1 / 13

10 Globalization and ‘localization’ and the environment

10 Globalization and ‘localization’ and the environment. Globalization, pollution havens and endogenous environmental regulation Interactions of trade reforms and domestic policies: decentralization and sub-national governments. Globalization & growth: three observations.

elu
Download Presentation

10 Globalization and ‘localization’ and the environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 875-9.ppt 10 Globalization and ‘localization’ and the environment • Globalization, pollution havens and endogenous environmental regulation • Interactions of trade reforms and domestic policies: decentralization and sub-national governments

  2. 875-9.ppt Globalization & growth: three observations • Globalization  removal of impediments to trade & factor flows in presence of other distortions • Other policies and institutions; market failures • Hence ambiguity of welfare effects • Increasing incomes may generate ‘technique effects’ in general • Although no strong evidence for forests, NR • But rising incomes also generate demands for ag. protectionism (Anderson and Hayami 1986) • Which effect will dominate?

  3. 875-9.ppt Trade policy reform and the environment • Env’l effects of trade liberalization • Pollution haven hypothesis • Factor endowments hypothesis • (Antweiler et al 2001) • Country-specific reforms and outcomes (e.g. OEE Chapters 6, 7, 8) • Outcomes depend on nature of reforms • And on endowments, institutions, laws & regulations

  4. 875-9.ppt International capital flows • K inflows (outflows) affect resource endowments • Rybczinski stories about aggregate endowments and structure of production; • Many FDI flows are sector-specific or have specific-characteristics (embedded knowledge, global market links, etc) • Sector-specific rates of return on capital depend on many factors: • Rel. commodity prices (--> trade & domestic price policies) • Laws, regulations, externalities (e.g.: Indonesian forest fires and oil palm expansion)

  5. 875-9.ppt Globalization affects amenity values • Changing structure of trade and production alters opportunity costs • Cp. spatial expansion of the market • Tourism/ecotourism development as an example? • Local expression of a global technique effect? • Related: debt-for-nature swaps, private-public partnerships in resource acquisition and land retirement

  6. 875-9.ppt International agreements on trade and envn’t • WTO • Permits LDCs to maintain agricultural & natural resource protectionism (national & sectoral asymmetry) • Tension between WTO trading rules and environmental concerns (dolphin-tuna conflict) • Interactions of WTO rules and domestic policies are potentially important for sectoral and environmental outcomes (e.g. W. Martin 2001; Huang, Rozelle and Zhang 2000) • WTO article XVII limits state trading, reduces ‘airlock’ between domestic and int’l markets • But confers latitude in tariff rate quotas • Cp. state marketing bodies in SS Africa

  7. 875-9.ppt ‘Localization’, growth, policy & environment • Setting: powers of subnational governments • Restraints on trade, local taxation and provision of public goods; environmental regulations • Some LDCs have always had meaningful federal systems (China, Brazil, India) • In others, decentralization is accelerating • De jure: Philippines, Indonesia, Bolivia, Mali, … (WDR 2001) • De facto: Indonesia, China … How do center-local tensions affect env. outcomes of growth & trade?

  8. 875-9.ppt Standard literature on local governance • Theory: decentralization theorem (Oates 1972) • Gov’t functions should be devolved to the lowest level of administration at which externalities are internalized • Extensions and additions (e.g. Tiebout) • Applications: externalities and interjurisdictional competition for jobs & investment -- a race to the bottom? (Oates and Schwab, J. Pub. Econ 1988; A. Levinson, JEEM 1997)

  9. 875-9.ppt LDC cases: tensions between national and local objectives • E.g. China • Ownership: common assets, no conservation incentives • Price ‘scissors’: undervaluation & inefficient use of natural resource assets e.g. land • Initially, national self-sufficiency in grains; ‘degenerated’ into regional self-sufficiency (Lin 1998) • Overproduction in deficit areas unsuitable for grain prod’n • H’hold responsibility system & subsequent reforms address some issues • E.g. incentives to maintain & improve irrigation systems • But provincial self-suff. remains, is sanctioned (Young 2000)

  10. 875-9.ppt Practical challenges of decentralization • Asymmetric distribution of information and enforcement costs • OSFA versus local environmental policies (e.g. watershed management)

  11. 875-9.ppt •x(c1, d1) •z(c2, d1) •y(c1, d2) ci = unit abatement cost of sector i. dj = transmission parameter at distance j from receptor site

  12. 875-9.ppt Spatial & sectoral costs • Framing least-cost policies requires both sectoral and spatial knowledge and policy tools • If a single agency’s control area doesn’t extend to both, it cannot implement a least-cost policy • Environmental and resources policies are among most obvious sources of policy failure • When growth or trade --> changes in economic conditions, optimal control areas may also change, requiring institutional innovations or legal reforms • E.g. design of land use regulations in livestock/pastoral systems (Perrings 1987)

  13. 875-9.ppt References (not in OEE) K. Anderson and Y.Hayami (1986): The Political Economy of Agricultural Protectionism: East Asia in International Perspective (Sydney: Allen & Unwin) W. Martin (2001): State trading and China’s agricultural import policies. Can. J. Agr. Econ 49 Huang, J.; S. Rozelle, L. Zhang (2000): WTO and agriculture: radical reforms or continuation of gradual transition? China Econ. Rev. 11. World Bank (2001): World Development Report (Washington DC: OUP) (re: decentralization)

More Related