information teachers survey • Identify participants for case study through online survey information • Conduct initial interviews • Validity checks after each interview session • Follow up interviews as needed • Interim update interviews by email and phone every two weeks • Larger group survey and open-ended questions at weeks 5 and 10 • Record observations of group interactions and patterns of behavior • Collect examples of online postings, discussions, and email exchanges • Collect examples of posted student work and finished projects • Conduct post interviews and surveys

  35. Telecollaborative Project WorkData Analysis Analysis Cycle • Assemble raw case data • Organize, classify, and edit raw case data • Analyze and code data for concepts, typologies, and themes • Identify patterns, categories, and themes • Identify consistencies and changes of expectations • Draw conclusions and interpret findings according to emerging issues

  36. Telecollaborative Project WorkParticipants • Large group: 57 teachers who were members of the International Education and Resource Network and chose to participate in the Learning Circles project from September 2008 through January 2009. • Small Group: From the large group, a Circle of seven teachers who chose the Places and Perspectives geography theme. Description of the case study group: • Elementary level • Five classrooms from North America, one from Morocco, and one from Slovenia • Five participants new to telecollaborative project work and two experienced participants.

  37. Telecollaborative Project WorkResearch Questions This study investigated the following research questions: 1. What are the expectations teachers have for their students and themselves that motivate them to use telecollaborative project work in a K-12 school setting? A. How do these expectations change over time as teachers and students participate in a telecollaborative project? • What do teachers believe they and their students have gained by participating in a telecollaborative project? • What are the suggestions of teachers on changes that could be made to telecollaborative project experience to improve their future participation?

  38. Telecollaborative Project WorkResearch Questions This study investigated the following research questions: 2. To what degree do teachers’ level of technology integration, use of project-based learning methods, and collaboration, as well as the obstacles and enablers they work with affect their expectations and participation in a telecollaborative project? 3. What are the experiences of teachers, as they use telecollaborative project work in a K-12 school setting, that influence their future participation?

More Related