1 / 73

Computer-Mediated Communication

Computer-Mediated Communication. Intimate Relationships. Romantic love —  a timeless tradition?. Mediated meeting. http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/08/boy-girl-computer/.

emilia
Download Presentation

Computer-Mediated Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer-Mediated Communication Intimate Relationships

  2. Romantic love —  a timeless tradition? Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  3. Mediated meeting Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  4. http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/08/boy-girl-computer/ Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  5. Thousands of boys and girls who’ve never met plan weekends together, for now that punch-card dating’s here, can flings be far behind? And oh, it’s so right, baby. The Great God Computer has sent the word. Fate. Destiny. Go-go-go. online — Look Magazine, February 1966http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/08/boy-girl-computer/ Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  6. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  7. Pew online dating survey (2006) 63m know someone who has used a dating site 16m have used a dating site themselves 53m know someone who has gone on a date 7m have gone on a date themselves 29% of online adults think online daters desperate (but only 20% of those single and looking) 64% of online dating users think the large pool helps people find a better date 47% of all online adults concur Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  8. Social shaping of technology designers designers designers Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  9. Online dating: The basics Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  10. Fixed choice Photo Fixed choice Free text Fixed choice Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  11. Online dating profiles • Combination of categorical descriptors, free text self-description, and photos • Highly optimized self-presentations • Carefully selected detail • Unlimited time to craft • Exaggerations? Lies? • A lot of people lie a little (Hancock et al. 2007) • Do they reflect actual self? Ideal self? Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  12. Searching Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  13. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  14. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  15. Matching Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  16. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  17. Conceptual lensesCMCMate selectionSearching/MatchingSocial networks Marriage markets Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  18. ? Individuals Dyads Populations Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  19. Mate selection: Two perspectives Evolutionary psychology Assortative mating Claims we partner with people like us (homophily). Evident with regard to: Physical attractiveness, socioeconomic status, race, adult attachment style, personality traits, among others. Yet sometimes it’s more complicated than just similarity. • Claims we seek and offer traits associated with reproductive success, so: • Women seek men with resources, signaled by age, wealth, education, height, etc. • Men seek women with fertility, signaled by youth, facial symmetry, muscle tone, etc. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  20. 7 10 9 2 3 5 5 7 6 5 8 6 8 6 2 4 8 3 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  21. 10 6 7 9 5 2 3 6 7 5 2 5 4 8 8 3 6 8 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  22. 7 seeks 10 for an awkward time “Marriage markets” — differential exchange Some points to ponder: • Why wouldn’t a 7 want a 10? • What stops us from trading up repeatedly? • Opportunity cost of staying with current mate? Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  23. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  24. The tyranny of choice, or:Gourmet jam is not a date Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  25. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  26. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore (Gupta & Singh 1982)

  27. The process of online dating Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  28. Pieces of profiles:What predicts attractiveness? Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  29. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  30. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  31. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  32. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  33. Photo × Text attractiveness Women’s profiles Men’s profiles Photo high Photo med Photo low Text low Text low Text high Text high Text med Text med Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  34. Strategic vs. authentic vs. aspirationalself-presentation Anticipated future interaction? Actual self vs. ideal self? “Balancing accuracy and desirability” Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  35. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  36. Participants from Ellison et al. • “In their profile they write about their dreams as if they are reality.” • “I’ve never known so many incredibly athletic women in my life!” • “I checked my profile and I had lied a little bit about the pounds, so I thought I had better start losing some weight so that it would be more honest.” Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  37. Forming impressions in online dating • “Cognitive misers”: Making the most of limited cues • Social Information Processing (Walther) • Reciprocal re-use of whatthey notice in others Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  38. Most people are not startlingly beautiful or magically attractive. But someone who seems just moderately nice — to most people — can flower under the imaginative attention of a lover’s eye. Not … because the lover is somehow gilding the other with fictitious charms; but because the kind of attention the lover brings allows less obvious qualities to be seen and appreciated. — Armstrong (2002) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  39. Deception? (Hancock et al. 2007) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  40. Deception? (Hancock et al. 2007) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  41. Deception? (Hancock et al. 2007) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  42. Honestly…(?) • And yet: in Gibbs et al. (2006), 94% said they had not intentionally misrepresented themselves. • 87%: Doing so is not acceptable. • Still, they feel others are misrepresenting. • Why? Ellison et al. (2006) —Foggy mirrors, avoiding natural boundaries, portraying ideal selves… Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  43. Is it deception? Or is it… • Misperception of self (foggy mirror) • Different readings of ambiguous labels • Self-enhancement (no intent to deceive) • Ideal self rather than actual self • Circumvention of technological constraints Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  44. The peril (and promise) of ambiguity (“everything looks perfectfrom far away…”) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  45. Virtue in vagueness: Norah Jones The persona in her songs — let’s not call it Ms. Jones herself, because her life couldn't be this dull — might have lived practically anywhere in the developed world, at any time during the last century. Somehow Ms. Jones’s work has managed to make a virtue of vagueness. — The New York Times, Feb. 8, 2004, via Norton, Frost, & Ariely (2007) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  46. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  47. ? I really like good music. I really like Billy Joel. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  48. Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2007) • People think more knowledge = more liking • Actually, more traits = less liking • Similarity mediates the relationship in (2) • Dissimilarity cascades • Moving from the lab to real dates: Knowledge, liking, similarity before and after Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  49. Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2007) • People think more knowledge = more liking • Actually, more traits = less liking • Similarity mediates the relationship in (2) • Dissimilarity cascades • Moving from the lab to real dates: Knowledge, liking, similarity before and after Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  50. Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2007) • People think more knowledge = more liking • Actually, more traits = less liking • Similarity mediates the relationship in (2) • Dissimilarity cascades • Moving from the lab to real dates: Knowledge, liking, similarity before and after Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

More Related