Wildlife and habitat issues for planning and response
Download
1 / 18

Wildlife and Habitat Issues for Planning and Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 252 Views
  • Uploaded on

Wildlife and Habitat Issues for Planning and Response Maine Dept. of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife Oil Spill Advisory Council September 16, 2008 Why Care About “Critters” in the Middle of an Oil Spill? Altruist: Direct and indirect loss of Maine’s natural resources

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Wildlife and Habitat Issues for Planning and Response' - emily


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Wildlife and habitat issues for planning and response l.jpg
Wildlife and Habitat Issues for Planning and Response

Maine Dept. of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife

Oil Spill Advisory Council

September 16, 2008


Why care about critters in the middle of an oil spill l.jpg
Why Care About “Critters” in the Middle of an Oil Spill?

  • Altruist: Direct and indirect loss of Maine’s natural resources

  • Capitalist: NRDA – source of funding to benefit wildlife/habitat

  • Realist: Public perception


Altruist direct losses dead birds l.jpg
AltruistDirect Losses = Dead Birds

  • Most critical for Endangered/Threatened species

  • Easiest type of loss to document

  • and claim for NRDA

  • Most visible to the public


Altruist indirect losses from habitat damage l.jpg
AltruistIndirect Losses from Habitat Damage

  • Potentially catastrophic deaths, but after-the-fact

  • Much harder to document and claim for NRDA

  • Less noticed by the public


Capitalist natural resource damage assessment l.jpg
CapitalistNatural Resource Damage Assessment

  • Not being used to full potential

  • Priority during a response?


Realist public perceptions l.jpg
RealistPublic Perceptions

  • Largely beyond our (IFW’s) control

  • Media focuses on what sells (dead birds)

  • Press releases controlled from ICP

  • (IFW staff in Planning/Operations)


Oil spill planning at ifw l.jpg
Oil Spill Planning at IFW

  • Mapping the natural resources

  • - Geographic vulnerabilities

  • - NRDA baselines

  • Response


Vulnerability of wildlife habitats implications of loss l.jpg
Vulnerability of Wildlife & HabitatsImplications of Loss

  • Endangered/Threatened Species

  • High value habitats

  • - Critical to E/T species

  • - High biodiversity

  • - Unique areas

  • - Regulated habitats


Vulnerability of wildlife habitats susceptibility to damage l.jpg
Vulnerability of Wildlife & HabitatsSusceptibility to Damage

  • Species – behaviors & physiology affect:

  • - Likelihood of being oiled

  • - Extent of oiling

  • - Ability to survive being oiled

  • Habitats – type & location affect:

  • - Likelihood of being oiled

  • - Difficulty of clean-up

  • - Ability to recover from being oiled


Response planning l.jpg
Response Planning

  • Many similarities to efforts of others

  • Big Difference: surveys for EVI

  • - LARGE task

  • - Always dealing with incomplete/outdated information

  • Have only 1 dedicated staff member


Ifw staff resources l.jpg
IFW Staff Resources

  • Oil Spill Biologist (Bangor)

  • Regional Staff

  • - 3 Coastal Regional Offices

  • - 2-3 Staff per office

  • Bird Biologists (2-3)


Response typical sequence l.jpg
Response – Typical Sequence

  • Initial Damage Assessment

  • - Based on EVI maps

  • - Superficial (no direct observation)

  • - Limited by accuracy & completeness of pre-mapped data

  • - Good start


Response typical sequence13 l.jpg
Response – Typical Sequence

  • Secondary Damage Assessment

  • - Field reconnaissance

  • - May not occur (depends on EVI, DEP responders)

  • - With so few staff & other priorities, may take time

  • - May conflict/compete with other response activities

  • - Hotzone training


Response recover rehabilitate oiled wildlife l.jpg
ResponseRecover & Rehabilitate Oiled Wildlife

  • Rehabilitation is challenging

  • Limited facilities with local

  • rehabilitators

  • IBRRC for anything big (facilities

  • still an issue)

  • Even in best possible situation,

  • success rate is low

  • IFW’s primary roles:

  • - Collecting oiled wildlife

  • - Supervising volunteers to transport

  • wildlife


Response collect document dead wildlife l.jpg
ResponseCollect/Document Dead Wildlife


Response continue surveys for additional oiled wildlife habitat l.jpg
Response:Continue Surveys for Additional Oiled Wildlife & Habitat


Ifw oil spill response issues l.jpg
IFW Oil Spill Response Issues

  • Training

  • - Hotzone?

  • - Most exercises simulate Day 1-2;

  • Wildlife response really begins later

  • Long Deployment

  • - Union contract doesn’t allow OT

  • - Other priorities

  • “Big” vs. “Little” incident/response


Conclusions l.jpg
Conclusions

  • Planning for and dealing with the effects of oil spills

  • on wildlife & habitat are big, challenging tasks

  • but we are just a small agency

  • We do have a dedicated Oil Spill Biologist

  • Contract with IBRRC

  • Increased awareness among participants


ad