EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EMGT 501
Download
1 / 63

EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18 12-9 a. b. c. d. e. f. 12-18 a. b. e. Chapter 14 Decision Analysis Problem Formulation Decision Making without Probabilities Decision Making with Probabilities Risk Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentationdownload

EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

EMGT 501

HW Solutions

Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9

Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18


Slide2 l.jpg

12-9

a.

b.

c.

d.


Slide3 l.jpg

e.

f.


Slide4 l.jpg

12-18

a.

b.


Slide5 l.jpg

e.


Chapter 14 decision analysis l.jpg

Chapter 14Decision Analysis

  • Problem Formulation

  • Decision Making without Probabilities

  • Decision Making with Probabilities

  • Risk Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis

  • Decision Analysis with Sample Information

  • Computing Branch Probabilities


Problem formulation l.jpg

Problem Formulation

  • A decision problem is characterized by decision alternatives, states of nature, and resulting payoffs.

  • The decision alternatives are the different possible strategies the decision maker can employ.

  • The states of nature refer to future events, not under the control of the decision maker, which may occur. States of nature should be defined so that they are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.


Influence diagrams l.jpg

Influence Diagrams

  • An influence diagram is a graphical device showing the relationships among the decisions, the chance events, and the consequences.

  • Squares or rectangles depict decision nodes.

  • Circles or ovals depict chance nodes.

  • Diamonds depict consequence nodes.

  • Lines or arcs connecting the nodes show the direction of influence.


Payoff tables l.jpg

Payoff Tables

  • The consequence resulting from a specific combination of a decision alternative and a state of nature is a payoff.

  • A table showing payoffs for all combinations of decision alternatives and states of nature is a payoff table.

  • Payoffs can be expressed in terms of profit, cost, time, distance or any other appropriate measure.


Decision trees l.jpg

Decision Trees

  • A decision tree is a chronological representation of the decision problem.

  • Each decision tree has two types of nodes; round nodes correspond to the states of nature while square nodes correspond to the decision alternatives.


Slide11 l.jpg

The branches leaving each round node represent the different states of nature while the branches leaving each square node represent the different decision alternatives.

At the end of each limb of a tree are the payoffs attained from the series of branches making up that limb.


Decision making without probabilities l.jpg

Decision Making without Probabilities

  • Three commonly used criteria for decision making when probability information regarding the likelihood of the states of nature is unavailable are:

    • the optimistic approach

    • the conservative approach

    • the minimax regret approach.


Optimistic approach l.jpg

Optimistic Approach

  • The optimistic approach would be used by an optimistic decision maker.

  • The decision with the largest possible payoff is chosen.

  • If the payoff table was in terms of costs, the decision with the lowest cost would be chosen.


Conservative approach l.jpg

Conservative Approach

  • The conservative approach would be used by a conservative decision maker.

  • For each decision the minimum payoff is listed and then the decision corresponding to the maximum of these minimum payoffs is selected. (Hence, the minimum possible payoff is maximized.)

  • If the payoff was in terms of costs, the maximum costs would be determined for each decision and then the decision corresponding to the minimum of these maximum costs is selected. (Hence, the maximum possible cost is minimized.)


Minimax regret approach l.jpg

Minimax Regret Approach

  • The minimax regret approach requires the construction of a regret table or an opportunity loss table.

  • This is done by calculating for each state of nature the difference between each payoff and the largest payoff for that state of nature.

  • Then, using this regret table, the maximum regret for each possible decision is listed.

  • The decision chosen is the one corresponding to the minimum of the maximum regrets.


Example l.jpg

Example

Consider the following problem with three decision alternatives and three states of nature with the following payoff table representing profits:

States of Nature

s1s2s3

d1 4 4 -2

Decisionsd2 0 3 -1

d3 1 5 -3


Example optimistic approach l.jpg

Example: Optimistic Approach

An optimistic decision maker would use the optimistic (maximax) approach. We choose the decision that has the largest single value in the payoff table.

