Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 55

PET AND PET/CT IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 250 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

PET AND PET/CT IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE. Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, M.D., Ph.D. Chief, Nuclear Medicine Assistant Professor of Radiology. Agenda. Myocardial perfusion imaging SPECT Perfusion PET Metabolic PET (Viability) Hybrid Imaging (PET/CT).

Download Presentation

PET AND PET/CT IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

PET AND PET/CT IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, M.D., Ph.D.

Chief, Nuclear Medicine

Assistant Professor of Radiology


Agenda

Agenda

  • Myocardial perfusion imaging

    SPECT

    Perfusion PET

  • Metabolic PET (Viability)

  • Hybrid Imaging (PET/CT)


Myocardial perfusion imaging spect

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingSPECT

  • Indications

    • Detects presence/location/extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with R/O ACS.

    • Risk stratification after ACS.

    • Identify fixed defects, evaluate EF and viability.

    • CP with abnormal EKG’s.

    • Equivocal ETT.

    • Inability to exercise (pharmacological stress).


Spect radiotracers

SPECT Radiotracers

  • Isotopes

    • Thallium-201 or Technetium-99m compounds.

    • Both assess LV function and ischemia

  • Isotopes taken up by viable myocardial cells in quantities proportional to perfusion.

  • Well perfused regions appear brighter.


  • Myocardial perfusion imaging exercise spect

    Myocardial Perfusion ImagingExercise SPECT


    Stress protocols

    Stress Protocols

    • Exercise

      • Pt walks on treadmill with increasing speed/incline.

      • Goal = increase myocardial oxygen demand (MVO2)

        • CAD: the increased demand exceeds supply = ischemia

      • Advantages: flexible protocols.

      • Disadvantages: pt must be able to achieve 85% of maximal HR.

  • Pharmacologic

    • dobutamine = increases HR, BP, contractility; mimics exercise.

    • Coronary vasodilators – dipyridamole and adenosine.

      • Flow mismatch; diseased dilated arteries get less flow

  • Sensitivities and specificities comparable to exercise stress.


  • Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

    • Strengths

    • Extensively validated, useful for cost-effective risk stratification & patient management.

    • Widely available – outpatient settings.

    • Standardized protocols.

    • Excellent procedural and clinical utilization guidelines published by professional medical societies.

    • 27 accepted clinical indications.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Relationship between Extent of Ischemia and Cardiac Events

    60

    40

    Cardiac Event Rate (%)

    20

    0

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Reversible Defects (Number)

    Ladenheim Ml et al. J Am CollCardiol. 1986;7:464.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    6

    5

    *

    Medical Rx

    4

    log Hazard Ratio

    3

    *

    Revasc

    2

    1

    0

    0

    12.5%

    25%

    32.5%

    50%

    % Total Myocardium Ischemic SPECT

    Magnitude of Jeopardized Myocardium

    *P < 0.001

    Hachamovitch R et al. Circulation. 2003;107:2900-2907.


    Why pet perfusion

    Why PET Perfusion?

    • Obesity and poor quality studies, SPECT.

      • Dosing

      • Attenuation correction

  • Image clarity.

  • Improved diagnostic accuracy, lower false positive.

  • Identification of multivessel ischemia.

  • Rapid acquisition: impaired patients.

  • Lower radiation burden.


  • Spect vs pet perfusion

    Energy: 78-140 KeV

    Attenuation correction: sometimes

    Stress: exercise, pharmacologic

    Protocol, start to finish: 2–2/12 hours

    Ventricular function: post-stress, rest

    511 KeV

    Attenuation correction: always

    Stress: pharmacologic, exercise in future (F-18)

    Protocol, start to finish:30–45 minutes

    Ventricular function: stress, rest

    SPECT vs PET Perfusion

    SPECT PET


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Myocardial Perfusion PET in Patients with a Non-Diagnostic SPECT

    2% (5 pts!!) Non-Diagnostic

    233 consecutive pts with a nondiagnostic SPECT followed by MP PET <90 days

    Abnormal

    25%

    Normal

    73%

    64% were women

    Mean BMI 32

    Mean age 62 yrs

           Bateman. Circ 2003;108:IV-454.


