Experimental aviation grids at national weather service marquette michigan
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 30

Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 117 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan. Steven Fleegel NWS Marquette, MI. Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop Webinar Series. May 14, 2013. Overview. Started as a part of experimental Fire Weather grid creation in February 2012

Download Presentation

Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Experimental aviation grids at national weather service marquette michigan

Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan

Steven Fleegel

NWS Marquette, MI

Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop Webinar Series

May 14, 2013


Overview

Overview

  • Started as a part of experimental Fire Weather grid creation in February 2012

    • Creating Ceiling and Visibility grids

  • Tools and Procedures were modified and created in Graphical Forecast Editor (GFE) to use a consensus approach

    • Averaged the derived model ceilings and explicit model visibilities

    • Completely hands off for forecasters


Overview cont

Overview - cont.

  • This proved useful to the forecasters in giving a rough idea on potential ceiling/visibilities across the County Warning Area (CWA)

    • Very helpful with timing

  • Created hourly through first 12 hours and then every 3 hours after that through 72 hours

    • Originally created every 3 hours through 60 hours


What was done in gfe

What was done in GFE

  • Added Ceiling and Visibility (Vsby) grids to the Forecast (Fcst) database

    • Originally, the ceiling grids were derived on the fly and calculated based off model RH

  • Ceiling grids were converted to background processing (smartInits) with the transition to calculations based on RH with respect to Ice (March 2013)

    • Vsby grids were also converted to smartInits at this time

  • This conversion allowed the consensus calculations to be enhanced

    • Hourly calculations in the first 12 hours

      • Hourly model data when available and interpolated 3 or 6 hour model data.

    • Weights to increase emphasis on preferred models


Models included

Models Included

Ceiling

Visibility

NAM12

MET Guidance

NAM 4km Nest

MAV Guidance (Beyond 12-hours)

WRF-ARW (local 20km and 5km)

HRRR

HRRR (Previous)

Gridded LAMP

Gridded LAMP (Previous)

NCEP WRF-ARW East

NCEP WRF-NMM East

  • NAM12

  • MET Guidance

  • GFS40

  • MAV Guidance (beyond 12-hours)

  • RAP X2

  • RAP (Previous)

  • WRF-ARW (local 5km) X2

  • RuMM1/2 (3 hourly local 3km WRF-ARW initialized off RAP)

  • Gridded LAMP

  • Gridded LAMP (Previous)

GFE and AWIPS data limitations exclude using GEM (NH and Regional), ECMWF, NCEP WRFs Ceiling data


How the forecasters see the data

How the Forecasters see the Data

  • Example of a Ceiling grid in GFE

  • Uses a color table to match Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC)

    • Help forecasters quickly see areas of concern


What was done in avnfps

What was done in AvnFPS

  • The data is also available to the Aviation forecasters through the AvnFPS TAF Editor

  • Forecaster feedback has been positive to this addition

    • Helps them with timing for TAFs

  • Did have to make minor background adjustments due to local labeling

    • Will likely be transitioning towards more consistent labeling with AWIPS 2

Vsby

Sky

Ceiling


Case study march 11 2013

Case Study – March 11, 2013

Low pressure system moving northeast through the Great Lakes region


March 11 2013 00z

March 11, 2013 – 00Z

Ceiling

Visibility

Surface Chart


March 11 2013 06z

March 11, 2013 – 06Z

Ceiling

Visibility

Surface Chart


March 11 2013 12z

March 11, 2013 – 12Z

Ceiling

Visibility

Surface Chart


Quick verification background

Quick Verification Background

Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC)


March 11 2013 verification

March 11, 2013 - Verification

KSAW – Sawyer International Airport

3/10 – 18Z

3/11 – 00Z

3/10 – 06Z

24hrs Out

12hrs Out

6hrs Out

MVFRMust File AlternateIFRAlternate Landing MinsAirfield Landing Mins


Kcmx march 19 th 2013 snow

KCMX – March 19th, 2013 Snow

KCMX – Houghton County Memorial Airport

March 17, 2013 – 18Z Forecast

  • Low pressure system moving east out of the Northern Plains and across Lake Superior

  • Hit alternate landing minimum visibilities within an hour or two at 30 hours out

    • Extremely useful for Outlook portion of TAF forecast


Shallow moisture case 03 08 2013

Shallow Moisture Case – 03/08/2013

Light winds and lingering moisture trapped below subsidence associated with high pressure over the Great Lakes


Shallow moisture case cont

Shallow Moisture Case – cont.

