1 / 11

P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot

P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot. Authors:. Date: 2010-09-14. Summary. The IEEE 802 EC granted conditional approval to P802.11REVmb to proceed to sponsor ballot at its July 2010 closing meeting.

elle
Download Presentation

P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot Authors: Date: 2010-09-14 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  2. Summary • The IEEE 802 EC granted conditional approval to P802.11REVmb to proceed to sponsor ballot at its July 2010 closing meeting. • WG 802.11 recirculation ballot on P802.11REVmb_D5.0 closed, meeting the terms of the conditional approval • Details of meeting these terms is shown on the next slide, and the status of the P802.11REVmb WG ballot are shown on the following slides. • WG 802.11 requests that the IEEE 802 EC approve the start of sponsor ballot on P802.11REVmb. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  3. Meeting the terms of conditional approval • As per LMSC OM Clause 14: • Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval. • The Ballot occurred, in accordance with the schedule presented to the EC in document 11-10/0801r02. • After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes. • The approval percentage is 92% • There are no new valid disapprove votes. • No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. • No technical changes were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. • No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters • There were 16 comments received, of which 7 were marked disapprove, from 3 voters. All three voters subsequently withdrew their disapprove comments. Two of the disapprove comments were received from a new no voter who changed his vote to approve on withdrawal of his comments. • So there are no new disapprove comments. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  4. Meeting the terms of conditional approval - continued • If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor. • None • The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. • The Ballot closed on 2010-8-19 • The comments associated with remaining disapproves and the WG responses are attached to slide 10 • As indicated above, one negative vote received in the recirculation was subsequently changed by the voter to approve coincident with withdrawal of all his disapprove comments from that recirculation. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  5. WG Letter Ballot Results * Includes one post-ballot change of vote D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  6. 802.11 WG Letter Ballot Comments D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  7. Unsatisfied comments by commenter As described previously, there are no unsatisfied comments from LB 167. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  8. Updates since ballot 167 • 3 Commenters have indicated that all their disapprove comments in LB167 are satisfied/resolved. • H. Ramamurthy: “I will like to withdraw CIDs 5008, and 5011. And I hereby change my vote on P802.11REVmb to approve.“ • L. Chu: ” I hereby withdraw my "part of a no vote" comments on LB167.“ • G. Vlantis: ”I would like to withdraw my two ‘part of a no vote’ comments from LB167mb.“ D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  9. September 2010 Mandatory Editorial Coordination • IEEE SA staff performed MEC on P802.11REVmb D5.0, and indicated one mandatory change to be made prior to Sponsor Ballot (see https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-1070-00-000m-revmb-mec-comments.doc ). • This change was deemed editorial by the WG chair, and IEEE staff liaison, and P802.11REVmb D6.0, which includes this change, will be submitted to Sponsor Ballot.

  10. Unsatisfied comments • The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved during working group ballot is attached. • Double click on the icon to the right to open this. • A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. • Double click on the icon to the right to open this. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

  11. Timeline D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)

More Related