    Prevalence of artifacts pet vs spect

    Prevalence of Artifacts: PET vs SPECT

    Bateman TM et al. J NuclCardiol. 2006;13(1):24-33.


    Radiation exposure msv pet vs spect

    Radiation Exposure (mSv) PET vs SPECT


    Perfusion pet advantages

    Perfusion PET Advantages

    • High spatial and temporal resolution.

    • Excellent sensitivity.

    • Accurate depth-independent attenuation correction.

    • High contrast resolution.

    • Quantitative imaging capabilities.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Myocardial Blood Flow and

    Radiotracer Uptake


    Pet cardiac radiotracers

    PET Cardiac Radiotracers


    Pet perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia

    PET Perfusion for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Freedom From Any Cardiac Events Following Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET

    Yoshinaga K et al. J Am CollCardiol. 2006;48:1029.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Characteristics of a Normal Myocardial Perfusion PET Study

    • Uniform distribution of tracer, independent of gender

    • LV cavity at peak stress equal to/smaller than at rest

    • Uniform and normal wall thickness and thickening

    • Uniform and normal regional wall motion

    • Peak stress LVEF > rest LVEF


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Characteristics of an Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion PET Study

    • Decrease in regional tracer uptake at peak stress

    • LV cavity at peak stress larger than at rest

    • Frequent regional contraction abnormality (stunning) at peak stress

    • Peak stress LVEF < rest LVEF


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Abnormal N-13 perfusion study

    72 year old man with peripheral vascular disease.

    Coronary arteriography:

    •LAD: 60% ostial and 80% mid vessel stenoses

    •LCX: 90% proximal stenosis and occluded OM

    •RCA: 90% ostialstenosis


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    • Multivessel Disease

    • Ischemia + Transient Dilatation


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    PET Perfusion/Metabolic Imaging Protocols

    13N-ammonia

    82Rb

    13N-ammonia

    82Rb

    18F-FDG

    Transm.

    Rest

    Exercise

    Pharm.

    Stress

    Metabolic

    Imaging

    Dipyridamole

    Adenosine

    Dobutamine


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow

    Rest

    LAO

    Stress

    RAO


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Arterial Tracer Input Function and Changes in

    Myocardial Tracer Concentration

    5

    4

    3

    Activity

    Concentration

    (cts / pixel / sec)

    Myocardium

    2

    1

    Arterial Blood

    0

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Time (sec)


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Clinical Value Long Term Known

    MBF in Kawasaki Disease

    p = 0.01

    500

    400

    300

    Myocardial Blood Flow

    (ml/100g/min)

    200

    100

    0

    Rest

    Adenosine

    Rest

    Adenosine

    Control

    n = 10

    Kawasaki

    n = 10

    Muzik et al, J ACC Vol 28; 3:757-62, 1996


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Clinical Value Long Term Known

    Therapy MBF Changes in Insulin Resistance

    RPP

    MBF

    P <0.05

    P <0.05

    NS

    SD

    Percent Increase

    Baseline

    On Treat

    Off Treat

    Baseline

    On Treat

    Off Treat

    Quinones et al, Ann Int Med 2004:140:700-708


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Long Term Prognostic Value PET Perfusion

    Added Value of Coronary Flow Reserve

    Herzog et al. JACC 2009;54:150-156.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Clinical Role of Quantitative PET

    Conditions which cannot be evaluated by "relative" imaging modalities

    • Extent and significance of multivessel disease

    • Pharmacologic therapy and life style modifications

    • Detection of preclinical and early CAD

    • Microvascular disease (endothelial disfunction)

    • Evaluation of procedural outcome (PTCA)

    • Hemodynamic significance of CAD (coronary steal syndrome, collaterals)

    • Myocardial regeneration

    • Ventricular remodeling (the discussion of which would require two more hours)

    Limitations of quantitative PET

    • Unpredictable hyperemic response (what is "normal"?)