Model initial conditions – March 08, 2013 00Z

RAP

GFS

NAM


Shallow moisture cont

Shallow Moisture – cont.

  • With the reliance on model data, the Aviation Grids struggled

    • Forecasters also struggled with timing of wind becoming offshore

      • Forecaster Aviation discussion mention timing uncertainty on clouds

      • 00z TAF had conditions scattering out at 02Z

    • But at least the TAF forecast had the right idea


Verification

Verification

  • In order to quantify the biases and identify areas of improvement, verification was started in February 2013

  • Caveats

    • Local NDFD Verification

      • Only Hourly obs at the top of the hour

      • Looks at ceiling height with no restriction by cloud cover

      • Looked at 2 of our 3 TAF sites

        • Left out KIWD (Ironwood, MI) due to inconsistent observations

    • Stats on Demand (NWS Verification)

      • 5min obs and calculation

      • Has in-between obs (Specials)


Ksaw 0 6hr verification

KSAW – 0-6hr Verification


Kcmx 0 6hr verification

KCMX – 0-6hr Verification


Ksaw 6 24hr verification

KSAW – 6-24hr Verification


Kcmx 6 24hr verification

KCMX – 6-24hr Verification


Aviation grids performance

Aviation Grids – Performance

  • Positives

    • Synoptic systems

      • As long as there is model consistency

    • Visibility

      • Values and timing

      • Model derived data versus calculated like ceilings

    • Recently improved ceilings in lake effect areas

      • Due to relative humidity calculations with respect to ice


Aviation grids shortcomings

Aviation Grids - Shortcomings

  • Shallow Moist Layers

    • Models have same issue

    • Plus, with GFE only having data every 25mb, it is easy for those shallow layers to be missed

  • Timing the end of lake effect snow and clouds

    • Models have same issue

  • Very low ceilings

    • Due to the way the consensus is averaged

      • One model showing 20,000 foot ceilings can quickly raise the other models consensus of 500 feet

    • Doesn't represent lower ceilings or vertical visibility (VV) due to Blowing Snow (BLSN) or heavy snow (+SN)

      • Potential improvement based off Forecast

        • Tool could use BLSN or +SN to adjust ceiling values to increase consistency with the forecast


Cac category distribution ksaw

CAC Category Distribution - KSAW

  • Issue with lack of lower ceilings can be seen in frequency comparisons

    • Biased towards VFR conditions

      • Misses IFR and lower

    • Visibility has a fairly even distribution in all categories


Recent improvements

Recent Improvements

  • Changes made at the beginning of March have improved lower ceiling errors

    • RH with respect to Ice

    • Hourly Calculations in the first 12 hours

  • Has greatly reduced the high bias for MVFR and lower Ceilings


Future work

Future Work

  • Main focus will be improving Ceiling forecasts for IFR and lower conditions

  • Perform Summertime convection verification

  • Incorporate some influence of the Forecast to visibility and ceiling

  • Generate experimental TAFs like some NWS Eastern Region offices

    • Would help simplify verification, since it would be incorporated into Stats on Demand


Future work cont

Future Work – cont.

  • Expand Gridded Database to web for aviation customers

    • Point and Click and Forecast Graphics

      • Similar to Jackson, KY, Charleston, WV, etc.


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Visibility Grids – Definitely shows skill

    • Verification over last two months indicates that it is as good or slightly better than our TAFs

  • Ceiling Grids – Showing improvement

    • But still struggles with IFR and lower values

  • A good start

    • Believe that using this as a starting point and then adding forecaster intervention would create a superior product for the TAF sites and our CWA as a whole


Contact information

Contact Information

  • Steven Fleegel – [email protected]

  • NWS Marquette, MI


  • Login