Rare event simulation splitting for variance reduction l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 24

Rare-Event Simulation Splitting for Variance Reduction PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Rare-Event Simulation Splitting for Variance Reduction. IE 680, Spring 2007 Bryan Pearce. What is a Rare Event?. B. A. Ω. Formal Problem Definition. Splitting: the beginning. Importance function h Measures “how close” a state is to the rare event

Download Presentation

Rare-Event Simulation Splitting for Variance Reduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Rare event simulation splitting for variance reduction l.jpg

Rare-Event SimulationSplitting for Variance Reduction

IE 680, Spring 2007

Bryan Pearce

What is a rare event l.jpg

What is a Rare Event?




Formal problem definition l.jpg

Formal Problem Definition

Splitting the beginning l.jpg

Splitting: the beginning

  • Importance function h

    • Measures “how close” a state is to the rare event

  • Divide the intermediary state space into m ‘levels’ according to the thresholds l0, l1, …, lm

Slide5 l.jpg

h(x) = l0

= l1

= l2

= l3

= lm = l

More formally l.jpg

More formally:

How to choose h l.jpg

How to choose h?

  • Defining the importance function can be difficult.

  • Ideally our h should reflect:

    • The most likely path to the rare event

    • pk(x) = pk (indep. of state)

    • pk = p (indep. of level)

  • Presumes apriori knowledge of the system.

First sub interval l.jpg

First sub-interval

MC Sim N0 independent chains. R0 reach l1.





Second sub interval splitting l.jpg

Second sub-interval: Splitting

MC Sim N1 chains, splitting from the previously achieved threshold states.

R1 reach l2.



…and so on for each sub-interval




Notation l.jpg


Splitting policy fixed splitting l.jpg

Splitting policy – fixed splitting

  • Each chain that reaches level k is cloned ck times.

  • Nk will be random for each level k > 0

  • Stratified sampling from the entrance distribution of level k

Splitting policy fixed effort l.jpg

Splitting policy – fixed effort

  • Fix Nk in advance. Choose the states represented in the entrance distribution by:

    Random assignment

    • Choose these Nk states randomly from the entrance distribution

      Fixed assignment

    • Choose an equal quantity of each state

    • Better stratification

Pros cons of splitting method l.jpg

Pros & cons of splitting method

  • Fixed splitting –

    • Asymptotically more efficient under optimal conditions

    • Efficiency very sensitive to splitting factor ck

  • Fixed effort

    • Higher memory requirement

    • More robust

Efficiency l.jpg


Our hope is that splitting will allow our variance to shrink faster than our computational time grows. This has indeed been shown to be true in many cases.

Truncation motivation l.jpg

Truncation - Motivation

Simulation time spent reaching l1







Simple biased truncation l.jpg

Simple (biased) Truncation

Choose β:

  • If a chain falls below the level lk-β then terminate.

  • Estimator becomes biased, moreso with small β.

  • Large β does not reduce workload very much.


Slide17 l.jpg








β = 2


Unbiased truncation l.jpg

Unbiased Truncation

Use the ‘Russian Roulette’ principle:

The first time a chain ‘down-crosses’ a level threshold it dies with probability (1 – 1/rk,j). If it survives then its weight is increased by a factor of rk,j.

(these rk,j are user-defined and determine the ‘strength’ of the truncation)

How to choose the r k j s l.jpg

How to choose the rk,js

  • The selection of the rk,js at each level of the process will control the aggressiveness of the truncation policy.

  • A tried-and-true value:

Slide20 l.jpg







Dies with prob. (1 – 1/r3,2)

Weight increases by a factor of r3,2 if the chain survives.

Russian roulette cont l.jpg

Russian Roulette, cont.

  • There are various methods by which to use the chain weights can compensate for this truncation bias.

    • Probabilistic

    • Tag-based

    • Periodic

Truncation w o weights l.jpg

Truncation w/o weights

  • Chain weighting truncation methods can inflate the variance of our gamma estimator.

  • We can avoid this problem by allowing our chains to probabilistically re-split upon re-achieving previously achieved goals.

Conclusions and notes l.jpg

Conclusions and notes

  • Potential performance

    • With γ = 10-20,

      Var[MC] = 10-23 while Var[split] = 10-41

  • Poorly-behaved systems

    • Inefficient to apply

References l.jpg


L’Ecuyer, P., V. Demers, B. Tuffin. 2006. Splitting for rare-event simulation.

Glasserman, P., P. Heidelberger,and T. Zajic. 1998. A large deviations perspective on the efficiency of multilevel splitting.

L’Ecuyer, P., V. Demers, B. Tuffin. 2006. Rare-events, splitting, and quasi-Monte Carlo.

Garvels, M. J. J. 2000. The splitting method in rare event simulation.

  • Login