    • Computational demands


    Why is pet more suitable to follow pro regression of cad

    Why Is PET More Suitable to Follow Pro/Regression of CAD

    • Coronary blood flow is a function of the arterial radius raised to the fourth power

    • Small changes in diameter not measurable by anatomic imaging are magnified into much larger changes in blood flow that are readily quantifiable by PET

    • Changes in PET perfusion can be seen in 40–90 days after intense risk factor treatment is begun

    Gould KL. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:625-638.


    Viability pet study chronic lvef dysfunction

    HO

    HO

    OH

    HO

    18F

    Viability PET StudyChronic LVEF Dysfunction

    • Traditionally the gold standard

    • Two sets of resting images to detect viable and hibernating myocardium:

      • Perfusion image (usually with N-13 ammonia or rubidium-82)

      • Glucose metabolic image (with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose = FDG)

    Cellular membrance integrity

    Glucose metabolism


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    FDG

    FDG

    FDG-6-P

    FDG

    FDG

    FDG

    FDG

    FDG

    FDG

    FFA

    FFA

    FDG

    FDG

    FFA

    FFA

    FDG

    FDG

    FFA

    FFA

    FDG

    FDG

    FFA

    FFA

    FDG

    FDG

    FFA

    FFA

    FFA

    FFA

    FFA

    FFA

    D-Glucose

    Myocyte FDG Uptake

    Normal MyocyteIschemic Myocyte

    Glucose 6-phosphatase

    Glucose 6-phosphatase

    X

    X

    FDG-6-P

    Glycolytic Pathway

    Glycolytic Pathway

    Hexokinase

    Hexokinase

    FFA

    G6P

    D-Glucose

    D-Glucose

    D-Glucose

    G6P

    Glucose 6-phosphatase

    Glucose 6-phosphatase


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    PET Myocardial Viability

    NH3

    FDG

    Stress

    Rest

    Fixed

    Match

    Fixed

    Mismatch

    Partially Reversible

    Match

    Partially Reversible

    Mismatch


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    r=0.87,

    SEE=10.8

    P<0.001

    18%

    Extent mismatch (%LV)

    PET Viability

    Improved symptoms of CHF

    Improvement

    (%)

    Multivessel CAD

    Mean LVEF = 28±6%

    Di Carli M et al, Circulation 1995;92:3436-44.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    80

    80

    60

    60

    40

    40

    20

    20

    0

    0

    -20

    -20

    -40

    -40

    -60

    PET vsDobutamine Echo

    Improved Exercise Tolerance

    Delta METS (%)

    r=0.54

    P=0.0001

    r=0.005

    P=0.92

    PET viable (%)

    DE viable (%)

    Multivessel CAD, mean LVEF = 277%59% NYHA III or IV

    Marwick T et al: J Am CollCardiol 33:750, 1999


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    The Next Thing is….

    Tracking of Genetically Labeled Progenitor Cells by PET

    Beeres, S. L.M.A. et al. J Am CollCardiol 2007;49:1137-1148


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Hybrid PET/CTA: Myocardial Perfusion and Function

    Concurrent Rest & Peak Stress Function

    Coronary Calcium Assessment

    Cardiac Perfusion

    CTA


    Progression of atherosclerosis

    PET

    Endothelial dysfunction

    Severe ischemia

    SPECT

    Progression of Atherosclerosis

    CT Coronary angiography

    Adapted from Abrams J. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2524-2533.


    Why now

    Why Now?

