1 / 16

The evolution of peer review: e-developments

The evolution of peer review: e-developments. Tony Delamothe. EASE meeting 11 June 2003. Peer review. Current model Its contingency on paper How it’s changing. Peer review: current model.

elmo
Download Presentation

The evolution of peer review: e-developments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The evolution of peer review: e-developments Tony Delamothe EASE meeting 11 June 2003

  2. Peer review • Current model • Its contingency on paper • How it’s changing

  3. Peer review: current model post-publication peer review pre-publication peer review ms R R R

  4. How peer review is changing • Post-publication peer review • Pre-publication peer review • Introducing greater transparency • Changing the process • Abandoning the process

  5. Facilitating post-publication peer review pre-publication peer review post-publication peer review ms R R R

  6. Introducing greater transparency pre-publication peer review post-publication peer review ms R R R

  7. At the moment of publication….. post-publication peer review pre-publication peer review ms

  8. Introducing greater transparency (BMJ study) • Originally submitted manuscript • Peer review report(s) • Editorial committee’s deliberations • Statistician’s report • Authors’ covering letter with resubmitted manuscript [all signed]

  9. Changing the process: Med J Aus (1) pre-publication peer review ms

  10. Changing the process: Med J Aus (2), JIME pre-publication peer review ms

  11. Changing the process: ETAI, ACP pre-publication peer review ms

  12. Changing the process: the story so far • Low participation rates • Peer review still has a binary outcome – primacy of final publication remains

  13. Abandoning the process • arXiv • Cogprints (Institutional repositories/open archive movement)

  14. Resources (1) • Craig Bingham’s chapter in Peer Review in Health Sciences, BMJ Books: 1999 (new edition out later this year) • Gura T. Scientific publishing: Peer review, unmasked. Nature 2002;416:258-260 • Delamothe T, Smith R. Twenty thousand conversations. BMJ 2002;324:1171-2. • Bingham C and others. Med J Aust internet peer-review study. Lancet 1998: 352: 441-5

  15. Resources (2) • Med J Aus (second protocol) http://www.mja.com.au/public/information/iprs2bod.html • JIME (Journal of Interactive Media in Education) http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/about.html#lifecycle • ETAI (Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence) http://www.ida.liu.se/ext/etai/ • arXiv http://arXiv.org/blurb/pg02pr.html

  16. http://bmj.com/talks

More Related