Maximum

DecisionPayoff

d1 4

d2 3

d3 5

Maximaxdecision

Maximax

payoff


Example optimistic approach18 l.jpg

Example: Optimistic Approach

  • Formula Spreadsheet


Example optimistic approach19 l.jpg

Example: Optimistic Approach

  • Solution Spreadsheet


Example conservative approach l.jpg

Example: Conservative Approach

A conservative decision maker would use the conservative (maximin) approach. List the minimum payoff for each decision. Choose the decision with the maximum of these minimum payoffs.

Minimum

DecisionPayoff

d1 -2

d2 -1

d3 -3

Maximin

decision

Maximin

payoff


Example conservative approach21 l.jpg

Example: Conservative Approach

  • Formula Spreadsheet


Example conservative approach22 l.jpg

Example: Conservative Approach

  • Solution Spreadsheet


Example minimax regret approach l.jpg

Example: Minimax Regret Approach

For the minimax regret approach, first compute a regret table by subtracting each payoff in a column from the largest payoff in that column. In this example, in the first column subtract 4, 0, and 1 from 4; etc. The resulting regret table is:

s1s2s3

d1 0 1 1

d2 4 2 0

d3 3 0 2


Example minimax regret approach24 l.jpg

Example: Minimax Regret Approach

For each decision list the maximum regret. Choose the decision with the minimum of these values.

Maximum

DecisionRegret

d1 1

d2 4

d3 3

Minimax

decision

Minimax

regret


Example minimax regret approach25 l.jpg

Example: Minimax Regret Approach

  • Formula Spreadsheet


Example minimax regret approach26 l.jpg

Example: Minimax Regret Approach

  • Solution Spreadsheet


Decision making with probabilities l.jpg

Decision Making with Probabilities

  • Expected Value Approach

    • If probabilistic information regarding the states of nature is available, one may use the expected value (EV) approach.

    • Here the expected return for each decision is calculated by summing the products of the payoff under each state of nature and the probability of the respective state of nature occurring.

    • The decision yielding the best expected return is chosen.


Expected value of a decision alternative l.jpg

Expected Value of a Decision Alternative

  • The expected value of a decision alternative is the sum of weighted payoffs for the decision alternative.

  • The expected value (EV) of decision alternative di is defined as:

    where: N = the number of states of nature

    P(sj ) = the probability of state of nature sj

    Vij = the payoff corresponding to decision alternative di and state of nature sj


Example burger prince l.jpg

Example: Burger Prince

Burger Prince Restaurant is considering opening a new restaurant on Main Street. It has three

different models, each with a different

seating capacity. Burger Prince

estimates that the average number of

customers per hour will be 80, 100, or

120. The payoff table for the three

models is on the next slide.


Payoff table l.jpg

Payoff Table

Average Number of Customers Per Hour

s1 = 80 s2 = 100 s3 = 120

Model A $10,000 $15,000 $14,000

Model B $ 8,000 $18,000 $12,000

Model C $ 6,000 $16,000 $21,000


Expected value approach l.jpg

Expected Value Approach

Calculate the expected value for each decision. The decision tree on the next slide can assist in this calculation. Here d1, d2, d3 represent the decision alternatives of models A, B, C, and s1, s2, s3 represent the states of nature of 80, 100, and 120.


Decision tree l.jpg

Decision Tree

Payoffs

.4

s1

10,000

s2

.2

2

15,000

s3

.4

d1

14,000

.4

s1

8,000

d2

1

.2

3

s2

18,000

s3

d3

.4

12,000

.4

s1

6,000

4

s2

.2

16,000

s3

.4

21,000


Slide33 l.jpg

Expected Value for Each Decision

Choose the model with largest EV, Model C.

EMV = .4(10,000) + .2(15,000) + .4(14,000)

= $12,600

d1

2

Model A

EMV = .4(8,000) + .2(18,000) + .4(12,000)

= $11,600

d2

Model B

1

3

d3

EMV = .4(6,000) + .2(16,000) + .4(21,000)

= $14,000

Model C

4


Expected value approach34 l.jpg

Expected Value Approach

  • Formula Spreadsheet


Expected value approach35 l.jpg

Expected Value Approach

  • Solution Spreadsheet


Expected value of perfect information l.jpg

Expected Value of Perfect Information

  • Frequently information is available which can improve the probability estimates for the states of nature.