    • Availability of PET cameras: oncology

    • Availability of Radiopharmaceutical

    • Improvement in acquisition protocols

    • Improvement in cardiac processing

    • Ability to do ECG-gated imaging

    • Improvement in cardiac display


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    PET/CT scan protocol

    • Corrections:

    • scatter

    • attenuation

    Spiral CT

    (1-8 min total)

    Fused PET/CT

    CT

    PET

    CT

    PET

    Whole-body PET

    (6-40 min total)

    • Reconstruction:

    • FORE + OSEM

    CT

    PET


    Spect underestimates disease burden stable cad

    Calcium score: 890

    SPECT Underestimates Disease Burden: Stable CAD


    Why use pet cta

    Why use PET/CTA ?

    • Non invasive.

    • Offer high diagnostic accuracy.

    • Monitor the course of disease.

    • Allow quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary reserve.

    • Able to detect early functional abnormalities.

    • Able to monitor consequences of lifestyle modifications.


    Rest stress pet rubidium 82 and cta protocol

    0:00 min

    0:30 min

    Rest-Stress PET Rubidium-82 and CTA Protocol


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Effective Radiation Dose for Cardiac PET/CT Studies


    Relationship of stress induced ischemia and atherosclerosis cac

    Distribution of the normal MPS studies (N=1,119)

    Distribution of the ischemic MPS studies (N=76)

    CAC score

    0

    5%

    22%

    4 %

    1-9

    0 %

    10-99

    18 %

    7 %

    100-399

    20 %

    25 %

    400-999

    20 %

    29 %

    1000

    11 %

    39 %

    Relationship of Stress-Induced Ischemia and Atherosclerosis (CAC)

    Berman DS et al. J Am CollCardiol. 2004;44:923-930.


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Prognosis of Cardiac Events by PET-CT

    Added Value of CAC

    Schenker, M. P. et al. Circulation 2008;117:1693-1700


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    • Hybrid PET/CTA: Myocardial Perfusion and Function

    Kajander, S. et al. Circulation 2010;122:603-613


    Pet and cta complement each other

    PET and CTA Complement Each Other

    • Calcium (blooming)

    • Stents

    • Limited spatial resolution, <1.5-mm vessels

    • Overestimation of stenosis

    • Positive predictive value MDCT ~50%

    • Clinical outcomes data

    • Preclinical disease

    Abnormal CT Angiography: Limited Positive Predictive Value


    Discordance between noninvasively determined anatomic and functional measures of atherosclerosis

    Discordance Between Noninvasively Determined Anatomic and Functional Measures of Atherosclerosis

    • Percent stenosis a moderate descriptor of coronary resistance

      • Stenosis difficult to estimate with soft plaque

    • Coronary vasodilator reserve integrates coronary epicardial and microvascular function

    • Balanced ischemia (MPI)

    • Artifacts (MPI)

    • Noncoronary causes of myocardial damage


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Scenarios in Cardiac PET/CT imaging for

    (suspected) Coronary Artery Disease


    Pet and pet ct in ischemic heart disease

    Infarct size measurement

    Lautamaki, R. et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:299-305


    Changes coming with hybrid imaging nuclear cardiology evolution

    Changes Coming With Hybrid ImagingNuclear Cardiology Evolution

    • PET-CT:

      Comprehensive evaluation of CAD

      Perfusion

      Function

      Viability

      Vulnerable Plaque Assessment (FDG ?)


    Take home message

    Take Home Message

    • Information derived from CT and PET is complementary for the evaluation of CAD.

    • Promising new 18F-labelled myocardial perfusion tracers are under development and will likely increase use cardiac PET as a routine diagnostic tool.

    • Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET has contributed to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of CAD. It characterizes patients without evidence of regional, visually detectable perfusion heterogeneity.

    • The potential of PET to introduce tracers targeting biologic and molecular mechanisms relevant to cardiac disease and therapy is basically unlimited. PET has the potential to take a central role as a diagnostic tool in personalised, molecular cardiovascular medicine of the future.


  • Login