1 / 17

自我介紹

自我介紹. 徐詩杰 嘉義 成大交管系 畢業 交大運管所 碩一 WOO LAB 排球 音樂. Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry. Moonkyu Lee and Lawrence F. Cunningham Transportation Quarterly Vol.50 No.2 Spring 1996 P.57-72 . 指導老師：任維廉 教授 報告人： 徐詩杰. O utline. Introduction The service Loyalty Framework

eljah
Download Presentation

自我介紹

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 自我介紹 • 徐詩杰 • 嘉義 • 成大交管系 畢業 • 交大運管所 碩一 • WOOLAB • 排球 音樂

  2. Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry Moonkyu Lee and Lawrence F. Cunningham Transportation Quarterly Vol.50 No.2 Spring 1996 P.57-72 指導老師：任維廉 教授 報告人：徐詩杰

  3. Outline • Introduction • The service Loyalty Framework • The Airline Industry Environment • Different perspectives and viewpoints of Customer Loyalty • Conclusions and Discussion

  4. Introduction • The airline industry was deregulated in 1978 • One strategy suggested for the survival and growth of service firms is to develop and maintain customer loyalty, or a long term relationship with their customers. • 41% cited a decline in the airline service quality, and 22% said they would change the airlines they patronized.

  5. The service Loyalty Framework • Service Quality • Economic Cost • Transaction Cost • Switching Cost

  6. The Airline Industry Environment • After deregulation in 1978 • Allow to set prices • Enter and exit the industry upon meeting insurance and safety requirement • Price cutting strategies • Lack of marketing sophistication • The recession of 1980’s • Service quality continued to deteriorate in the late 1980’s

  7. The Economist Approach • Jordan(1970) and Douglas and Miller(1974) • Flight frequency • Load factors • Transit time • Type of aircraft

  8. The Government Response to Airline Service Quality • Air Travel Consumer Report(1987-present) • Airline on-time performance and flight delays • Mishandle baggage • Overbooking • Consumer complaints • Weakness • Airline self-report bias • Only catch some passenger’s complaints

  9. The Consumer Researcher Perspective • Parasuraman, Berry, and Zeithaml(1987-present) • SERVQUAL • Quantitative method • Tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy • Weakness • More generic rather than industry-specific • Bitner, et al(1990) • CIT（critical incident technique） • Qualitative method • Response to “special needs” • Weakness • Data are hard to analyze • Categorizations are subjected to researchers’ bias

  10. The Industry Specialist • Kearney(1986) • basis of accessibility of delayed flight information • airlines’ response to delayed flights • attractiveness of lower fares to encourage flying during non-peak periods • Seat comfort • availability of pre-assigned seats and non-stop flights • Gourdin and Kloppenborg(1991) • convenient departure times • convenient arrival times • boarding security checks • Prompt meaningful flight information

  11. The Industry Specialist • Airline Quality Rating • 80 factors19 factors • Such as：on-time performance, number of accident, flight problem, delayed boarding, mishandled baggage, and etc. • Morash and Ozment(1994) • Airline core service flows • Airline peripheral service flows • Airline communication flows • Airline capacity utilization • Weakness • Factor is through experts opinion • The measures are used without rigorous evaluations of construct validity or statistical reliability • The approach does not take consumer expectations into account • It overlooks variables related to customers’ repeat patronage or switching behavior

  12. The Consulting Company Approach • Zagat(1993) • Use four quality variables to determine the service value • Comfort、service、 reliability/timeliness、food quality、and cost • J. D. Power and Associates(1993) • 40service variables from： • Preflight factors • Inflight factors • Post-flight factors • Weakness • Lack of cost factor • The problems are same as the Industry Specialist approach

  13. Conclusions • The research relevant to airline service quality and loyalty should identify and incorporate various cost measures • Airline service quality is a multifaceted phenomenon, so use multiple methods not a single party’s point-of-view • Need to develop theoretical taxonomies of airline service variables and purify the measures of service quality and loyalty. • Future research should employ the methodologies such as longitudinal approach that can capture the dynamic nature of service quality evaluations and loyalty formations • Airline service quality should be tracked over time

  14. Discussion • 研究服務品質的評估方法，除了考量主觀性的判斷指標外，客觀性或是具有理論分析的因素也要一併列入考量，才能使評估結果得到完整且客觀的分析，對於服務上品質與成本的拿捏，更需要依賴多元性的評估方法來維持一定顧客忠誠度。 • 除了持續發展適當的評估方法來衡量服務品質外，航空企業應將成本因素納入考量，並且對服務品質做動態的追蹤檢視，畢竟當期的服務將會影響消費者對下一期服務的預期，直到形成顧客忠誠度，消費者對服務品質的感覺和期望也會隨時間做動態變化，長期且密集的監視服務品質是維持顧客忠誠度的重要步驟。

  15. Thanks for listening : )

More Related