1 / 63

Stay Out of Jail: Immigration Compliance Issues for Employers

Stay Out of Jail: Immigration Compliance Issues for Employers. Glen M. Krebs Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP 250 West Main Street, Suite 1600 Lexington, KY 40507 859/288-7409 or gkrebs@wyattfirm.com. Stay Out of Jail. I-9 Compliance. Stay Out of Jail. I-9 Compliance

elysia
Download Presentation

Stay Out of Jail: Immigration Compliance Issues for Employers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stay Out of Jail: Immigration Compliance Issues for Employers Glen M. Krebs Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP 250 West Main Street, Suite 1600 Lexington, KY 40507 859/288-7409 or gkrebs@wyattfirm.com

  2. Stay Out of Jail • I-9 Compliance

  3. Stay Out of Jail • I-9 Compliance • SSN Mismatch (No-Match Letters)

  4. Stay Out of Jail • I-9 Compliance • SSN Mismatch (No-Match Letters) • E-Verify

  5. Stay Out of Jail • I-9 Compliance • SSN Mismatch (No-Match Letters) • E-Verify • Undocumented or improperly documented workers – Employer Sanctions

  6. Stay Out of Jail • I-9 Compliance • SSN Mismatch (No-Match Letters) • E-Verify • Undocumented or improperly documented workers – Employer Sanctions • ICE Raids

  7. I-9 Compliance • Section 1 completed at time of hire

  8. I-9 Compliance • Section 1 completed at time of hire • Verification docs provided w/in 3 days

  9. I-9 Compliance • Section 1 completed at time of hire • Verification docs provided w/in 3 days • Evidence of current work authorization placed in reverification tickler system

  10. I-9 Compliance • Section 1 completed by employee at time of hire • Verification docs provided w/in 3 days • Evidence of current work authorization placed in reverification tickler system • Section 2 completed by employer w/in 3 days of hire

  11. I-9 Compliance • Do not require specific documents or more than the law requires

  12. I-9 Compliance • Do not require specific documents or more than the law requires • Retain forms for the appropriate time – later of: 3 yrs from date of hire or one year after termination

  13. I-9 Compliance • Do not require specific documents or more than the law requires • Retain forms for the appropriate time – later of: 3 yrs from date of hire or one year after termination • Use an adequate tickler system to reverify expiring work authorizations

  14. Internal I-9 Audit • Prepare list of employees hired after Nov. 6, 1986

  15. Internal I-9 Audit • Prepare list of employees hired after Nov. 6, 1986 • Separate out I-9 forms which no longer need to be maintained

  16. Internal I-9 Audit • Prepare list of employees hired after Nov. 6, 1986 • Separate out I-9 forms which no longer need to be maintained • Assure that each employee has a form I-9

  17. Internal I-9 Audit • Prepare list of employees hired after Nov. 6, 1986 • Separate out I-9 forms which no longer need to be maintained • Assure that each employee has a form I-9 • Review I-9 for completeness and technical mistakes and make proper corrections

  18. Internal I-9 Audit • If necessary, request appropriate documentation or reverify employability

  19. Internal I-9 Audit • If necessary, request appropriate documentation or reverify employability • Recommend suspension for employee if verification or reverification cannot be completed in a reasonable time

  20. Internal I-9 Audit • If necessary, request appropriate documentation or reverify employability • Recommend suspension for employee if verification or reverification cannot be completed in a reasonable time • Prepare a file memo detailing results of audit and recommendations

  21. Origin of No-Match • In 1994 Social Security Administration begins to issue letters to Employer notifying that name and SSN do not match

  22. Origin of No-Match • In 1994 Social Security Administration begins to issue letters to Employer notifying that name and SSN do not match • Employer has no “affirmative duty” to re-verify Employee’s work authorization

  23. Origin of No-Match • In 1994 Social Security Administration begins to issue letters to Employer notifying that name and SSN do not match • Employer has no “affirmative duty” to re-verify Employee’s work authorization • Knowingly employing undocumented workers vs. discrimination based on race or citizenship

  24. DHS New Regulation • August 15, 2007 • Upon receipt of no-match letter, Employer must check its records and correct if necessary

  25. DHS New Regulation • Upon receipt of no-match letter, Employer must check its records and correct if necessary • Or, Employer must request the Employee to confirm the name and SSN • if incorrect Employer must make changes

