1 / 20

ENUM in Australia

ENUM in Australia. Neill Whitehead Manager, Numbering Australian Communications Authority Telephone (03) 9963 6844 Facsimile (03) 9963 6899 Email: neill.whitehead@aca.gov.au. Contents. Workshop objectives History of ENUM in Australia Current status Issues that need to be resolved.

ena
Download Presentation

ENUM in Australia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ENUM in Australia Neill Whitehead Manager, Numbering Australian Communications Authority Telephone (03) 9963 6844 Facsimile (03) 9963 6899 Email: neill.whitehead@aca.gov.au

  2. Contents Workshop objectives History of ENUM in Australia Current status Issues that need to be resolved

  3. Workshop objectives • Provide information • Assess levels of interest • Seek feedback on some issues • Identify other issues to be explored • Commence preparations for a discussion group and possibly a trial

  4. History of ENUM in Australia • The ACA is monitoring ENUM developments • Increasingly, ENUM is being looked at by different organisations within Australia • The ACA’s involvement includes giving presentations, holding meetings, attending international meetings and releasing discussion papers seeking feedback on issues associated with ENUM

  5. ENUM public discussion paper • Discussion paper released September 2002 • Sought feedback on 13 different questions • 21 responses were received • These responses, plus a consolidated summary, are available from the ACA website

  6. ENUM public discussion paper (cont) • All submissions agreed that ENUM has important implications for privacy • However, there were different views regarding authentication, security and access to the database • There was no consensus what ENUM is for • Is ENUM a ‘routing protocol’, ‘directory service’ or both?

  7. ENUM public discussion paper (cont) • General agreement that registry and registrar functions should be separate • Many CSPs suggested that they are well placed to operate the registry • Some suggested that the ACA should operate the registry

  8. ENUM public discussion paper (cont) • All agreed that ENUM should be set up on an opt-in basis when used as a directory service (however, for routing, opt-in may not be appropriate) • There was disagreement about whether ENUM required new or unique numbers • The feedback received was used to generate additional questions (more on that later)

  9. Current status

  10. Technology adoption life cycle (Geoffrey Moore, Chasm Group) Main market Innovators (techies) Early majority (pragmatists) Laggards (sceptics) Early adopters (visionaries) Late majority (conservatives)

  11. ENUM Technology adoption life cycle Main market Innovators (techies) Early majority (pragmatists) Laggards (sceptics) Early adopters (visionaries) Late majority (conservatives)

  12. Visibility Peak of inflated expectations Plateau of productivity Slope of enlightenment Trough of disillusionment Technology trigger Time Gartner Hype cycle (Gartner Group)

  13. Visibility Peak of inflated expectations ENUM Plateau of productivity Slope of enlightenment Trough of disillusionment Technology trigger Time Gartner Hype cycle

  14. Spread of interest & concern More interest, less concern ISPs, some research organisations Telecommunication companies Consumers, privacy advocates Less interest, more concern

  15. Issues that need to resolved • Is the prime use of ENUM expected to be as a routing service or a directory service? • What is your organisation’s interest in ENUM? • If ENUM is a routing service, what technical solutions could be used to route the calls?

  16. Issues that need to resolved (cont) • Can ENUM be used to assist routing of calls from IP networks to the PSTN and vice versa? Are there limitations to the way in which ENUM can assist routing of calls? • Can the role of ENUM as a directory service and ENUM as a routing service be separated?

  17. Issues that need to resolved (cont) • Are there any alternatives to ENUM? • Should the ACA take a ‘wait and see’ approach to ENUM and observe international events until it is satisfied that: • there is significant industry demand for ENUM, and/or • the role of ENUM is better defined?

  18. Issues that need to resolved (cont) • If ENUM is only a part solution to the convergence of the PSTN with IP networks, why is it worth pursuing? • Does ENUM need a separate number range, either for testing purposes or for any other purpose? • ETSI TS 102 172: Minimum Requirements for Interoperability of European ENUM Trials

  19. Issues that need to resolved (cont) • How can the personal data contained in the ENUM database, Domain Name System, and the WHOIS database be protected from use for unwanted purposes such as telemarketing or SPAM?

  20. Questions?

More Related