Data Analysis Document Status for LISA Pathfinder. N. Tateo 20/02/2007. Current status. The current status of document writing is consistent with the LTP Science Implementation Plan (SIP):. Time planning. The time planning is similarly consistent:. DA Requirement Document.
The current status of document writingis consistent with theLTP Science Implementation Plan (SIP):
The time planning is
The DA Requirement Document has been delivered (Iss.1.0).
Latest evolvement in DA, including consequences of previous meetings,can be implemented in a revised issue.
The DA Design Document,not issued yet, is ready and contains the S/W architecture as stated in the LTP SIP.
It’s a review of the DA topics discussed so far, plus the definition of science data channels to be analyzed.
While it contains a preliminary definition ofthe Quick-Look Analysis tool (QLA) andthe definition of the GUI to be implemented,
it’s still lacking the summary elements description,i.e. the concise and defined examination of algorithmsand functions to be enclosed into each package.
This part is now intended to be included in the“Software Requirement Document”.
In the latest meetings and following communications different documents were mentioned:
Given that the DA Architecture is already covered bythe DA Design Document, remains to be clarifiedthe content of the AD.
About the URD, the LISA Pathfinder Science Implementation Plan (LPF SIP) states:
Is there another URD?
It’s also stated that the Operations Scientist (ESA) willsupport the writing of Software Requirement Document:
Supporting who?The definition of the necessary tools to be developed,now intended to converge in the SRD,according to the LPF SIP should be issuedby the Project Scientist:
What kind of “inputs from the LTP PI Team”?
In the LPF SIP there is also:
What exactly are the “STOC Work Packages”?
The Implementation Plan (IP) should describe“how, by whom and when this S/W developmentis going to take place”.
Who’s responsible for its writing,and by when it’s intended to be delivered?