  26. DHS New Regulation • Upon receipt of no-match letter, Employer must check its records and correct if necessary • Or, Employer must request the Employee to confirm the name and SSN • if incorrect Employer must make changes • if correct, Employer must advise Employee to resolve discrepancy within 90 days of receipt of no-match letter

  27. DHS New Regulation • If Employee cannot resolve the discrepancy within 90 days the Employer must • Re-verify the I-9 form within 93 days of receipt of no-match letter

  28. DHS New Regulation • If Employee cannot resolve the discrepancy within 90 days the Employer must • Re-verify the I-9 form within 93 days of receipt of no-match letter • Employer may not accept any document which contains the old SSN

  29. DHS New Regulation • If Employee cannot resolve the discrepancy within 90 days the Employer must • Re-verify the I-9 form within 93 days of receipt of no-match letter • Employer may not accept any document which contains the old SSN • Employee’s identity must be confirmed by document containing a photo

  30. DHS New Regulation • Compliance with these procedures will provide a “Safe Harbor” for Employers – they will NOT be deemed to have constructive knowledge that their Employees are undocumented

  31. California District Court Enjoins Implementation – Oct. 10, 2007 • The court found that the American Federation of Labor, et. al. had demonstrated serious questions as to three of their challenges to the rule and therefore issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the implementation of the new regulation.

  32. California District Court Enjoins Implementation – Oct. 10, 2007 • The court found that the American Federation of Labor, et. al. had demonstrated serious questions as to three of their challenges to the rule and therefore issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the implementation of the new regulation • SSA decided not to issue any no-match letters until litigation is resolved

  33. DHS Supplemental Final RuleOctober 28, 2008 • DHS’s consistent, if informal, view of SSA no-match letters has been that

  34. DHS Supplemental Final RuleOctober 28, 2008 • DHS’s consistent, if informal, view of SSA no-match letters has been that • SSA no match letters do not, by themselves, establish that an Employee is unauthorized

  35. DHS Supplemental Final RuleOctober 28, 2008 • DHS’s consistent, if informal, view of SSA no-match letters has been that • SSA no match letters do not, by themselves, establish that an Employee is unauthorized • There are both innocent and non-innocent reasons for no-match letters, but

  36. DHS Supplemental Final RuleOctober 28, 2008 • DHS’s consistent, if informal, view of SSA no-match letters has been that • SSA no match letters do not, by themselves, establish that an Employee is unauthorized • There are both innocent and non-innocent reasons for no-match letters, but • An Employer may not safely ignore SSA no-match letters, and

  37. DHS Supplemental Final RuleOctober 28, 2008 • DHS’s consistent, if informal, view of SSA no-match letters has been that • SSA no match letters do not, by themselves, establish that an Employee is unauthorized • There are both innocent and non-innocent reasons for no-match letters, but • An Employer may not safely ignore SSA no-match letters, and • An Employer must be aware of and comply with the anti-discrimination provisions of INA

  38. WHAT NEXT ?? • Nobody knows

  39. WHAT NEXT ?? • Nobody knows • Prudent course of action is to implement actions described in the New Regulation

  40. WHAT NEXT ?? • Nobody knows • Prudent course of action is to implement actions described in the New Regulation • But that is not necessary until the District Court’s injunction is lifted

  41. E-Verify • Best means available for employers to verify electronically the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees

  42. E-Verify • Best means available for employers to verify electronically the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees • Does not verify immigration status

  43. E-Verify • Best means available for employers to verify electronically the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees • Does not verify immigration status • Does not protect against workplace enforcement, but does presume that employer did not knowingly hire unauthorized alien

  44. E-Verify • You can opt in or opt out at any time – the program is voluntary except for certain employers such as federal contractors

  45. E-Verify • You can opt in or opt out at any time – the program is voluntary except for certain employers such as federal contractors • For more information: • www.dhs.gov/e-verify • 888-464-4218

  46. Enforcement • DHS – Secure Border Initiative (SBI)

  47. Enforcement • DHS – Secure Border Initiative (SBI) • Civil Penalties

  48. Enforcement • DHS – Secure Border Initiative (SBI) • Civil Penalties • Criminal Penalties

  49. Enforcement • DHS – Secure Border Initiative (SBI) • Civil Penalties • Criminal Penalties

  50. Secure Border Initiative • First Phase – Multi-year plan to secure America’s borders and reduce illegal migration. Unveiled in Nov. 2005 with increased emphasis on audits and administrative enforcement (Walmart case)

More Related