the history of trips
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The History of TRIPS

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 9

The History of TRIPS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on

The History of TRIPS. Motivation. Paris Convention and PCT failed to provide American pharmaceutical companies patent protection in developing countries they considered adequate They sought firmer mandatory minima and guarantees of effective enforcement. The Failed WIPO Initiative.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The History of TRIPS' - emily


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
motivation
Motivation
  • Paris Convention and PCT failed to provide American pharmaceutical companies patent protection in developing countries they considered adequate
  • They sought firmer mandatory minima and guarantees of effective enforcement
the failed wipo initiative
The Failed WIPO Initiative
  • Late 1970s: U.S. pharmas and USPTO representatives asked WIPO to organize a diplomatic conference to revise Paris Convention
  • WIPO Director General refused
    • Developing countries opposed
    • One-country, one-vote principle made the initiative hopeless
slide4
GATT
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
  • 1950s: major trading nations achieve significant tariff reductions through bilateral negotiations, universalized by MFN principle
  • “Kennedy Round” (1960s): linear-cut strategy
    • Participating countries agree to initial major tariff reduction, then negotiate over exceptions
  • “Tokyo Round” (1970s): reduction of “non-tariff barriers” to trade through “linkage”:
    • Burdensome customs procedures
    • Import-licensing schemes
    • Export subsidies
emergence of the gatt strategy
Emergence of the “GATT Strategy”
  • Leadership assumed by Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and Negotiation (ACTPN)
    • Formed in 1979 to provide advice to U.S. President on trade
    • Chaired by CEOS of Pfizer and IBM
  • ACTPN persuades USTR to include IP in next round of GATT negotiations
    • Harmonized higher levels of protection
    • Guaranteed protection for software
    • “take it or leave it” principle
recruiting allies
Recruiting Allies
  • Film, Music, Book producers
    • Generally satisfied with Berne Convention
    • Preferred tried-and-true §301 strategy to unpredictable trade negotiations
      • Under 1974 Trade Act, supplemented by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, USTR identifies countries that fail to provide adequate protection for IPRs – and, if necessary, imposes trade sanctions
    • Dragged reluctantly into process by USTR
  • European & Japanese pharmaceutical and computer firms
    • Recruited by American counterparts
    • Common interest in higher levels of protection
getting opponents to the table
Getting Opponents to the Table
  • Virtually all developing countries resist
    • Group of Ten (in GATT): Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Egypt, India, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, Tanzania, Yugoslavia
  • USTR initiates §301 procedures against Brazil and South Korea
    • Makes clear that it will do the same with other countries unless they agree to include IP in trade negotiations
  • 1986: all agree
negotiations 1986 1994
Negotiations, 1986-1994
  • Developing Countries continue to resist on types of IP covered, subject matter, etc.
  • 1988: “Basic Framework of GATT Provisions on Intellectual Property, Statement of Views of the European, Japanese and United States Business Communities”
    • Concessions (suggested by Europeans): MFN principle; offers of technical assistance to developing countries; implementation delays
  • 1989: Abortive Vanderbilt Conference
    • Reichman fair-use proposal
  • 1990: “Draft Composite Text,” prepared by GATT Secretarist, incorporated into:
  • 1991 “Dunkel Draft,” prepared by GATT Director General
  • 1992-1993 Negotiations finally produced agreement on Uruguay Round package
trips tradeoff
TRIPS Tradeoff
  • Developing countries accept TRIPS obligations
  • Developing countries receive in return:
    • Liberalized trade in textiles and agricultural products;
    • Hope of relief from §301 actions;
    • Some leeway in permissible exceptions to higher IP standards
ad