Outline

1. SBAS Implementation in theRegions of ACAC and ASECNAFP7-GALILEO-2008-4.3.1 / FP7-GALILEO-2008-4.3.4Project with Community research fundingWP2- Service Enablers Scenarios - ASECNAPrepared by Egis AviaPresented by Nga Bui (Egis Avia)

2. Outline • Proposed ASECNA implementation steps • Economical Enablers • Africa-EU cooperation • ASECNA objectives and strategy • Technical solution for EGNOS extension over ASECNA Region • System Funding & Owner • System Operator & Service Provider • Certification • Operations

3. Proposed ASECNA Implementation Steps Arica-EU cooperation Economical Enablers ASECNA Strategy Technical solution for EGNOS extension over ASECNA Region System Owner System Funding Can be coupled Contract System Operator(s) Service Provider(s) Certification Liability Working Agreements Operations

4. Economical Enablers Evidence of demand Cost allocation and cost recovery scheme SBAS applications CBA High operational interest: APV approaches available without any additional equipment on the airport Initiatives in the region? Depends on the technical solution In Europe, EC funds the service, free of charge for airspace users

5. International ACAC cooperation 3rd Africa-EU Summit • Tripoli, Lybia, 29-30 November 2010 • Adoption of the Second Action Plan (2011-2013) • 3rd Thematic Partnership on Regional Economic Integration, Trade and Infrastructure • Priority n°2 : Support to Air Transport Sector and Satellite Navigation • Political impulse: • To expedite cooperation on satellite navigation • To undertake the first steps towards the provision of SBAS services in Africa • ASECNA formally identified as a key actor

6. ASECNA objectives and strategy ASECNA Objectives • Institutional / Governance • Management of AFI SBAS programme • Independent provision of SBAS services over its area of responsibility • Oversight of SBAS services provision in the AFI region Operational: To reach APV-I and then LPV 200 level of performance based on the implementation of EGNOS by 2015/2016 ASECNA Strategy • Approach • Step by step • Short and measurable steps • Pragmatism • Seeking for “quick wins”

7. ASECNA objectives and strategy ASECNA Strategy (Approach and Landing) • Medium term – 2020 onwards • Objective: • To offer full APV I/LPV 200 certified service • Entire ASECNA area • Maximised APV I/LPV 200 availability • Principles: • Independent SBAS possibly mixed with partial EGNOS v3 extension • Maximum AFI infrastructure • ASECNA and other African stakeholders to provide services • Short term – 2015/16 • Objective: • To offer minimal APV certified service • Limited ASECNA area (northern area) • Limited APV-I availability • Principles: • Extension of EGNOS v2 • Minimum infrastructure • European system to provide services

8. Technical solution for EGNOS extension over ASECNA Region Phased technical solutions for EGNOS extension over ASECNA Region Short/ Medium term To extend current European EGNOS service to the region with minimum added infrastructure Long term Independent SBAS possibly mixed with partial EGNOS v3 extension, with maximum AFI infrastructure Medium term To implement Regional Extension Module 8

9. Focus on short term technical solution • APV-I availability in December 2011 with current EGNOS system configuration

10. Focus on short term technical solution Current possible coverage area Short term possible coverage area based on homogeneous extension (10°) Madagascar is not taken into account in the short and medium term because it is considered too far geographically Medium Term Additional infrastruture + ionospheric assessment

11. Focus on medium term technical solution REM Concept Overview • The Regional Extension Module (REM) is the solution for the integration, monitoring and control of the additional RIMS deployed for the extension. • REM : • Is linked to EGNOS core system (Europe) • Is based on additional RIMS covering a service area outside ECAC • Provides a level of monitoring and control to the Region • Is able to be isolated from European network and processing European Processing Area REM 1 REM 2 REM 3

12. Focus on medium term technical solution • Proposed architecture (based on previous study) REM 1 Iono corrections

13. System Funding & Owner Short term Medium term Schedule Long term + + RIMS extension (MEDA) Homogeneous extension (10°) Technical solution Independent SBAS Additional infra + Iono assessment + EGNOS V3 Current EGNOS System (V2.2) ASECNA (except Madagascar) Northern ASECNA ARG-1 region Coverage area Europe (ECAC) Africa • 4 scenarios: • States • ASECNA • EC • Mixed funding • 4 scenarios: • States • ASECNA • EC • Mixed funding System funding MEDA program African Stakeholders? (States, ANSPs…?) European Commission European Commission ? ? Operationfunding European Commission Regional Stakeholders? European Commission Regional Stakeholders? European Commission Regional Stakeholders? System owner

14. System Operator & Service Provider Long term Short term Medium term Schedule + + RIMS extension (MEDA) Homogeneous extension (10°) Technical solution Independent SBAS Current EGNOS System (V2.2) Additional infra + Iono assessment + EGNOS V3 ? System operator Regional EGNOS Operator AFI EGNOS Operator TBD ESSP (SOU) Cooperation Cooperation First step Second step System service provider ESSP (SPU) Regional EGNOS Service Provider AFI EGNOS Service Provider TBD Transfer

15. System Operator & Service Provider • The Regional EGNOS Operator should be in charge of: • Regional infrastructure (RIMS, network, control center) • Managing regional sites hosting the infrastructures and associated logistics aspects • Some maintenance activities • First line maintenance and troubleshooting activities • Planned maintenance activities • Regional system performance monitoring • The Regional EGNOS Service Provider should be in charge of: • Relationship with regional users • NOTAM generation • Regional end user performance monitoring

16. CertificationReminder of the European Model Audits to maintain certificate NSA NSA ESSP ESSP certified as ANSP Certificate EC Mutual recognition (SES) ESSP EC, ICAO Industry NSA ↔ NSA EC, ICAO ANSP NSA EASA ICAO, RTCA EASA

17. Certification • System  ICAO and SES • Service Provider  SES • Application  ICAO and SES • Airworthiness  EASA • System and application certification can rely on ICAO  Applicable to ASECNA • Airworthiness: • Based on each State regulations? • Based on new common regulations (associated entity to be defined – UEMOA, CEMAC, CAFAC, other)? • Based on other regulations (Europe, US, . JAR, EASA standards transposition)

18. Certification • In case of a regional operator and service provider: • Will it be certified? • Based on which regulations? • ASECNA could be in charge of deployment of regulation applicable to each member state • AAMACs • Role is to establish and maintain uniform regional safety acceptable • Could endorse the role of aviation safety agency as well as Regional Supervisory Authority Short term Medium term Long term Schedule Regional EGNOS Service Provider ARG-3 SBAS Service Provider System service provider ESSP (SPU) Transfer To be defined at ACAC level To be defined at ACAC level Recognition by States out of ECAC Certification French NSA

19. Operations • Each ANSP in ACAC will be in charge of • Procedure availability (from design to publication) • Training (ATC) • Procedures (ATC) • Validation and broadcast of NOTAM for APV EGNOS operations • NOTAM generation to be clarified (Part of Phase B ESA Study): • Upgrade of ESSP tool? • Development of a new tool dedicated to the region? • If a dedicated tool is developed for ACAC region, who will operate it? • ASECNA? • Regional Service Provider?

20. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION QUESTIONS?