Policing football fans in europe case studies of the euro 2000 and euro 2004 football championships
Download
1 / 32

Policing Football Fans in Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 445 Views
  • Uploaded on

Policing Football Fans in Europe Case studies of the Euro 2000 and Euro 2004 football championships Prof. Dr. Otto M.J. Adang http://policestudies.homestead.com Adang (1990): Study into initiation and escalation of riots In the Netherlands and during Euro ‘88 (Germany)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Policing Football Fans in Europe' - emily


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Policing football fans in europe case studies of the euro 2000 and euro 2004 football championships l.jpg

Policing Football Fans in EuropeCase studies of the Euro 2000 and Euro 2004 football championships

Prof. Dr. Otto M.J. Adang

http://policestudies.homestead.com


Adang 1990 study into initiation and escalation of riots l.jpg
Adang (1990): Study into initiation and escalation of riots

  • In the Netherlands and during Euro ‘88 (Germany)

  • Systematic and structured observations

  • Over 700 observation hours (around 71 football matches and 139 protest events)

  • Quantitative analysis


Ethological observations l.jpg
Ethological observations

  • Direct recording of observations

  • Limited number of well-defined behavioural categories

  • Focus on interaction

  • Focal group

  • Comparative approach


Research questions l.jpg
Research questions

  • What happens: who uses violence, how many, what type of violence, against whom, under what circumstances, what response?

  • What factors influence the initiation and escalation of violence?


Main conclusions l.jpg
Main conclusions

  • initiation of violence:

    • “frictions”

    • “young male syndrome”

  • escalation of violence:

    • ingroup/ outgroup mechanisms

    • opportunity/ perception of risk

  • normal social mechanisms are operating, but influence of alcohol and drugs


Police can do a lot to prevent violence but little to stop it l.jpg
Police can do a lot to prevent violence, but little to stop it

  • need to differentiate

  • need to communicate

  • need to observe

  • need for focused, timely interventions


Slide7 l.jpg

A “test”: it

Adang & Cuvelier, 2001


Slide8 l.jpg

Amsterdam it

Arnhem

Rotterdam

Eindhoven

Brugge

Brussel

Luik

Charleroi


Stated policy police tactics l.jpg
Stated policy: police tactics it

  • non-confrontational: preventive rather than repressive

  • small units, easily approachable, actively contacting fans

  • early and focused interventions

  • riot squads out of sight


Stated policy police behavioural profile l.jpg
Stated policy: police behavioural profile it

  • Police officers:

    • are service oriented, respectful of other cultures/ nationalities and unbiased

    • are aware of the importance of information

    • act within policy, without prejudice

    • act justly and strictly in a friendly and firm way


Data collection l.jpg
Data collection it

  • International monitoring team (all host cities)

    • questionnaire (individually)

    • summary of team observations

  • Foreign spotters’ teams

    • questionnaire (individually)

    • exit interview with teams

  • Observation team in each host city

    • systematic observations

    • qualitative diaries


Results two clusters differing especially in l.jpg
Results: two clusters, itdiffering especially in:

  • primarily fullfilled preventive role

  • treated visitors as guests

  • were easily approachable by fans

  • switched flexibly

  • clearly stated limits of tolerance


Public order management during euro 2004 explicit choice for low profile approach l.jpg

Public order management during Euro 2004: explicit choice for low profile approach

Adang & Stott


Data collection euro 2004 l.jpg
Data collection Euro 2004 for low profile approach

  • Matches of England, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal [and Albufeira]

  • Interviews with police and fans

  • International monitoring team

  • Observation teams (4 * 4)

    • in host cities: match days and preceding night

    • samples every 15 min, in between qualitative


Slide17 l.jpg

7 matches increased risk: 997 samples (England, Germany) for low profile approach

7 matches normal risk: 899 samples (Netherlands, Portugal)

Albufeira


Slide27 l.jpg
Note for low profile approach

  • Extensive use of plainclothes officers

  • Intervention units out of sight but close

  • Observations of potential incidents

  • Presence of “hooligans”


Conclusions l.jpg
Conclusions for low profile approach

  • Police strategy and tactics (low profile approach) succesful and contributed to:

    • Development of common football/ “euro 2004” identity

    • Empowerment of non-violence (self-policing among fans)

  • Contribution of international police cooperation

    • banning orders

    • community policing approach to international cooperation


International police cooperation differences in approaches l.jpg

CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE/ INVESTIGATION APPROACH for low profile approach

Focus on deterrence and punishment

Covert (no interaction with fans)

Indirectly influencing fan behaviour

Focus on individuals/ prominents

COMMUNITY POLICING APPROACH

Focus on public order management

Open (interaction with fans)

Directly influencing fan behaviour

Focus on behaviour

International police cooperation: differences in approaches


Foreign police at work braga l.jpg
Foreign police at work (Braga) for low profile approach


Strategic principles l.jpg
Strategic principles for low profile approach

  • “balance” between risk and deployment

  • dynamic assessment of risk

  • proactive communication

  • facilitation within limits

  • differentiation


Trends in public order policing l.jpg
Trends in public order policing for low profile approach

  • from riot control to public order management

  • increased international cooperation

  • more knowledge-based

    • more systematic evaluations

    • search for good practice (what works)

    • practice and training more informed by more practically useful research


ad