1 / 18

ITIS 5160

ITIS 5160. Indexing. Indexing datacubes. Objective: speed queries up. Traditional databases (OLTP): B-Trees Time and space logarithmic to the amount of indexed keys. Dynamic, stable and exhibit good performance under updates. (But OLAP is not about updates….) Bitmaps :

elockhart
Download Presentation

ITIS 5160

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ITIS 5160 Indexing

  2. Indexing datacubes • Objective: speed queries up. • Traditional databases (OLTP): B-Trees • Time and space logarithmic to the amount of indexed keys. • Dynamic, stable and exhibit good performance under updates. (But OLAP is not about updates….) • Bitmaps: • Space efficient • Difficult to update (but we don’t care in DW). • Can effectively prune searches before looking at data.

  3. R = (…., A,….., M) R (A) B8 B7 B6B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 B0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bitmaps

  4. Query optimization Consider a high-selectivity-factor query with predicates on two attributes. Query optimizer: builds plans (P1) Full relation scan (filter as you go). (P2) Index scan on the predicate with lower selectivity factor, followed by temporary relation scan, to filter out non-qualifying tuples, using the other predicate. (Works well if data is clustered on the first index key). (P3) Index scan for each predicate (separately), followed by merge of RID.

  5. Index Pred1 Index Pred2 Blocks of data (P2) (P3) t1 tn t1 tn Tuple list1 Tuple list2 Pred. 2 Merged list answer Query optimization (continued)

  6. Query optimization (continued) When using bitmap indexes (P3) can be an easy winner! CPU operations in bitmaps (AND, OR, XOR, etc.) are more efficient than regular RID merges: just apply the binary operations to the bitmaps (In B-trees, you would have to scan the two lists and select tuples in both -- merge operation--) Of course, you can build B-trees on the compound key, but we would need one for every compound predicate (exponential number of trees…).

  7. Bitmap for a1 Bitmap for b2 Bitmap for a1 and b2 Bitmaps and predicates A = a1 AND B = b2 = AND

  8. Tradeoffs Dimension cardinality small dense bitmaps Dimension cardinality large sparse bitmaps Compression (decompression)

  9. Star-Joins Select F.S, D1.A1, D2.A2, …. Dn.An from F,D1,D2,Dn where F.A1 = D1.A1 F.A2 = D2.A2 … F.An = Dn.An and D1.B1 = ‘c1’ D2.B2 = ‘p2’ …. Likely strategy: For each Di find suitable values of Ai such that Di.Bi = ‘xi’ (unless you have a bitmap index for Bi). Use bitmap index on Ai’ values to form a bitmap for related rows of F (OR-ing the bitmaps). At this stage, you have n such bitmaps, the result can be found AND-ing them.

  10. R = (…., A,….., M) value-list index R (A) B8 B7 B6B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 B0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bitmaps

  11. sequence <3,3> value-list index (equality) R (A) B22B12B02 B21 B11 B01 3 (1x3+0) 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 Example

  12. Encoding scheme Equality encoding: all bits to 0 except the one that corresponds to the value Range Encoding: the vi rightmost bits to 0, the remaining to 1

  13. Range encodingsingle component, base-9 R (A) B8 B7 B6B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 B0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

  14. RangeEval Evaluates each range predicate by computing two bitmaps: BEQ bitmap and either BGT or BLT RangeEval-Opt uses only <= A < v is the same as A <= v-1 A > v is the same as Not( A <= v) A >= v is the same as Not (A <= v-1)

  15. sequence <3,3> value-list index(Equality) R (A) B22B12B02 B21 B11 B01 3 (1x3+0) 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 Example (revisited)

  16. sequence <3,3> range-encoded index R (A) B12B02 B11 B01 3 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 Example

  17. RangeEval-OPT

More Related