  • The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is the increase in the expected profit that would result if one knew with certainty which state of nature would occur.

  • The EVPI provides an upper bound on the expected value of any sample or survey information.


Expected value of perfect information37 l.jpg

Expected Value of Perfect Information

  • EVPI Calculation

    • Step 1:

      Determine the optimal return corresponding to each state of nature.

    • Step 2:

      Compute the expected value of these optimal returns.

    • Step 3:

      Subtract the EV of the optimal decision from the amount determined in step (2).


Expected value of perfect information38 l.jpg

Expected Value of Perfect Information

Calculate the expected value for the optimum payoff for each state of nature and subtract the EV of the optimal decision.

EVPI= .4(10,000) + .2(18,000) + .4(21,000) - 14,000 = $2,000


Expected value of perfect information39 l.jpg

Expected Value of Perfect Information

  • Spreadsheet


Risk analysis l.jpg

Risk Analysis

  • Risk analysis helps the decision maker recognize the difference between:

    • the expected value of a decision alternative, and

    • the payoff that might actually occur

  • The risk profile for a decision alternative shows the possible payoffs for the decision alternative along with their associated probabilities.


Risk profile l.jpg

Risk Profile

  • Model C Decision Alternative

.50

.40

.30

Probability

.20

.10

5 10 15 20 25

Profit ($thousands)


Sensitivity analysis l.jpg

Sensitivity Analysis

  • Sensitivity analysis can be used to determine how changes to the following inputs affect the recommended decision alternative:

    • probabilities for the states of nature

    • values of the payoffs

  • If a small change in the value of one of the inputs causes a change in the recommended decision alternative, extra effort and care should be taken in estimating the input value.


Bayes theorem and posterior probabilities l.jpg

Bayes’ Theorem and Posterior Probabilities

  • Knowledge of sample (survey) information can be used to revise the probability estimates for the states of nature.

  • Prior to obtaining this information, the probability estimates for the states of nature are called prior probabilities.

  • With knowledge of conditional probabilities for the outcomes or indicators of the sample or survey information, these prior probabilities can be revised by employing Bayes' Theorem.

  • The outcomes of this analysis are called posterior probabilities or branch probabilities for decision trees.


Computing branch probabilities l.jpg

Computing Branch Probabilities

  • Branch (Posterior) Probabilities Calculation

    • Step 1:

      For each state of nature, multiply the prior probability by its conditional probability for the indicator -- this gives the joint probabilities for the states and indicator.


Slide45 l.jpg

Computing Branch Probabilities

  • Branch (Posterior) Probabilities Calculation

    • Step 2:

    • Sum these joint probabilities over all states -- this gives the marginal probability for the indicator.

    • Step 3:

    • For each state, divide its joint probability by the marginal probability for the indicator -- this gives the posterior probability distribution.


Expected value of sample information l.jpg

Expected Value of Sample Information

  • The expected value of sample information (EVSI) is the additional expected profit possible through knowledge of the sample or survey information.


Expected value of sample information47 l.jpg

Expected Value of Sample Information

  • EVSI Calculation

    • Step 1:

      Determine the optimal decision and its expected return for the possible outcomes of the sample using the posterior probabilities for the states of nature.

    • Step 2:

      Compute the expected value of these optimal returns.

    • Step 3:

      Subtract the EV of the optimal decision obtained without using the sample information from the amount determined in step (2).


Efficiency of sample information l.jpg

Efficiency of Sample Information

  • Efficiency of sample information is the ratio of EVSI to EVPI.

  • As the EVPI provides an upper bound for the EVSI, efficiency is always a number between 0 and 1.


Sample information l.jpg

Sample Information

Burger Prince must decide whether or not to purchase a marketing survey from Stanton Marketing for $1,000. The results of the survey are "favorable" or "unfavorable". The conditional probabilities are:

P(favorable | 80 customers per hour) = .2

P(favorable | 100 customers per hour) = .5

P(favorable | 120 customers per hour) = .9

Should Burger Prince have the survey performed by Stanton Marketing?


