1 / 17

# Non-probability decision rules - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-probability decision rules. Dr. Yan Liu Department of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering Wright State University. Types of Decision Making Environment.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Non-probability decision rules' - elizabeth-mcguire

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Non-probability decision rules

Dr. Yan Liu

Department of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering

Wright State University

Decision maker knows with certainty the consequences of every alternative or decision choice (Non-probability decision making)

Decision maker can assign the probabilities of the various outcomes (decision making under risk)

Decision maker can neither predict nor describe the probabilities of the various outcomes (decision making under uncertainty)

2

Lexicographic Ordering

Satisficing

Maxmax Payoff

Maximin Payoff

Minimax Regret

Laplace

Hurwitz Principle

3

Transitivity

If alternative A is preferred to alternative B and alternative B is preferred to alternative C, then alternative A is preferred to alternative C

Column Linearity

The preference relation between two alternatives is unchanged if a constant is added to all entries of a column (value) of the decision table

The preference relation between two alternatives is unchanged if another alternative is added/deleted from the decision table

The preference relation between two alternatives is unchanged if a column with the same value in all alternatives is added/deleted to the decision table

4

V1≥V2≥ ∙∙∙≥Vn, n values are ordered in order of importance

Compare different decision alternatives on the most important value, and continue until one alternative is the best

C > A > B

Non-exhaustive comparisons and can be efficient when there are many values

5

Select any alternative which satisfies the minimum aspiration levels (the minimum acceptable criteria) of all values

May not be optimal because not all alternatives will be considered as long as one satisfactory alternative is found

6

Select the alternative which results in the maximum of maximum payoffs; an optimistic criterion

Payoff Table

Maximum Payoff

\$1,000

\$10,000

\$5,000

\$8,000

B > D > C > A

7

Maximum Payoff

\$10,000

\$10,000

\$9,000

\$8,000

A =B > C > D

Maximax payoff violatescolumn linearity

8

Maximum Payoff

\$8,000

\$10,000

\$8,000

\$8,000

B > A = C = D

Maximax payoff violatesaddition/deletion of identical columns

9

Select the alternative which results in the maximum of minimum payoffs; a pessimistic criterion

Payoff Table

Minimum Payoff

\$1,000

-\$7,000

\$0

-\$2,000

A > C > D > B

Maximin payoff violatescolumn linearity and addition/deletion of identical columns

10

Select the alternative which results in the minimum of maximum regret.

Regret is the difference between the maximum payoff possible for a specific outcome and the payoff actually obtained when a specific alternative is chosen and that outcome is encountered

Regret Table

Payoff Table

Maximum Regret

\$9,000

\$8,000

\$5,000

\$3,000

D > C > B > A

11

Payoff Table

Maximum Regret

\$9,000

\$11,000

\$5,000

\$6,000

\$11,000

C > D > A > B

Minmax regret violates addition/deletion of alternatives

12

Calculate the average of each alternative by assuming that the outcomes are equally likely to occur, and select the alternative with the largest average

Payoff Table

Average

\$1,000

\$1,166.7

\$1,933.3

\$2,233.3

13

Select the alternative that has the largest weighted average of its maximum and minimum payoffs; the weight of the maximum payoff is , referred to as the coefficient of optimism, and the weight of the minimum payoff is 1- 

• if =1, then Hurwicz criterion is the same as Maxmax payoff

• if =0, then Hurwicz criterion is the same as Maxmin payoff

Payoff Table

 =0.4

Hurwicz Score

\$1,000

10,000*0.4+(-7,000)*0.6 = - \$200

5,000*0.4+0*0.6 = \$2,000

8,000*0.4+(-2,000)*0.6 = \$2,000

14

A: Hurwicz score = 1000

B: Hurwicz score = 10000∙α + (-7000)∙(1-α) = 17000α-7000

C: Hurwicz score = 5000∙α + 0∙(1-α) = 5000α

D: Hurwicz score = 8000∙α + (-2000) ∙(1-α) = 10000α-2000

Hurwicz score = Max. payoff ∙α + Min. payoff ∙(1-α)

15

α=5/7≈0.71

α=0.2

α=0.4

When 0≤α<0.2, A is the best alternative

When 0.2≤α≤0.4, C is the best alternative

When 0.4≤α≤5/7, D is the best alternative

When α>5/7, B is the best alternative