Influence diagram l.jpg

Influence Diagram

Decision

Chance

Consequence

Avg. Number

of Customers

Per Hour

Market

Survey

Results

Market

Survey

Restaurant

Size

Profit


Posterior probabilities l.jpg

Posterior Probabilities

Favorable

StatePriorConditionalJointPosterior

80 .4 .2 .08 .148

100 .2 .5 .10 .185

120 .4 .9 .36.667

Total .54 1.000

P(favorable) = .54


Posterior probabilities52 l.jpg

Posterior Probabilities

Unfavorable

StatePriorConditionalJointPosterior

80 .4 .8 .32 .696

100 .2 .5 .10 .217

120 .4 .1 .04.087

Total .46 1.000

P(unfavorable) = .46


Posterior probabilities53 l.jpg

Posterior Probabilities

  • Formula Spreadsheet


Posterior probabilities54 l.jpg

Posterior Probabilities

  • Solution Spreadsheet


Decision tree55 l.jpg

Decision Tree

  • Top Half

s1 (.148)

$10,000

s2 (.185)

4

$15,000

d1

s3 (.667)

$14,000

s1 (.148)

$8,000

d2

s2 (.185)

5

2

$18,000

s3 (.667)

I1

(.54)

$12,000

d3

s1 (.148)

$6,000

s2 (.185)

6

$16,000

s3 (.667)

1

$21,000


Decision tree56 l.jpg

Decision Tree

  • Bottom Half

1

s1 (.696)

$10,000

I2

(.46)

s2 (.217)

7

$15,000

d1

s3 (.087)

$14,000

s1 (.696)

$8,000

d2

s2 (.217)

8

3

$18,000

s3 (.087)

$12,000

d3

s1 (.696)

$6,000

s2 (.217)

9

$16,000

s3 (.087)

$21,000


Decision tree57 l.jpg

Decision Tree

  • EMV = .148(10,000) + .185(15,000)

    • + .667(14,000) = $13,593

d1

4

  • $17,855

d2

  • EMV = .148 (8,000) + .185(18,000)

    • + .667(12,000) = $12,518

5

2

I1

(.54)

d3

  • EMV = .148(6,000) + .185(16,000)

    • +.667(21,000) = $17,855

6

1

  • EMV = .696(10,000) + .217(15,000)

    • +.087(14,000)= $11,433

7

d1

I2

(.46)

d2

  • EMV = .696(8,000) + .217(18,000)

    • + .087(12,000) = $10,554

8

3

d3

  • $11,433

  • EMV = .696(6,000) + .217(16,000)

    • +.087(21,000) = $9,475

9


Expected value of sample information58 l.jpg

Expected Value of Sample Information

If the outcome of the survey is "favorable”,

choose Model C. If it is “unfavorable”, choose Model A.

EVSI = .54($17,855) + .46($11,433) - $14,000 = $900.88

Since this is less than the cost of the survey, the survey should not be purchased.


Efficiency of sample information59 l.jpg

Efficiency of Sample Information

The efficiency of the survey:

EVSI/EVPI = ($900.88)/($2000) = .4504


Slide60 l.jpg

Bayes’ Decision Rule:

Using the best available estimates of the probabilities of the respective states of nature (currently the prior probabilities), calculate the expected value of the payoff for each of the possible actions. Choose the action with the maximum expected payoff.


Slide61 l.jpg

Bayes’ theory

Si: State of Nature (i = 1 ~ n)

P(Si): Prior Probability

Ij: Professional Information (Experiment)( j = 1 ~ n)

P(Ij | Si): Conditional Probability

P(Ij Si) = P(Si Ij): Joint Probability

P(Si | Ij): Posterior Probability

P(Si | Ij)


Slide62 l.jpg

Home Work

14-20

Due Day: Nov 7


End of chapter 14 l.jpg

End of Chapter 14


ad
  • Login